6601 matches found
CVE-2022-39924
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none...
CVE-2022-39922
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none...
CVE-2022-39923
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none...
CVE-2022-39927
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none...
CVE-2022-39930
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none...
CVE-2022-39932
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none...
CVE-2022-39920
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none...
CVE-2022-39918
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none...
CVE-2022-39918
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none...
CVE-2022-39919
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none...
HCL BigFix Multiple Vulnerabilities (KB0098998)
The version of HCL BigFix Client installed on the remote host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities, including the following: - An improper authentication vulnerability exists in the curl subcomponent which might allow reuse OAUTH2-authenticated connections without properly making sure that the...
exactInput allows stealing of funds via a malicious pool contract
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Users can lose funds during swapping. Proof of Concept The Router contract is a higher level contract that will be used by the majority of the users. The contract implements the exactInput functions that users call to perform multiple swaps in a single...
There is no option to cancel an EMERGENCY mode.
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is no option to cancel an EMERGENCY mode in the pool. Once the pool is in an EMERGENCY mode, the pool can't work as normal forever. Proof of Concept The pool can be changed to an EMERGENCY mode by adminAction. function adminActionuint256 action,...
Pool with any fee tier can be created
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Pool with any fee tier can be created Proof of Concept There is a section in this medium: In Fee Structure: Maverick AMM supports initializing pools with arbitrary fee rates, but it is expected that LPs will choose from one of the following “standard” fe...
Overflow in BinMap can break pool
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The BinMap library performs multiplication on int32 values that can potentially overflow and cause the corresponding function calls to revert. The functions in question are used by essential Pool methods such as Pool.addLiquidity or Pool.swap and an...
Pool: The EMERGENCY state cannot be recovered
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The owner can call Pool.adminAction to set the Pool contract state to EMERGENCY, and in the EMERGENCY state, no liquidity can be added or transferred, and no swaps can be made. However, the Pool contract does not have a function to recover the EMERGENCY...
Router.exactInputInternal doesn't check that swapped amount is same as amountIn provided by user
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Router.exactInputInternal doesn't check that swapped amount is same as amountIn provided by user. In case if it's not, then exact function doesn't do what it should. It doesn't trade exact amount of tokens. Proof of Concept If user calls...
Anyone can call addLiquidity function and be the router
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Anyone can call addLiquidity, meaning that when IAddLiquidityCallbackmsg.sender.addLiquidityCallbacktokenAAmount, tokenBAmount, data; is called, the msg.sender can be a contract that a malicious user has deployed and has a addLiquidityCallbacktokenAAmoun...
PT-2022-36226 · Linux · Linux Kernel
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Linux Kernel versions prior to v5.15.78 Description: The issue is related to an integer overflow in the ghes estatus pool init function. The actual impact and attack plausibility have not yet been proven. Recommendations: For Linux Kernel...
Actor can send an arbitrary token when adding liquidity
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Anyone can call addLiquidity directly and can input tokenId, params and data. The data inputs are never checked, so the user can send anything in there. Since the erc20 tokens routed are defined in the data parameter, user could send any token. Since the...