4464 matches found
ROS-2-1478
2.1478 Vulnerability in Mozilla Thunderbird email client CVE-2021-29970, CVE-2021-30547, CVE-2021-29976, CVE-2021-29969. 1. Vulnerability Description: CVE-2021-29970 Vulnerability in Mozilla Thunderbird email client, related to HTML content processing error. Exploitation of the vulnerability coul...
ROS-2-1434
2.1434 Vulnerability in Mozilla Thunderbird email client CVE-2021-29970, CVE-2021-30547, CVE-2021-29976, CVE-2021-29969. 1. Vulnerability Description: CVE-2021-29970 Vulnerability in Mozilla Thunderbird email client, related to HTML content processing error. Exploitation of the vulnerability coul...
ROS-2-1213
2.1213 Vulnerability in Mozilla Thunderbird email client CVE-2021-29970, CVE-2021-30547, CVE-2021-29976, CVE-2021-29969. 1. Vulnerability Description: CVE-2021-29970 Vulnerability in Mozilla Thunderbird email client, related to HTML content processing error. Exploitation of the vulnerability coul...
ROS-2-924
2.924 Vulnerability in Mozilla Thunderbird email client CVE-2021-29970, CVE-2021-30547, CVE-2021-29976, CVE-2021-29969. 1. Vulnerability Description: CVE-2021-29970 Vulnerability in Mozilla Thunderbird email client, related to HTML content processing error. Exploitation of the vulnerability could...
CVE-2021-44273
e2guardian v5.4.x = v5.4.3r is affected by missing SSL certificate validation in the SSL MITM engine. In standalone mode i.e., acting as a proxy or a transparent proxy, with SSL MITM enabled, e2guardian, if built with OpenSSL v1.1.x, did not validate hostnames in certificates of the web servers...
CVE-2021-44273
e2guardian v5.4.x = v5.4.3r is affected by missing SSL certificate validation in the SSL MITM engine. In standalone mode i.e., acting as a proxy or a transparent proxy, with SSL MITM enabled, e2guardian, if built with OpenSSL v1.1.x, did not validate hostnames in certificates of the web servers...
CVE-2021-44273
e2guardian v5.4.x = v5.4.3r is affected by missing SSL certificate validation in the SSL MITM engine. In standalone mode i.e., acting as a proxy or a transparent proxy, with SSL MITM enabled, e2guardian, if built with OpenSSL v1.1.x, did not validate hostnames in certificates of the web servers...
Design/Logic Flaw
e2guardian v5.4.x = v5.4.3r is affected by missing SSL certificate validation in the SSL MITM engine. In standalone mode i.e., acting as a proxy or a transparent proxy, with SSL MITM enabled, e2guardian, if built with OpenSSL v1.1.x, did not validate hostnames in certificates of the web servers...
CVE-2021-44273
The CVE-2021-44273 issue affects e2guardian v5.4.x and earlier up to v5.4.3r. In standalone proxy mode with SSL MITM enabled, and when built against OpenSSL v1.1.x, the SSL MITM engine did not validate hostnames of upstream web servers, enabling potential MITM attacks. Public sources confirm the ...
CVE-2021-44273
e2guardian v5.4.x = v5.4.3r is affected by missing SSL certificate validation in the SSL MITM engine. In standalone mode i.e., acting as a proxy or a transparent proxy, with SSL MITM enabled, e2guardian, if built with OpenSSL v1.1.x, did not validate hostnames in certificates of the web servers...
CVE-2021-44273
e2guardian v5.4.x = v5.4.3r is affected by missing SSL certificate validation in the SSL MITM engine. In standalone mode i.e., acting as a proxy or a transparent proxy, with SSL MITM enabled, e2guardian, if built with OpenSSL v1.1.x, did not validate hostnames in certificates of the web servers...
CVE-2021-41067
An issue was discovered in Listary through 6. Improper implementation of the update process leads to the download of software updates with a /check-update HTTP-based connection. This can be exploited with MITM techniques. Together with the lack of package validation, it can lead to manipulation o...
Design/Logic Flaw
An issue was discovered in Listary through 6. Improper implementation of the update process leads to the download of software updates with a /check-update HTTP-based connection. This can be exploited with MITM techniques. Together with the lack of package validation, it can lead to manipulation o...
CVE-2021-41067
An issue was discovered in Listary through 6. Improper implementation of the update process leads to the download of software updates with a /check-update HTTP-based connection. This can be exploited with MITM techniques. Together with the lack of package validation, it can lead to manipulation o...
CVE-2021-41067
The CVE-2021-41067 issue affects Listary up to version 6, caused by an improper update process and lack of package validation. Updates are fetched over a /check-update HTTP-based channel, enabling MITM manipulation of update packages and potentially resulting in installation of malicious content....
Security Bulletin: IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is vulnerable to SSRF, MITM, and CORS attacks
Summary IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery SSRF, Man-in-the-Middle MITM attack, and Cross-Origin Resource Sharing CORS attack. Vulnerability Details CVEID: CVE-2021-39057 DESCRIPTION: IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is vulnerable to server-side request forgery SSRF...
FortiClientEMS & FortiClient - Telemetry protocol is vulnerable to a MitM Vulnerability
A combination of a use of hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability CWE-321 in FortiClientEMS and an improper certificate validation vulnerability CWE-297 in FortiClientWindows, FortiClientLinux and FortiClientMac may allow an unauthenticated and network adjacent attacker to perform a...
Updated gfbgraph packages fix security vulnerability
In GNOME libgfbgraph through 0.2.4, gfbgraph-photo.c does not enable TLS certificate verification on the SoupSessionSync objects it creates, leaving users vulnerable to network MITM attacks. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2016-20011...
MGASA-2021-0530 Updated gfbgraph packages fix security vulnerability
In GNOME libgfbgraph through 0.2.4, gfbgraph-photo.c does not enable TLS certificate verification on the SoupSessionSync objects it creates, leaving users vulnerable to network MITM attacks. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2016-20011...
CVE-2020-27414
Mahavitaran android application 7.50 and prior transmit sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header, MITM or browser history...