Lack checks if Pool deployed by the canonical UniswapV3Factory in uniswapV3SwapCallback

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Loss of deserved tokens or DoS when users use this contract. Proof of Concept According to the uniswap docs: The caller of this method must be checked to be a UniswapV3Pool deployed by the canonical UniswapV3Factory. However, there is no check in this...

Borrowers can be liquidated before default by being based on the borrowBalance from other pools

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Borrower can be liquidated before default based on the borrowBalance from other pools. In the liquidity snapshot, borrows from other pools are added as total borrow but the collateral that is used which might not be used as collateral for the poolfor the...

Borrower can redeem there collateral without repaying debt completely

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A borrower can redeem token in a pool though it has been used as a collateral in another pool without repaying the debt. Borrower can redeem the token as underlying asset even if his/her loan position is in the situation of liquidation. Proof of Concept...

Wrong WhitePaperInterestRateModel block per year calculations incur losses for users and the protocol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details Blocks per year calculations in WhitePaperInterestRateModel improperly assume 15 seconds block time, while on Binance Smart Chain it’s 3 seconds. This has grave consequences, because it is used in calculating borrower’s interest rate and...

mint() function: an attacker can mint multiple position NFTs for one or more legit Ajna users who have LP in Ajna pools. This should not be possible.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The current implementation of the mint function does not ensure that only the owner of a liquidity pool LP deposit can mint position NFTs. As a result, an attacker can mint multiple position NFTs on behalf of legitimate Ajna users who have LP in Ajna...

pacificpools.cz Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3259444

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

CVE-2022-46773

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 - 21.0.7 and 23.0.0 is vulnerable to client-side validation bypass for credential pools. Invalid credential pools may be created as a result. IBM X-Force ID: 242951...

CVE-2022-46773

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 - 21.0.7 and 23.0.0 is vulnerable to client-side validation bypass for credential pools. Invalid credential pools may be created as a result. IBM X-Force ID: 242951...

Input validation

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 - 21.0.7 and 23.0.0 is vulnerable to client-side validation bypass for credential pools. Invalid credential pools may be created as a result. IBM X-Force ID: 242951...

CVE-2022-46773 IBM Robotic Process Automation security bypass

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 - 21.0.7 and 23.0.0 is vulnerable to client-side validation bypass for credential pools. Invalid credential pools may be created as a result. IBM X-Force ID: 242951...

CVE-2022-46773

IBM Robotic Process Automation (IBM RPA) versions 21.0.0–21.0.7 and 23.0.0 are affected by a client-side validation bypass in credential pools, which may allow creation of invalid credential pools. The issue’s root cause is client-side validation bypass for credential pools; impact is potential m...

Wrong accounting of share leading to incorrect amount of BYTES be minted per second

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In NeoTokyoStaker, staker is a competitive system where stakers compete for a fixed emission rate in each of the S1 Citizen, S2 Citizen, and LP token staking pools. For each staking pool, there are some reward windows. Each reward window has different...

CVE-2022-46773: Improper Authentication

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 - 21.0.7 and 23.0.0 is vulnerable to client-side validation bypass for credential pools. Invalid credential pools may be created as a result. IBM X-Force ID: 242951...

CVE-2022-2259

In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to view Workerpools without being explicitly assigned permissions to view these items...

Security Bulletin: A vulnerability in IBM Robotic Process Automation may allow a user to create invalid credential pools (CVE-2022-46773)

Summary There is a vulnerability in IBM Robotic Process Automation which may allow an authenticated user to create invalid credential pools. CVE-2022-46773. This bulletin identifies the security fixes to apply to address this vulnerability. Vulnerability Details CVEID:CVE-2022-46773 DESCRIPTION:...

K67175700: Apache vulnerabilities CVE-2020-9490, CVE-2020-11984, CVE-2020-11993

Security Advisory Description CVE-2020-9490 Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.20 to 2.4.43. A specially crafted value for the 'Cache-Digest' header in a HTTP/2 request would result in a crash when the server actually tries to HTTP/2 PUSH a resource afterwards. Configuring the HTTP/2 feature via...

SUSE CVE-2010-2068

modproxyhttp.c in modproxyhttp in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.9 through 2.2.15, 2.3.4-alpha, and 2.3.5-alpha on Windows, NetWare, and OS/2, in certain configurations involving proxy worker pools, does not properly detect timeouts, which allows remote attackers to obtain a potentially sensitive...

SUSE CVE-2018-10861

A flaw was found in the way ceph mon handles user requests. Any authenticated ceph user having read access to ceph can delete, create ceph storage pools and corrupt snapshot images. Ceph branches master, mimic, luminous and jewel are believed to be affected...

SUSE CVE-2020-10703

A NULL pointer dereference was found in the libvirt API responsible introduced in upstream version 3.10.0, and fixed in libvirt 6.0.0, for fetching a storage pool based on its target path. In more detail, this flaw affects storage pools created without a target path such as network-based pools li...

TokenggAVAX.sol : First depositor can break minting of shares

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A well known attack vector for almost all shares based liquidity pool contracts, where an early user can manipulate the price per share and profit from late users' deposits because of the precision loss caused by the rather large value of price per share...