SUSE CVE-2025-40169

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject negative offsets for ALU ops When verifying BPF programs, the checkaluop function validates instructions with ALU operations. The 'offset' field in these instructions is a signed 16-bit integer. The existing check...

CVE-2025-40169

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject negative offsets for ALU ops When verifying BPF programs, the checkaluop function validates instructions with ALU operations. The 'offset' field in these instructions is a signed 16-bit integer. The existing check...

EUVD-2025-124914

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject negative offsets for ALU ops When verifying BPF programs, the checkaluop function validates instructions with ALU operations. The 'offset' field in these instructions is a signed 16-bit integer. The existing check...

CVE-2025-40169

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject negative offsets for ALU ops When verifying BPF programs, the checkaluop function validates instructions with ALU operations. The 'offset' field in these instructions is a signed 16-bit integer. The existing check...

UBUNTU-CVE-2025-40169

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject negative offsets for ALU ops When verifying BPF programs, the checkaluop function validates instructions with ALU operations. The 'offset' field in these instructions is a signed 16-bit integer. The existing check...

CVE-2025-40169

CVE-2025-40169 : In the Linux kernel BPF verifier, check_alu_op() previously allowed negative offsets for ALU operations due to signed 16-bit off; the condition insn->off > 1 was meant to permit only 0 or 1 for BPF_MOD/BPF_DIV but accepted negatives. The fix tightens validation to (insn-&gt...

CVE-2025-40169 bpf: Reject negative offsets for ALU ops

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject negative offsets for ALU ops When verifying BPF programs, the checkaluop function validates instructions with ALU operations. The 'offset' field in these instructions is a signed 16-bit integer. The existing check...

CVE-2025-40169 bpf: Reject negative offsets for ALU ops

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject negative offsets for ALU ops When verifying BPF programs, the checkaluop function validates instructions with ALU operations. The 'offset' field in these instructions is a signed 16-bit integer. The existing check...

PT-2025-46644

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Linux kernel affected versions not specified Description A flaw exists in the Linux kernel's BPF Berkeley Packet Filter program verification process. Specifically, the check alu op function inadequately validates the 'offset' field within ALU...

TencentOS Server 4: python3.11 (TSSA-2025:0832)

The version of Tencent Linux installed on the remote TencentOS Server 4 host is prior to tested version. It is, therefore, affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the TSSA-2025:0832 advisory. Package updates are available for TencentOS Server 4 that fix the following vulnerabilities:...

OESA-2025-2577 python3 security update

Python combines remarkable power with very clear syntax. It has modules, classes, exceptions, very high level dynamic data types, and dynamic typing. There are interfaces to many system calls and libraries, as well as to various windowing systems. New built-in modules are easily written in C or C...

Medium: python3

Issue Overview: The 'zipfile' module would not check the validity of the ZIP64 End of Central Directory EOCD Locator record offset value would not be used to locate the ZIP64 EOCD record, instead the ZIP64 EOCD record would be assumed to be the previous record in the ZIP archive. This could be...

Medium: python3.9

Issue Overview: The 'zipfile' module would not check the validity of the ZIP64 End of Central Directory EOCD Locator record offset value would not be used to locate the ZIP64 EOCD record, instead the ZIP64 EOCD record would be assumed to be the previous record in the ZIP archive. This could be...

CVE-2025-4203

The wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to error‐based or time-based SQL Injection via the getmembers function in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.8 due to missing integer validation on the 'offset' and 'rowcount' parameters. The function blindly interpolates 'rowcount' into a...

CVE-2025-4203

The wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to error‐based or time-based SQL Injection via the getmembers function in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.8 due to missing integer validation on the 'offset' and 'rowcount' parameters. The function blindly interpolates 'rowcount' into a...

CVE-2025-4203 wpForo Forum <= 2.4.8 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection via get_members Function

The wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to error‐based or time-based SQL Injection via the getmembers function in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.8 due to missing integer validation on the 'offset' and 'rowcount' parameters. The function blindly interpolates 'rowcount' into a...

CVE-2025-4203 wpForo Forum <= 2.4.8 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection via get_members Function

The wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to error‐based or time-based SQL Injection via the getmembers function in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.8 due to missing integer validation on the 'offset' and 'rowcount' parameters. The function blindly interpolates 'rowcount' into a...

PT-2025-43725

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions wpForo Forum versions prior to 2.4.9 Description The wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress is susceptible to error-based or time-based SQL Injection through the get members function. This is due to a lack of integer validation on the offset and ro...

CLSA-2025-1760987651 python3: Fix of CVE-2025-8194

Bump package Release to 21.0.5 - CVE-2025-8194: tarfile: validate archives to ensure member offsets are non-negative...

BIT-PYTHON-MIN-2025-8291 ZIP64 End of Central Directory (EOCD) Locator record offset not checked

The 'zipfile' module would not check the validity of the ZIP64 End of Central Directory EOCD Locator record offset value would not be used to locate the ZIP64 EOCD record, instead the ZIP64 EOCD record would be assumed to be the previous record in the ZIP archive. This could be abused to create Z...