Lucene search
+L

94 matches found

RedHat Linux
RedHat Linux
•added 2026/07/06 3:02 p.m.•15 views

RabbitMQ: RabbitMQ: Persistent foreign bindings allow unauthorized message routing

A flaw was found in RabbitMQ, a messaging and streaming broker. This vulnerability allows an attacker to establish persistent foreign bindings to reply-to destinations. This occurs because temporary queues are not properly removed, leaving behind active routing entries. This can lead to...

8.8CVSS5.8AI score0.00382EPSS
SaveExploits1References10
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/07/01 5:16 a.m.•36 views

CVE-2026-12127

The WPForms – Easy Form Builder for WordPress – Contact Forms, Payment Forms, Surveys, & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences 'CRLF Injection' in all versions up to, and including, 1.10.2 This is due to getreplytoaddress processing the Reply-To...

5.3CVSS0.00595EPSS
SaveExploits0References11
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/07/01 4:32 a.m.•67 views

CVE-2026-12127

WPForms – Easy Form Builder for WordPress (WordPress plugin WPForms Lite) versions up to 1.10.2 are vulnerable to CRLF header injection in outgoing notification emails. The root cause is improper neutralization of CRLF sequences: get_reply_to_address() expands the Reply-To display name with conte...

5.3CVSS5.9AI score0.00595EPSS
SaveExploits0References11
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/07/01 4:32 a.m.•74 views

CVE-2026-12127 WPForms <= 1.10.2 - Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences to Unauthenticated Email Header Injection via Reply-To Display Name

The WPForms – Easy Form Builder for WordPress – Contact Forms, Payment Forms, Surveys, & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences 'CRLF Injection' in all versions up to, and including, 1.10.2 This is due to getreplytoaddress processing the Reply-To...

5.3CVSS0.00595EPSS
SaveExploits0References11
attackerkb
attackerkb
•added 2026/07/01 4:32 a.m.•37 views

CVE-2026-12127

The WPForms – Easy Form Builder for WordPress – Contact Forms, Payment Forms, Surveys, & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences 'CRLF Injection' in all versions up to, and including, 1.10.2 This is due to getreplytoaddress processing the Reply-To...

5.3CVSS5.9AI score0.00595EPSS
SaveExploits0References12
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/07/01 4:32 a.m.•28 views

EUVD-2026-40907

The WPForms – Easy Form Builder for WordPress – Contact Forms, Payment Forms, Surveys, & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences 'CRLF Injection' in all versions up to, and including, 1.10.2 This is due to getreplytoaddress processing the Reply-To...

5.3CVSS5.9AI score0.00595EPSS
SaveExploits0References11
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/07/01 4:32 a.m.•31 views

CVE-2026-12127 WPForms <= 1.10.2 - Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences to Unauthenticated Email Header Injection via Reply-To Display Name

The WPForms – Easy Form Builder for WordPress – Contact Forms, Payment Forms, Surveys, & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences 'CRLF Injection' in all versions up to, and including, 1.10.2 This is due to getreplytoaddress processing the Reply-To...

5.3CVSS5.9AI score0.00595EPSS
SaveExploits0References11
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2026/07/01 12:00 a.m.•8 views

CVE-2026-12127: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences

The WPForms – Easy Form Builder for WordPress – Contact Forms, Payment Forms, Surveys, & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences 'CRLF Injection' in all versions up to, and including, 1.10.2 This is due to getreplytoaddress processing the Reply-To...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00595EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/07/01 12:00 a.m.•41 views

PT-2026-54465

The WPForms – Easy Form Builder for WordPress – Contact Forms, Payment Forms, Surveys, & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences 'CRLF Injection' in all versions up to, and including, 1.10.2 This is due to get reply to address processing the Reply-To...

5.3CVSS5.9AI score0.00595EPSS
SaveExploits0References12
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/06/16 12:37 p.m.•18 views

BIT-DISCOURSE-2026-44785 Discourse: Hidden reply-to post raw can be disclosed through AI explain prompts

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. From versions 2026.1.0 to before 2026.1.4, 2026.3.0 to before 2026.3.1, and 2026.4.0 to before 2026.4.1, the AI "explain" helper only checks cansee? on the post being explained, not its replytopost, so any authenticated user with access to the AI...

4.3CVSS5.7AI score0.00319EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/06/11 5:04 a.m.•20 views

CVE-2026-40999 Spring WS SSRF via unvalidated WS-Addressing reply destinations

When WS-Addressing is used with non-anonymous ReplyTo or FaultTo addresses, Spring WS may initiate outbound connections through configured WebServiceMessageSender instances to destinations taken directly from request headers without verifying that those destinations are safe to connect to. Affect...

8.6CVSS5.9AI score0.00428EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/06/11 5:04 a.m.•34 views

EUVD-2026-36209

When WS-Addressing is used with non-anonymous ReplyTo or FaultTo addresses, Spring WS may initiate outbound connections through configured WebServiceMessageSender instances to destinations taken directly from request headers without verifying that those destinations are safe to connect to. Affect...

8.6CVSS5.9AI score0.00428EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/06/11 5:04 a.m.•66 views

CVE-2026-40999 Spring WS SSRF via unvalidated WS-Addressing reply destinations

When WS-Addressing is used with non-anonymous ReplyTo or FaultTo addresses, Spring WS may initiate outbound connections through configured WebServiceMessageSender instances to destinations taken directly from request headers without verifying that those destinations are safe to connect to. Affect...

8.6CVSS0.00428EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2026/03/20 12:00 a.m.•3 views

CVE-2025-63260: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

SyncFusion 30.1.37 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting XSS via the Document-Editor reply to comment field and Chat-UI Chat message...

5.4CVSS5.8AI score0.00156EPSS
SaveExploits1References3
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2026/01/07 9:42 a.m.•21 views

CVE-1999-0207

Remote attacker can execute commands through Majordomo using the Reply-To field and a "lists" command...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.08717EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2025/10/07 12:30 a.m.•17 views

EUVD-1999-0207

Malware in sbrugna...

7.5CVSS6.4AI score0.08717EPSS
SaveExploits1References2
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2025/05/23 8:59 a.m.•15 views

CVE-2024-6224

The Send email only on Reply to My Comment WordPress plugin through 1.0.6 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack...

5.9CVSS5.8AI score0.00207EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
OSV
OSV
•added 2024/11/12 3:15 a.m.•28 views

CVE-2024-49394

In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed email message to impersonate the original sender...

5.3CVSS5.3AI score
SaveExploits0References2
CVE
CVE
•added 2024/11/12 2:07 a.m.•95 views

CVE-2024-49394

CVE-2024-49394 affects mutt and neomutt: the In-Reply-To header is not cryptographically signed, enabling an attacker to impersonate the sender by reusing an unencrypted but signed email. Public references in the connected documents show multiple advisories addressing this issue and releasing fix...

5.3CVSS5.1AI score0.00325EPSS
SaveExploits0References5Affected Software2
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2024/11/12 2:07 a.m.•65 views

CVE-2024-49394 Mutt: neomutt: in-reply-to email header field it not protected by cryptograpic signing

In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed email message to impersonate the original sender...

5.3CVSS0.00325EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
Rows per page
Query Builder