183 matches found
HTTP Request Smuggling in netius
netius prior to 1.17.58 is vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Transfer encoding header parsing which could allow for CL:TE or TE:TE attacks...
OESA-2021-1169 rubygem-puma security update
Security Fixes: In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4.CVE-2020-11076 In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request...
NewStart CGSL CORE 5.05 / MAIN 5.05 : bind Multiple Vulnerabilities (NS-SA-2020-0095)
The remote NewStart CGSL host, running version CORE 5.05 / MAIN 5.05, has bind packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities: - managed-keys is a feature which allows a BIND resolver to automatically maintain the keys used by trust anchors which operators configure for use in...
EulerOS Virtualization for ARM 64 3.0.6.0 : python-waitress (EulerOS-SA-2020-2049)
According to the versions of the python-waitress package installed, the EulerOS Virtualization for ARM 64 installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities : - Waitress through version 1.3.1 would parse the Transfer-Encoding header and only look for a single string valu...
Medium: bind
Issue Overview: "managed-keys" is a feature which allows a BIND resolver to automatically maintain the keys used by trust anchors which operators configure for use in DNSSEC validation. Due to an error in the managed-keys feature it is possible for a BIND server which uses managed-keys to exit du...
RUSTSEC-2020-0031 HTTP Request smuggling through malformed Transfer Encoding headers
HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks are possible due to incorrect Transfer encoding header parsing. It is possible conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks CL:TE/TE:TE by sending invalid Transfer Encoding headers. By manipulating the HTTP response the attacker could poison a...
HTTP Request smuggling through malformed Transfer Encoding headers
HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks are possible due to incorrect Transfer encoding header parsing. It is possible conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks CL:TE/TE:TE by sending invalid Transfer Encoding headers. By manipulating the HTTP response the attacker could poison a...
CVE-2020-7670
agoo prior to 2.14.0 allows request smuggling attacks where agoo is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Content-Length and Transfer encoding header parsing. It is possible to conduct...
Design/Logic Flaw
agoo prior to 2.14.0 allows request smuggling attacks where agoo is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Content-Length and Transfer encoding header parsing. It is possible to conduct...
CVE-2020-7670
Agoo prior to 2.14.0 is affected. The issue arises from incorrect parsing of Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers, enabling HTTP request smuggling when Agoo is used as a backend and a frontend proxy in a chain of backends. Impact is described as possible request smuggling due to TE/CL han...
CVE-2020-7658
meinheld prior to 1.0.2 is vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Content-Length and Transfer encoding header parsing...
CVE-2020-7658
meinheld prior to 1.0.2 is vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Content-Length and Transfer encoding header parsing...
CVE-2020-11077
In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...
DEBIAN-CVE-2020-11077
In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...
CVE-2020-11077
CVE-2020-11077 affects the Puma RubyGem HTTP server. It describes an HTTP request/response smuggling scenario where a proxy with persistent connections and HTTP pipelining can cause the proxy to deliver a second response to the wrong client, due to how Puma parses the first request and its body. ...
CVE-2020-11077
In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...
GHSA-W64W-QQPH-5GXM HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma
Impact This is a similar but different vulnerability to the one patched in 3.12.5 and 4.3.4. A client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via...
PT-2020-12536 · Puma +4 · Puma +4
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Puma versions prior to 3.12.6 Puma versions prior to 4.3.5 Description: A client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the...
CVE-2020-7655
netius prior to 1.17.58 is vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Transfer encoding header parsing which could allow for CL:TE or TE:TE attacks...
PYSEC-2020-242
netius prior to 1.17.58 is vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Transfer encoding header parsing which could allow for CL:TE or TE:TE attacks...