2208 matches found
CVE-2024-3596 RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature...
CVE-2024-3596 RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature...
CVE-2024-3596
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature...
CVE-2024-3596
Summary: CVE-2024-3596 is a forgery vulnerability in RADIUS (RFC 2865) where a local attacker can modify a valid RADIUS response to another response using a chosen-prefix collision against MD5. The vulnerability is associated with FreeRADIUS and is covered in multiple advisories (ALAS/ALSA) confi...
CVE-2024-3596 RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature...
CVE-2024-3596
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature...
UBUNTU-CVE-2024-3596
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature...
RADIUS protocol susceptible to forgery attacks.
Overview A vulnerability in the RADIUS protocol allows an attacker allows an attacker to forge an authentication response in cases where a Message-Authenticator attribute is not required or enforced. This vulnerability results from a cryptographically insecure integrity check when validating...
KB5040430: Windows 10 version 1809 / Windows Server 2019 Security Update (July 2024)
The remote Windows host is missing security update 5040430. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities - RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge to any othe...
KB5040437: Windows Server 2022 / Azure Stack HCI 22H2 Security Update (July 2024)
The remote Windows host is missing security update 5040437. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities - RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge to any othe...
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 安全漏洞
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is an RFC open source networking protocol. A security vulnerability exists in RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865, which can be exploited by an attacker to modify any valid response Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge to any other response using a Choice...
KB5040438: Windows 11 version 22H2 / Windows Server version 23H2 Security Update (July 2024)
The remote Windows host is missing security update 5040438. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities - RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge to any othe...
CVE-2023-47856
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the boa setRadvdPrefixParam functionality of Realtek rtl819x Jungle SDK v3.4.11. A specially crafted series of network requests can lead to remote code execution. An attacker can send a sequence of requests to trigger this vulnerability...
CVE-2024-38475
Improper escaping of output in modrewrite in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.59 and earlier allows an attacker to map URLs to filesystem locations that are permitted to be served by the server but are not intentionally/directly reachable by any URL, resulting in code execution or source code disclosure...
UBUNTU-CVE-2024-38475
Improper escaping of output in modrewrite in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.59 and earlier allows an attacker to map URLs to filesystem locations that are permitted to be served by the server but are not intentionally/directly reachable by any URL, resulting in code execution or source code disclosure...
SUSE CVE-2024-39291
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: Fix buffer size in gfxv943init cpcomputemicrocode and rlcmicrocode The function gfxv943initmicrocode in gfxv943.c was generating about potential truncation of output when using the snprintf function. The issue was due...
AZL-42907 CVE-2024-39291 affecting package kernel for versions less than 6.6.35.1-4
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: Fix buffer size in gfxv943init cpcomputemicrocode and rlcmicrocode The function gfxv943initmicrocode in gfxv943.c was generating about potential truncation of output when using the snprintf function. The issue was due...
RHEL 8 / 9 : OpenShift Container Platform 4.14.30 (RHSA-2024:3918)
The remote Redhat Enterprise Linux 8 / 9 host has packages installed that are affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the RHSA-2024:3918 advisory. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is Red Hat's cloud computing Kubernetes application platform solution designed for on-premise or private clo...
CVE-2024-5699
In violation of spec, cookie prefixes such as Secure were being ignored if they were not correctly capitalized - by spec they should be checked with a case-insensitive comparison. This could have resulted in the browser not correctly honoring the behaviors specified by the prefix. This...
CVE-2024-5699
In violation of spec, cookie prefixes such as Secure were being ignored if they were not correctly capitalized - by spec they should be checked with a case-insensitive comparison. This could have resulted in the browser not correctly honoring the behaviors specified by the prefix. This...