Lucene search
+L

253 matches found

OSV
OSV
added 2026/07/22 2:17 p.m.8 views

CVE-2026-44690

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing leads to cache poisoning that permits a malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone to poison arbitrary...

7.5CVSS5.8AI score
SaveExploits0References1
NVD
NVD
added 2026/07/22 2:17 p.m.12 views

CVE-2026-44690

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing leads to cache poisoning that permits a malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone to poison arbitrary...

7.5CVSS0.00145EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
OSV
OSV
added 2026/07/22 2:17 p.m.10 views

ALPINE-CVE-2026-46582

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.0 up to and including 1.25.1, a replay of a wildcard rrset as another piece of data, could be briefly considered DNSSEC secure based only on the RRSIG validation and stored into cache, before later validation treats it as bogus based on NSEC validation. When the resolvin...

3.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00189EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
OSV
OSV
added 2026/07/22 2:17 p.m.5 views

ALPINE-CVE-2026-44690

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing leads to cache poisoning that permits a malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone to poison arbitrary...

7.5CVSS5.7AI score0.00145EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.7 views

CVE-2026-13321 DNSSEC Validation Bypass via Out-of-Zone NSEC Next Field

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1...

8.6CVSS5.2AI score0.00223EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
AlpineLinux
AlpineLinux
added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.16 views

CVE-2026-13321

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1...

8.6CVSS5.8AI score0.00223EPSS
SaveExploits0
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.13 views

CVE-2026-13321

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1...

8.6CVSS5.2AI score0.00223EPSS
SaveExploits0References4Affected Software1
CVE
CVE
added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.115 views

CVE-2026-13321

The CVE relates to BIND DNSSEC validation: the resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records whose Next Domain Name points outside the signer's zone, enabling potential DNSSEC validation bypass. Affected are BIND 9 releases across multiple series: 9.11.0–9.18.50, 9.20.0–9.20.24, 9.21.0–9.21.23, an...

8.6CVSS5.3AI score0.00223EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.63 views

CVE-2026-13321 DNSSEC Validation Bypass via Out-of-Zone NSEC Next Field

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1...

8.6CVSS0.00223EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2026/07/22 2:15 p.m.11 views

CVE-2026-13204

If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then BIND may exit unexpectedly with an assertion while validating this proof. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through...

7.5CVSS5.3AI score0.00523EPSS
SaveExploits0References4Affected Software1
EUVD
EUVD
added 2026/07/22 2:15 p.m.13 views

EUVD-2026-47712

If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then BIND may exit unexpectedly with an assertion while validating this proof. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through...

7.5CVSS5.3AI score0.00523EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
added 2026/07/22 2:15 p.m.60 views

CVE-2026-13204

CVE-2026-13204 affects BIND 9 up to 9.18.50, 9.20.24, 9.21.23 and related S1 variants. If a provably insecure domain is covered by both NSEC and NSEC3 at the parent and an RRSIG exists for only one type, BIND may exit unexpectedly with an assertion during proof validation. Mitigation is to upgrad...

7.5CVSS5.3AI score0.00523EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2026/07/22 2:15 p.m.60 views

CVE-2026-13204 Unexpected exit in certain situations with NSEC and NSEC3 both present

If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then BIND may exit unexpectedly with an assertion while validating this proof. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through...

7.5CVSS0.00523EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2026/07/22 2:08 p.m.62 views

CVE-2026-10723 Incorrect acceptance of NSEC3 records

BIND may accept incorrect child-zone NSEC3 records as valid, which could allow an attacker to forge authenticated NXDOMAIN responses. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through...

6.8CVSS0.00272EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
added 2026/07/22 1:07 p.m.150 views

CVE-2026-46582

Affected software/versions: NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.0 up to and including 1.25.1. Issue: a replay of a wildcard RRset as another piece of data can be momentarily treated as DNSSEC secure based on RRSIG validation and cached, then misvalidated on the serve-expired path due to later NSEC validation,...

3.7CVSS5.4AI score0.00189EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2026/07/22 1:07 p.m.52 views

CVE-2026-46582 A wildcard replay, as another piece of data, triggers poisoning in the serve expired reply path

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.0 up to and including 1.25.1, a replay of a wildcard rrset as another piece of data, could be briefly considered DNSSEC secure based only on the RRSIG validation and stored into cache, before later validation treats it as bogus based on NSEC validation. When the resolvin...

3.7CVSS0.00189EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
EUVD
EUVD
added 2026/07/22 1:07 p.m.13 views

EUVD-2026-47670

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.0 up to and including 1.25.1, a replay of a wildcard rrset as another piece of data, could be briefly considered DNSSEC secure based only on the RRSIG validation and stored into cache, before later validation treats it as bogus based on NSEC validation. When the resolvin...

3.7CVSS5.4AI score0.00189EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2026/07/22 1:06 p.m.14 views

CVE-2026-44690

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing leads to cache poisoning that permits a malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone to poison arbitrary...

7.5CVSS5.4AI score0.00145EPSS
SaveExploits0References2Affected Software1
CVE
CVE
added 2026/07/22 1:06 p.m.143 views

CVE-2026-44690

The CVE-2026-44690 entry concerns NLnet Labs Unbound versions 1.7.0 through 1.25.1 where insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing enables cache poisoning. A malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone...

7.5CVSS5.5AI score0.00145EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
AlpineLinux
AlpineLinux
added 2026/07/22 1:06 p.m.9 views

CVE-2026-44690

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing leads to cache poisoning that permits a malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone to poison arbitrary...

7.5CVSS5.7AI score0.00145EPSS
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder