OperatorProposal._executeOperation() should refund excess ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There are excess ETH in OperatorProposal.executeOperation, and it should be refunded. Proof of Concept OperatorProposal.executeOperation runs data.operator.execute with data.operatorValue of ETH. data.operator.execute value: data.operatorValue...

InitialETHCrowdfund.batchContributeFor() doesn't refund for failed contributes

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact InitialETHCrowdfund.batchContributeFor doesn't refund for failed contributes when args.revertOnFailure is false. The funds will be locked in the initial crowdfund contract, so it should be refunded. Proof of Concept InitialETHCrowdfund.batchContributeFor...

InitialETHCrowdfund + ReraiseETHCrowdfund: batchContributeFor function may not refund ETH which leads to loss of funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This vulnerability exists in both the InitialETHCrowdfund and ReraiseETHCrowdfund contracts in exactly the same way. I will continue this report by explaining the issue in only one contract. The mitigation section however contains the fix for both...

OperatorProposal.sol: Leftover ETH is not refunded to the msg.sender

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The OperatorProposal contract is a type of proposal that allows to execute operations on contracts that implement the IOperator interface. Upon execution of the proposal it might be necessary that the executor provides ETH. This is true especially when...

Operator can cause funds to be stolen by manipulating gas fee refund

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An operator can manipulate the refund of gas fee mechanism to steal from the bootloader balance. Inside refundCurrentL2Transaction function in the bootloader where the refund is happening for the refund recipient at L1097, the operator provides a value f...

Transaction failure due to out of gas.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Transaction failure due to out of gas. Proof of Concept The DAO protocol allows users to deposit any tokens.If a bad actor create a fake token and deposit to the protocol,then contact the appropriate person for a refund. A malicious person adds malicious...

User might not be able to claim refund when the NFT is bought for less than the minimum reserve price

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User might not be able to claim refund when the NFT is bought for less than the minimum reserve price because the minReservePrices is rounded down, which make the contract refund sightly more eth to each user. In most case, the last user will not be able...

Loss of Long tokens when users send excess tokens to pool while minting LP tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Protocol currently uses 2 levels of callbacks for minting: Inner Level callback: timeswapV2PoolMintChoiceCallback function in Line 349 of Pool.sol that allows users to choose Long0 and Long1 amounts such that long0 + long1converted based on strike = long...

Redeemers will receive less collateral than expected if function completeRedemptions() is called with empty refundees list

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function completeRedemptions is used by admin account to distribute collateral to users and also to refund redemption requests if the redemption cannot be serviced. function completeRedemptions address calldata redeemers, address calldata refundees,...

Wrong logic totalBurned is not updated after _processRefund() results in loss of funds for redeemers

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function completeRedemptions is used by admin account to distribute collateral to users and also to refund redemption requests if the redemption cannot be serviced. function completeRedemptions address calldata redeemers, address calldata refundees,...

Not resetting totalBurned in CashManger will break user redemptions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Not resetting totalBurned in CashManger will break user redemptions The current implementation in CashManager.completeRedemptions is not updating the totalBurned amount in an epoch if there was a refund. The problem is, that if not all user redemptions can be...

_processRefund() fails to update currentRedeemAmount when epochToService == currentEpoch

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. processRefund fails to update currentRedeemAmountwhenepochToService == currentEpoch. As a result, currentRedeemAmount will contain the portion that has already been refunded, an incorrect number. Proof ...

Users have no guarantee of a minimum amount received when minting and redeeming

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It is a widely accepted practice in DeFi to offer users the ability to specify the least favorable exchange they are willing to accept. Since CASH tokens are not received in the same transaction it is not possible to create a wrapper that checks if they...

Theft of funds under relaying the transaction

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description The execTransaction function is designed to accept a relayed transaction with a transaction cost refund. At the beginning of the function, the startGas value is calculated as the amount of gas that the relayer will approximately spend on the...

Incorrect management of requested gas amount in EIP-4337 logic

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description According to the EIP-150 call can consume as most 63/64 of parent calls' gas. That means that it is possible to manipulate the gas amount to be passed into calls mentioned in the "Links to affected code" section. Specifically, if the amount of gas...

Upgraded Q -> M from #187 [1673006043496]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 187 as M risk. The relevant finding follows: L‑02 EthereumToArbitrumRelayer.processCalls does not check msg.sender is a contract The Arbitrum relay processCalls is intended to be called by EOA, as specified in the docs: Arbitrum requires an EOA to submit a brid...

CVE-2022-4047

The Return Refund and Exchange For WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 4.0.9 does not validate attachment files to be uploaded via an AJAX action available to unauthenticated users, which could allow them to upload arbitrary files such as PHP and lead to RCE...

CVE-2022-4047: Undefined Security Weakness

The Return Refund and Exchange For WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 4.0.9 does not validate attachment files to be uploaded via an AJAX action available to unauthenticated users, which could allow them to upload arbitrary files such as PHP and lead to RCE...

PT-2022-25394 · WordPress · The Return Refund/Exchange For Woocommerce

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Return Refund and Exchange For WooCommerce WordPress plugin versions prior to 4.0.9 Description: The issue concerns the lack of validation for attachment files uploaded via an AJAX action. This action is accessible to unauthenticated users,...

NOT refunding excess token while adding liquidity

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact LP providers can lose fund Proof of Concept Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps incase of ether, return excess ether - incase of erc20, transfer only required amount - --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: 😕 1 Shun...