CVE-2026-28116

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation 'Cross-site Scripting' vulnerability in Emilia Projects Progress Planner allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Progress Planner: from n/a through 1.9.0...

CVE-2026-28116

CVE-2026-28116 affects the WordPress Progress Planner plugin up to version 1.9.0. The issue is a Stored XSS due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. Under CVSS 3.1, the impact is Low for confidentiality, integrity, and availability, with a Network attack vector, Low att...

EUVD-2026-33929

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation 'Cross-site Scripting' vulnerability in Emilia Projects Progress Planner allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Progress Planner: from n/a through 1.9.0...

CVE-2026-28116 WordPress Progress Planner plugin <= 1.9.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation 'Cross-site Scripting' vulnerability in Emilia Projects Progress Planner allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Progress Planner: from n/a through 1.9.0...

WordPress Progress Planner plugin <= 1.9.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Cross Site Scripting XSS vulnerability discovered by hongdo in WordPress Plugin Progress Planner versions = 1.9.0...

CVE-2026-7313

CVE-2026-7313 affects Progress Sitefinity Web Services (versions 8.0.5700–13.3.7652). It describes CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials in web services, allowing a remote authenticated attacker to obtain plaintext credentials used to connect to the Sitefinity Insight service. Exploitatio...

CVE-2026-7201

Progress Sitefinity (Progress) is affected by CVE-2026-7201: CWE-639, an authorization bypass through a user-controlled key in web services. A remote authenticated attacker can modify account properties of other users, potentially leading to account compromise, requiring access to values not norm...

CVE-2026-7201 CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in web services in Progress Sitefinity

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in web services in Progress Sitefinity 15.2.x before 15.2.8441, 15.3.x before 15.3.8531, and 15.4.x before 15.4.8630 allows a remote authenticated attacker to modify account properties of other users, potentially leading to account...

CVE-2026-7201 CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in web services in Progress Sitefinity

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in web services in Progress Sitefinity 15.2.x before 15.2.8441, 15.3.x before 15.3.8531, and 15.4.x before 15.4.8630 allows a remote authenticated attacker to modify account properties of other users, potentially leading to account...

EUVD-2026-33920

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in web services in Progress Sitefinity 15.2.x before 15.2.8441, 15.3.x before 15.3.8531, and 15.4.x before 15.4.8630 allows a remote authenticated attacker to modify account properties of other users, potentially leading to account...

CVE-2026-7201

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in web services in Progress Sitefinity 15.2.x before 15.2.8441, 15.3.x before 15.3.8531, and 15.4.x before 15.4.8630 allows a remote authenticated attacker to modify account properties of other users, potentially leading to account...

EUVD-2026-33919

CWE-284: Improper Access Control in web services in Progress Sitefinity 15.4.8623 before 15.4.8630 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to access content that should be restricted, resulting in full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected installations...

CVE-2026-7198 CWE-284: Improper Access Control in web services in Progress Sitefinity

CWE-284: Improper Access Control in web services in Progress Sitefinity 15.4.8623 before 15.4.8630 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to access content that should be restricted, resulting in full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected installations...

CVE-2026-7198 CWE-284: Improper Access Control in web services in Progress Sitefinity

CWE-284: Improper Access Control in web services in Progress Sitefinity 15.4.8623 before 15.4.8630 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to access content that should be restricted, resulting in full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected installations...

PT-2026-45748

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation 'Cross-site Scripting' vulnerability in Emilia Projects Progress Planner allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Progress Planner: from n/a through 1.9.0...

GHSA-HPV4-5H6F-WQR3 russh server userauth state is not reset when authentication principal changes

Summary The russh server authentication path keeps internal userauth state across SSHMSGUSERAUTHREQUEST messages without separating that state when the request principal changes. RFC 4252 allows the user name and service name fields to change between authentication requests. The issue is not that...

russh server userauth state is not reset when authentication principal changes

Summary The russh server authentication path keeps internal userauth state across SSHMSGUSERAUTHREQUEST messages without separating that state when the request principal changes. RFC 4252 allows the user name and service name fields to change between authentication requests. The issue is not that...

PT-2026-45018

Summary The russh server authentication path keeps internal userauth state across SSH MSG USERAUTH REQUEST messages without separating that state when the request principal changes. RFC 4252 allows the user name and service name fields to change between authentication requests. The issue is not...

SUSE CVE-2026-45855

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ata: libata-scsi: avoid Non-NCQ command starvation When a non-NCQ command is issued while NCQ commands are being executed, atascsiqcissue indicates to the SCSI layer that the command issuing should be deferred by returning...

CVE-2026-45855

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ata: libata-scsi: avoid Non-NCQ command starvation When a non-NCQ command is issued while NCQ commands are being executed, atascsiqcissue indicates to the SCSI layer that the command issuing should be deferred by returning...