_safeMint() should be used rather than _mint() wherever possible

Lines of code 139, 178, 204 Vulnerability details mint is discouraged in favor of safeMint which ensures that the recipient is either an EOA or implements IERC721Receiver. Both OpenZeppelin and solmate have versions of this function. In the cases below, mint does not call...

_safeMint() should be used rather than _mint() wherever possible

Lines of code 139, 178, 204 Vulnerability details mint is discouraged in favor of safeMint which ensures that the recipient is either an EOA or implements IERC721Receiver. Both OpenZeppelin and solmate have versions of this function. In the cases below, mint does not call...

GHSA-699G-Q6QH-Q4V8 OpenZeppelin Contracts and Contracts Upgradeable duplicated execution of subcalls in v4.9.4

Context Merge conflict resolution issue when porting the v5.0.1 Multicall update to the v4.9 branch caused a duplicated line. Impact Versions using Multicall from @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected] will execute each subcall twice. Concretely, this exposes ...

@offchainlabs/l1-l3-teleport-contracts (>=0.1.0-alpha.1, <=1.0.1) potentially affected by CVE-2023-49798 via @openzeppelin/contracts (4.9.4)

@openzeppelin/contracts NPM version 4.9.4 is affected by a known vulnerability. The following packages have a transitive dependency on @openzeppelin/contracts and may be impacted: - @offchainlabs/l1-l3-teleport-contracts =0.1.0-alpha.1, =1.0.1 Source cves: CVE-2023-49798 Source advisory:...

OpenZeppelin Contracts and Contracts Upgradeable duplicated execution of subcalls in v4.9.4

Context Merge conflict resolution issue when porting the v5.0.1 Multicall update to the v4.9 branch caused a duplicated line. Impact Versions using Multicall from @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected] will execute each subcall twice. Concretely, this exposes ...

Unsafe use of transfer()/transferFrom() with IERC20

Lines of code 377, 509, 491, 530, 42, 50 Vulnerability details Some tokens do not implement the ERC20 standard properly but are still accepted by most code that accepts ERC20 tokens. For example Tether USDT's transfer and transferFrom functions on L1 do not return booleans as the specification...

Unsafe use of transfer()/transferFrom() with IERC20

Lines of code 377, 509, 491, 530, 42, 50 Vulnerability details Some tokens do not implement the ERC20 standard properly but are still accepted by most code that accepts ERC20 tokens. For example Tether USDT's transfer and transferFrom functions on L1 do not return booleans as the specification...

Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation

OpenZeppelin is vulnerable to Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation. The vulnerability is due to the duplication of functionDelegateCall in the Multicall.sol file. This could lead to Unintended Duplicate Operations...

CVE-2023-49798

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of Multicall.sol released in @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected], all subcalls are...

Design/Logic Flaw

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of Multicall.sol released in @openzeppelin/email protected and @openzeppelin/email protected, all subcalls are executed twice...

OpenZeppelin Security Vulnerability

OpenZeppelin is a software application. A standard for secure blockchain applications. OpenZeppelin Contracts suffers from a security vulnerability that stems from subjecting users to unintentional duplicate operations, such as asset transfers...

CVE-2023-49798

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of Multicall.sol released in @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected], all subcalls are...

CVE-2023-49798 Duplicated execution of subcalls in OpenZeppelin Contracts

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of Multicall.sol released in @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected], all subcalls are...

CVE-2023-49798

OpenZeppelin Contracts’ CVE-2023-49798 relates to a merge-conflict error in the Multicall.sol implementation that caused all subcalls to be executed twice in versions @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected]. This duplication could lead to unintended duplicate o...

CVE-2023-49798 Duplicated execution of subcalls in OpenZeppelin Contracts

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of Multicall.sol released in @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected], all subcalls are...

PT-2023-31356

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions @openzeppelin/contracts versions 4.9.4 @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable versions 4.9.4 Description A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication in the Multicall.sol file. This results in all subcall...

CVE-2023-49798: Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of Multicall.sol released in @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected], all subcalls are...

_safeMint() should be used rather than _mint() wherever possible

Lines of code 139, 178, 204 Vulnerability details Impact mint is discouraged in favor of safeMint which ensures that the recipient is either an EOA or implements IERC721Receiver. Both OpenZeppelin and solmate have versions of this function. In the cases below, mint does not call...

Unsafe use of transfer()/transferFrom() with IERC20

Lines of code 377, 509, 491, 530, 42, 50 Vulnerability details Impact Some tokens do not implement the ERC20 standard properly but are still accepted by most code that accepts ERC20 tokens. For example Tether USDT's transfer and transferFrom functions on L1 do not return booleans as the...

Unhandled contract ownership states can lead to unexpected behaviour

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact OpenZeppelin's Ownable2step library's ownership states can lead unexpected behavior in certain functions Proof of Concept The ownable2step contract includes a pendingOwner entity which defines an address ownership has been transferred to but has not...