6531 matches found
CVE-2020-12958
CVE-2020-12958 is rejected/not used per the initial description.
CVE-2020-12945
CVE-2020-12945 entry is rejected/not used per description.
CVE-2020-12943
CVE-2020-12943 is rejected/not used; this CVE ID does not represent an active vulnerability entry.
CVE-2020-12907
CVE-2020-12907 is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability entry.
applyCover() Does Not Enforce Index Market Lock
Handle leastwood Vulnerability details Impact The applyCover function is called by the insurance pool owner and intends to store data related to an insurance incident. Upon function execution, applyCover iterates over all available index markets and calls lock, denying all deposits and withdrawal...
[WP-H27] IndexTemplate.sol#compensate() will most certainly fail
Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details Root Cause Precision loss while converting between the amount of shares and the amount of underlying tokens back and forth is not handled properly. uint256 shortage; if totalLiquidity amount //Insolvency case shortage = amount - value; uint256 cds =...
the first depositor to a pool can drain all users
Handle danb Vulnerability details if there is no liquidity in the pool, the first deposit determines the total liquidity, if the amount is too small the minted liquidity for the next liquidity providers will round down to zero. Impact An attacker can steal all money from liquidity providers. Proo...
System Debt Is Not Handled When Insurance Pools Become Insolvent
Handle leastwood Vulnerability details Impact If an incident has occurred where an insurance policy is to be redeemed. The market is put into the MarketStatus.Payingout mode where the insurance.insured account is allowed to redeem their cover and receive a payout amount. Upon paying out the...
Unbounded iteration over all pools
Handle Dravee Vulnerability details Impact The transactions could fail if the array get too big and the transaction would consume more gas than the block limit. This will then result in a denial of service for the desired functionality and break core functionality. Proof of Concept Tools Used VS...
[WP-H36] Admin of the index pool can withdrawCredit() after applyCover() to avoid taking loss for the compensation paid for a certain pool
Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details In the current implementation, when an incident is reported for a certain pool, the index pool can still withdrawCredit from the pool, which in the best interest of an index pool, the admin of the index pool is preferred to do so. This allows the index pool t...
[WP-H2] NonUSTStrategy.sol Improper handling of swap fees allows attacker to steal funds from other users
Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details NonUSTStrategy will swap the deposited non-UST assets into UST before depositing to EthAnchor. However, the swap fee is not attributed to the depositor correctly like many other yield farming vaults involving swaps ZapIn. An attacker can exploit it for the sw...
Lack of slippage checks during swap
Handle ye0lde Vulnerability details Impact Since the code does not use a minimum return value for swaps it is susceptible to sandwich attacks. More information here: Proof of Concept Here the code Calls Curve to convert the existing underlying balance into UST: / Calls Curve to convert the existi...
TimeswapPair.sol#mint() Lack of input validation allows attacker to set pool.state.y to an arbitrary target value
Handle WatchPug Vulnerability details pool.state.y += yIncrease; TimeswapPair.solmint takes a user input value of yIncrease without proper validation, which means that it allows the state of pool.state.y to increase by the arbitrary value set by the caller. Impact When pool.state.y is extremely...
Griefing attack can prevent almost all activity in a pool
Handle harleythedog Vulnerability details Impact Consider the mint function in TimeswapPair.sol. The caller of this function is able to freely specify xIncrease, yIncrease and zIncrease. In particular, it is possible to specify xIncrease and zIncrease to be extremely small values e.g. 1 wei, whil...
Exploit for Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer in Sophos Hitmanpro
引用 这篇文章的目的是介绍一种基于内核态内存的越界写入通用利用技术和相关工具复现. toc 简介 笔者的在原作者池风水利用工具以下简称工具基础上进行二次开发,新增了全自动获取内核调试模块符号的偏移量及配置参数和不同漏洞利用方式优化等功能, 解决了不同Windows版本适配问题,工具包括适配驱动和利用程序两部分组成,实现了在Windows 10 19H1之后任意版本包括满补丁系统上的稳定利用. 自Windows 10 19H1开始，用户层段堆（Segment Heap）结构后端逻辑被用于内核层，主要分为低碎片化堆Low-fragmentation Heap与VS堆Variable Size...
VaderPoolV2 minting synths & fungibles can be frontrun
Handle cmichel Vulnerability details The VaderPoolV2 mintFungible and mintSynth functions perform an unsafe nativeAsset.safeTransferFromfrom, addressthis, nativeDeposit with a parameter-specified from address. Note that these functions are not called by the Router, they are directly called on the...
[SECURITY] Fedora 34 Update: keepalived-2.2.4-2.fc34
Keepalived provides simple and robust facilities for load balancing and high availability to Linux system and Linux based infrastructures. The load balancing framework relies on well-known and widely used Linux Virtual Server IPVS kernel module providing Layer4 load balancing. Keepalived implemen...
mintSynth is vulnerable to price manipulation.
Handle certora Vulnerability details mintSynth is vulnerable to price manipulation. amountSynth is calculated based on the current price, which can be manipulated. Impact Pool funds can be stolen. Proof of Concept pool funds can be stolen in the following steps: take a flashloan of foreignAsset...
Pool Manager can frontrun fees to 100% and use it to steal the value from users
Handle pedroais Vulnerability details Impact Pool Manager can front-run entry fee to 100% and users could lose all their deposits Proof of Concept Considering : The pool manager is the creator of the pool Anyone can create a pool Manager is not a trusted actor Anyone can create a pool and get...
