87 matches found
TokenBreaker
TokenBreaker Token Breaker is focused on 2 particular vulnerability related to JWT tokens. None Algorithm RSAtoHMAC Refer to this link about insights of the vulnerability and how an attacker can forge the tokens Try out this vulnerability here TheNone Usage usage: TheNone.py -h -t TOKEN...
MyJWT
MyJWT codebeat badge Introduction This cli is for pentesters, CTF players, or dev. You can modify your jwt, sign, inject ,etc... Check Documentation for more information. If you see problems or enhancement send an issue.I will respond as soon as possible. Enjoy : Documentation Documentation is...
CVE-2026-21003-JWT-none-Algorithm-Bypass-via-kid-Header-Omission
CVE-2026-21003 – JWT "none" Algorithm Bypass via kid Header Omission Program Code Node.js // jwtverifyserver.js - Vulnerable JWT verification const jwt = require'jsonwebtoken'; const express = require'express'; const app = express; app.useexpress.json; const publicKey = -----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----...
Astra Linux – Vulnerability in Ceph
Ceph is a distributed object, block, and file storage platform. In versions 19.2.3 and earlier, it is possible to send a JWT with “none” as its JWT algorithm. By doing this, the JWT signature is not checked. The vulnerability lies most likely in the RadosGW OIDC provider. As of the time of...
CVE-2026-67336
better-auth versions before 1.6.11 contain insecure cryptographic defaults in the oidcProvider and mcp plugins that advertise the none algorithm and accept plain PKCE by default. Attackers can exploit algorithm negotiation to accept unsigned tokens or intercept authorization codes when PKCE plain...
CVE-2026-67336
better-auth versions before 1.6.11 contain insecure cryptographic defaults in the oidcProvider and mcp plugins that advertise the none algorithm and accept plain PKCE by default. Attackers can exploit algorithm negotiation to accept unsigned tokens or intercept authorization codes when PKCE plain...
CVE-2026-67336 better-auth before 1.6.11 Insecure Cryptographic Defaults via oidcProvider
better-auth versions before 1.6.11 contain insecure cryptographic defaults in the oidcProvider and mcp plugins that advertise the none algorithm and accept plain PKCE by default. Attackers can exploit algorithm negotiation to accept unsigned tokens or intercept authorization codes when PKCE plain...
CVE-2026-67336 better-auth before 1.6.11 Insecure Cryptographic Defaults via oidcProvider
better-auth versions before 1.6.11 contain insecure cryptographic defaults in the oidcProvider and mcp plugins that advertise the none algorithm and accept plain PKCE by default. Attackers can exploit algorithm negotiation to accept unsigned tokens or intercept authorization codes when PKCE plain...
CVE-2026-67336
CVE-2026-67336 affects better-auth versions before 1.6.11, specifically the oidcProvider and mcp plugins. The root cause is insecure cryptographic defaults that advertise the none algorithm and allow plain PKCE by default. This can enable an attacker to exploit algorithm negotiation to accept uns...
CVE-2026-67336: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
better-auth versions before 1.6.11 contain insecure cryptographic defaults in the oidcProvider and mcp plugins that advertise the none algorithm and accept plain PKCE by default. Attackers can exploit algorithm negotiation to accept unsigned tokens or intercept authorization codes when PKCE plain...
PT-2026-59247
Summary The LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid,...
Better Auth has insecure cryptographic defaults in oidcProvider: alg=none advertised and plain PKCE accepted by default
Am I affected? Users are affected if all of the following are true: - Their application uses better-auth at a version below the patched release. - Their application enables oidcProvider from better-auth/plugins/oidc-provider or mcp from better-auth/plugins/mcp the mcp plugin delegates to...
GHSA-9H47-PQCX-HJR4 Better Auth has insecure cryptographic defaults in oidcProvider: alg=none advertised and plain PKCE accepted by default
Am I affected? Users are affected if all of the following are true: - Their application uses better-auth at a version below the patched release. - Their application enables oidcProvider from better-auth/plugins/oidc-provider or mcp from better-auth/plugins/mcp the mcp plugin delegates to...
PT-2026-67316
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions better-auth versions prior to 1.6.11 Description The oidcProvider and mcp plugins contain insecure cryptographic defaults. The discovery document advertises the none algorithm in id token signing alg values supported and resource signing alg...
WS-2015-0046
pyjwt 0.4.3 and before validation accepts any supported algorithm as valid including none...
CVE-2026-39413
LightRAG provides simple and fast retrieval-augmented generation. Prior to 1.4.14, the LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode call does not explicitly deny the 'none'...
CVE-2026-39413 LightRAG has a JWT Algorithm Confusion Vulnerability in LightRAG API
LightRAG provides simple and fast retrieval-augmented generation. Prior to 1.4.14, the LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode call does not explicitly deny the 'none'...
jwt-exploit-toolkit
JWT Exploit Toolkit !Pythonhttps://img.shields.io/badge/Py...
GHSA-8FFJ-4HX4-9PGF lightrag-hku: JWT Algorithm Confusion Vulnerability
Summary The LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid,...
lightrag-hku: JWT Algorithm Confusion Vulnerability
Summary The LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid,...