Lucene search
K

9 matches found

SUSE CVE
SUSE CVE
added 2023/02/15 4:57 a.m.2 views

SUSE CVE-2016-8602

The .sethalftone5 function in psi/zht2.c in Ghostscript before 9.21 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service application crash or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted Postscript document that calls .sethalftone5 with an empty operand stack...

7.8CVSS9.6AI score0.01235EPSS
Exploits0References8
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus
added 2019/08/12 12:0 a.m.28 views

NewStart CGSL CORE 5.04 / MAIN 5.04 : ghostscript Multiple Vulnerabilities (NS-SA-2019-0054)

The remote NewStart CGSL host, running version CORE 5.04 / MAIN 5.04, has ghostscript packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities: - It was discovered that the ghostscript PDF14 compositor did not properly handle the copying of a device. An attacker could possibly exploit thi...

7.8CVSS7.9AI score0.65283EPSS
Exploits5References6
RedHat Linux
RedHat Linux
added 2019/01/31 6:37 p.m.1 views

ghostscript: subroutines within pseudo-operators must themselves be pseudo-operators (700317)

It was found that ghostscript could leak sensitive operators on the operand stack when a pseudo-operator pushes a subroutine. A specially crafted PostScript file could use this flaw to escape the -dSAFER protection in order to, for example, have access to the file system outside of the SAFER...

7.8CVSS5.8AI score0.60542EPSS
Exploits2References5
0day.today
0day.today
added 2019/01/24 12:0 a.m.94 views

Ghostscript 9.26 - Pseudo-Operator Remote Code Execution Exploit

Ghostscript 9.26 - Pseudo-Operator Remote Code Execution Exploit I noticed ghostscript 9.26 was released, so had a quick look and spotted some errors. For background, this is how you define a subroutine in postscript: /hello hello\n print def That's simple enough, but because a subroutine is just...

7.8CVSS0.2AI score0.60542EPSS
Exploits2
Exploit DB
Exploit DB
added 2019/01/24 12:0 a.m.128 views

Ghostscript 9.26 - Pseudo-Operator Remote Code Execution

I noticed ghostscript 9.26 was released, so had a quick look and spotted some errors. For background, this is how you define a subroutine in postscript: /hello hello\n print def That's simple enough, but because a subroutine is just an executable array of commands, you need to mark it as...

7.4AI score
Exploits0
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
added 2019/01/23 8:20 p.m.26 views

CVE-2019-6116

It was found that ghostscript could leak sensitive operators on the operand stack when a pseudo-operator pushes a subroutine. A specially crafted PostScript file could use this flaw to escape the -dSAFER protection in order to, for example, have access to the file system outside of the SAFER...

9.3CVSS1.3AI score0.9181EPSS
Exploits6References3
RedHat Linux
RedHat Linux
added 2017/05/12 10:19 a.m.2 views

ghostscript: corruption of operand stack

It was found that ghostscript did not properly validate the parameters passed to the .rsdparams and .eqproc functions. During its execution, a specially crafted PostScript document could execute code in the context of the ghostscript process, bypassing the -dSAFER protection...

7.8CVSS5.9AI score0.92931EPSS
Exploits7References5
OSV
OSV
added 2017/04/14 6:59 p.m.1 views

DEBIAN-CVE-2016-8602

The .sethalftone5 function in psi/zht2.c in Ghostscript before 9.21 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service application crash or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted Postscript document that calls .sethalftone5 with an empty operand stack...

7.8CVSS8AI score0.01235EPSS
Exploits0References1
Debian CVE
Debian CVE
added 2017/04/14 6:0 p.m.27 views

CVE-2016-8602

The .sethalftone5 function in psi/zht2.c in Ghostscript before 9.21 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service application crash or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted Postscript document that calls .sethalftone5 with an empty operand stack...

7.8CVSS9.2AI score0.01235EPSS
Exploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder