GHSA-WWQQ-X6W4-FRM2 Gitea: Denial of Service via Unbounded io.ReadAll in NPM Package Tag Endpoint

Summary An unbounded io.ReadAllctx.Req.Body call in the NPM package tag API endpoint allows any authenticated user to crash the Gitea server by sending a single large HTTP request. The request body is read entirely into memory with no size limit, causing an Out-of-Memory OOM kill. With concurrent...

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

github.com/aquasecurity/trivy is vulnerable to Uncontrolled Resource Consumption. The vulnerability is due to the custom tar unpacker reading Helm chart archive .tgz entries using io.ReadAll without enforcing a size limit, which allows an attacker to supply a malicious compressed archive that...

Trivy: Helm chart tar bomb causes OOM via unbounded io.ReadAll in parser

Summary When Trivy scans a Helm chart archive .tgz, its custom tar unpacker reads each entry with io.ReadAlltr and no size limit. An attacker who can place a malicious .tgz file in the scanned path can craft a small compressed archive that decompresses to gigabytes, causing the Trivy process to b...

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Overview Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling via the io.ReadAll process in AI Bridge provider endpoints. An attacker can exhaust system memory and cause a crash of the control plane by sending an arbitrarily large request body...

GO-2026-4848 Vikjuna: Link Share Hash Disclosure via ReadAll Endpoint Enables Permission Escalation in code.vikunja.io/api

Vikjuna: Link Share Hash Disclosure via ReadAll Endpoint Enables Permission Escalation in code.vikunja.io/api. NOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions. If this is causing false-positive reports fr...

EUVD-2026-14925

Vikjuna: Link Share Hash Disclosure via ReadAll Endpoint Enables Permission Escalation...

CVE-2026-33680

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to version 2.2.2, the LinkSharing.ReadAll method allows link share authenticated users to list all link shares for a project, including their secret hashes. While LinkSharing.CanRead correctly blocks link share users from readi...

EUVD-2022-7121

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

BIT-ETCD-2020-15112 Improper Input Validation in etcd

In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime...

GHSA-M332-53R6-2W93 etcd's WAL `ReadAll` method vulnerable to an entry with large index causing panic

Vulnerability type Data Validation Detail In the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime...

etcd's WAL `ReadAll` method vulnerable to an entry with large index causing panic

Vulnerability type Data Validation Detail In the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime...

Denial Of Service (DoS)

etcd is vulnerable to denial of service DoS. It does not handle the case when an entry index is greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go, leading to issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant and causing a runti...

etcd: DoS in wal/wal.go

A flaw was found in etcd, where it is possible to have an entry index greater than the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This can cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus, as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant can go down from a runtime panic when...

CVE-2020-15112

In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime...

CVE-2020-15112

In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime...

DEBIAN-CVE-2020-15112

In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime...

CVE-2020-15112

In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime...

UBUNTU-CVE-2020-15112

In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime...

CVE-2020-15112

In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime...

CVE-2020-15112

In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime...