Accepted proposal may be recreated at the same address with a malicious proposal if there's a self destruct function in the accepted proposal

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A malicious proposal can take over the contract address of the accepted proposal through self-destruct Proof of Concept This issue is regarding the Tornado cash hack, whereby the attacker deploys different contracts at the same address. If the proposal...

Voter/caller's eth will be stuck in contracts if the proposal fails to pass

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Voters of AxelarServiceGovernance.sol:executeMultisigProposal or callers of Multisig.sol:execute will have their eth stuck in the contract if they can't make the proposal/call pass the vote count checks in onlySigners. Proof of Concept...

Proposal can executed even when it is in the "Queued" state.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can bypass the intended governance process and directly execute proposals that are still in the voting or canceled state. This can result in unauthorized actions being performed on the smart contract, leading to loss of funds Proof of Concept...

Ex-token holders are still able to cast votes on proposals under certain circumstances

Lines of code Vulnerability details When casting a vote, an address is limited to a certain amount of votes derived from ds.nouns.getPriorVotes. However, due to the nature of ds.nouns.getPriorVotes, the amount of votes available to an address solely depends on the amount of tokens they held when ...

Same proposer can make duplicate proposals

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A proposer can continuously create new proposals, even if they are redundant or unnecessary. This can overload the system and make it difficult for other participants to navigate through legitimate proposals. Proof of Concept In the propose function, the...

Malicious whale of forked DAO can prevent smaller token holders from creating proposals

Lines of code Vulnerability details The proposal threshold on a forked DAO can be set all the way up to 1,000 basis points. If this were the case, only whales would be able to make proposals on the forked DAO. Impact The likelihood of this is low, because in order to set the proposalThresholdBps ...

Token holders can create as many proposals as they want if they already have an active proposal by transferring their token to another wallet.

Lines of code Vulnerability details The propose function on NounsDAOV3Proposals.sol has a check called checkNoActivePropds, msg.sender, which exists to prevent token holders from spamming the propose function. Furthermore, the proposeOnTimelockV1 function calls propose directly, making it...

Vetoer can veto a non-existent proposal

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Vetoer is allowed to veto an invalid proposalId, which would prevent that proposal from getting votes, queued or executed. Proof of Concept Here is the veto function: function vetoNounsDAOStorageV3.StorageV3 storage ds, uint256 proposalId external if...

Wrong proposalThreshold amount in LybraGovernance.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The proposal can be created with only 100000 esLBR delegated instead of 10000000. Proof of Concept According to LybraV2Docs, a proposal can only be created if the sender has at least 10 million esLBR tokens delegated to his address to meet the proposal...

Voting period hardcoded to 3 blocks

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Here in the Governance contract, the voting period is locked to 3 blocks. function votingPeriod public pure override returns uint256 return 3; function votingDelay public pure override returns uint256 return 1; This is a direct bug because if we take a...

Proposal remains open to votes for only 3 blocks instead of 7 days

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact LybraGovernance contract only allows to vote during the first 3 blocks after the snapshot is taken. Assuming it takes roughly 12 seconds per 1 block on Ethereum, it is only 36 seconds to decide and vote for a proposal. This would be too fast for a regula...

OpenZeppelin Contracts's governor proposal creation may be blocked by frontrunning

Impact By frontrunning the creation of a proposal, an attacker can become the proposer and gain the ability to cancel it. The attacker can do this repeatedly to try to prevent a proposal from being proposed at all. This impacts the Governor contract in v4.9.0 only, and the...

GHSA-5H3X-9WVQ-W4M2 OpenZeppelin Contracts's governor proposal creation may be blocked by frontrunning

Impact By frontrunning the creation of a proposal, an attacker can become the proposer and gain the ability to cancel it. The attacker can do this repeatedly to try to prevent a proposal from being proposed at all. This impacts the Governor contract in v4.9.0 only, and the...

Design/Logic Flaw

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. By frontrunning the creation of a proposal, an attacker can become the proposer and gain the ability to cancel it. The attacker can do this repeatedly to try to prevent a proposal from being proposed at all. This impacts the...

CVE-2023-34234 Governor proposal creation may be blocked by frontrunning in OpenZeppelin

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. By frontrunning the creation of a proposal, an attacker can become the proposer and gain the ability to cancel it. The attacker can do this repeatedly to try to prevent a proposal from being proposed at all. This impacts the...

CVE-2023-34234 Governor proposal creation may be blocked by frontrunning in OpenZeppelin

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. By frontrunning the creation of a proposal, an attacker can become the proposer and gain the ability to cancel it. The attacker can do this repeatedly to try to prevent a proposal from being proposed at all. This impacts the...

OpenZeppelin 安全漏洞

OpenZeppelin is a software application. A standard for secure blockchain applications. A security vulnerability exists in OpenZeppelin Contracts versions prior to 4.3.0 through 4.9.1 that stems from allowing an attacker to gain the ability to cancel a proposal by creating it in advance...

Possible overflow in PartyGovernance._isUnanimousVotes()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Proposals can't be executed if totalVotes = 8e24. Furthermore, if emergencyExecuteDisabled == true and rageQuitTimestamp == DISABLERAGEQUITPERMANENTLY, users can't take out the funds from the party forever. Proof of Concept In isUnanimousVotes, it...

accept() can be delayed or gas-griefed by burning a governance NFT

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Rage quitting or burning a token will set the lastBurnTimestamp to the current block's timestamp. This disables accept for the rest of the transactions in the block. This bug can be abused to either gas-grief or delay acceptance of proposals long enough...

It is possible to steal the unallocated part of every delegation period budget

Lines of code Vulnerability details Attacker can monitor the standard proposals distribution and routinely steal each low activity period remainder by submitting a transfer to self proposal and voting a dust amount for it. Since the criteria for the final slate update is that any increase in tota...