PYSEC-2026-3530 PraisonAI: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in SearxNG / search_web tools via attacker-controlled searxng_url parameter

Summary A Server-Side Request Forgery SSRF vulnerability in the SearxNG / searchweb search tools allows an attacker to make the server perform requests to arbitrary internal endpoints and read the responses back. The searxngurl argument is passed directly to requests.get with no validation of...

PYSEC-2026-3535 praisonaiagents: SSRF guard validates literal IPs only and never resolves DNS

praisonaiagents: SSRF guard validates literal IPs only and never resolves DNS Researcher: Kai Aizen — SnailSploit @SnailSploit, Adversarial & Offensive Security Research Target: https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI Weakness: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery SSRF. --- Summary The SSRF gua...

CVE-2026-65516

Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery SSRF in PeproDev Ultimate Invoice = 2.2.6 versions...

EUVD-2026-48120

Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery SSRF in PeproDev Ultimate Invoice = 2.2.6 versions...

CVE-2026-65512

CVE-2026-65512 affects the WordPress WP Activity Log plugin (WordPress)

EUVD-2026-48107

Author Server Side Request Forgery SSRF in Complianz = 7.5.0 versions...

EUVD-2026-48099

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery CSRF in LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor = 1.6.2 versions...

CVE-2026-65488

The CVE concerns the WordPress plugin LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor, version <= 1.6.2. It describes an unauthenticated Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) that can lead to Stored XSS. The issue originates from the plugin’s handling of CSRF, enabling an attacker to trigger stored XSS withou...

CVE-2026-65466

CVE-2026-65466 concerns a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the WordPress JetBooking plugin <= 4.1.2 . The description specifies a custom role -driven SSRF vulnerability affecting JetBooking versions up to 4.1.2. The CVSSv3.1 metrics (source: Patchstack) indicate a network attack vector , ...

EUVD-2026-48182

Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery CSRF in ApusListing = 1.2.63 versions...

CVE-2026-64799

Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - SSRF via remote image downloads in Articles Anywhere and Users Anywhere extensions - Content-controlled image URLs could request private or reserved network services, follow unsafe redirects and save responses without validating that they were images. This cou...

CVE-2026-64799

Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - SSRF via remote image downloads in Articles Anywhere and Users Anywhere extensions - Content-controlled image URLs could request private or reserved network services, follow unsafe redirects and save responses without validating that they were images. This cou...

EUVD-2026-47915

Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - SSRF via remote image downloads in Articles Anywhere and Users Anywhere extensions - Content-controlled image URLs could request private or reserved network services, follow unsafe redirects and save responses without validating that they were images. This cou...

PT-2026-64185

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions 9Router versions prior to 0.4.72 Description A server-side request forgery SSRF issue exists in the '/v1/web/fetch' endpoint. The endpoint accepts a user-controlled url parameter and passes it to an external scraping provider to fetch content...

NPM: Next.js: Server-Side Request Forgery in Server Actions on custom servers

NPM: Next.js: Server-Side Request Forgery in Server Actions on custom servers vulnerability discovered by ? in WordPress Npm next versions = 14.1.1, 15.5.21...

Next.js: Server-Side Request Forgery in Server Actions on custom servers

Impact When a Server Action forwards or redirects a request, an attacker can cause the server to send that outbound request to a malicious host Server-Side Request Forgery. This requires the attacker's request to control Host-associated headers. In some configurations, it's also possible to obtai...

GHSA-2X35-3FW4-9JR4 n8n: Send Email Node Arbitrary File Read and SSRF via Nodemailer Content-Object Type Confusion

Impact The n8n Send Email node did not enforce that its message fields were strings, so a crafted untrusted non-string value from a workflow expression could be treated by the underlying mail library as a file path or URL. This could allow disclosure of local files on the n8n host. Exploitation...

GHSA-VHF8-CG2H-CG3P n8n: SSRF Protection Bypass via MCP Client Node

Impact On an n8n instance with SSRF protection enabled, the MCP Client node sent requests to a user-supplied endpoint without routing them through that protection and without pinning the resolved address. An authenticated user who could create or edit a workflow could therefore cause the server t...

n8n: Authenticated SSRF via Dynamic Node Parameters Endpoints Allows Internal Network Access

Impact Endpoints in /rest/dynamic-node-parameters/ lacked authorization scopes, making it reachable by any authenticated user with no workflow creation or execution required. By supplying an absolute URL in the routing configuration, a caller could override the node type's declared baseURL,...

GHSA-9W78-79Q7-R4FP n8n: Authenticated SSRF via Dynamic Node Parameters Endpoints Allows Internal Network Access

Impact Endpoints in /rest/dynamic-node-parameters/ lacked authorization scopes, making it reachable by any authenticated user with no workflow creation or execution required. By supplying an absolute URL in the routing configuration, a caller could override the node type's declared baseURL,...