LSP6KeyManagerCore reentrancy vulnerability

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Both LSP6KeyManager and LSP6KeyManagerInit inherit from LSP6KeyManagerCore. Consider our previous 3 contracts as A, B and C. We write a contract D, call the A.execute method, and let it execute D.execute. When executing D.execute, we can also execute...

ROS-2-1301

2.1301 Vulnerability in Mozilla Thunderbird email client CVE-2021-29970, CVE-2021-30547, CVE-2021-29976, CVE-2021-29969. 1. Vulnerability Description: CVE-2021-29970 Vulnerability in Mozilla Thunderbird email client, related to HTML content processing error. Exploitation of the vulnerability coul...

stealth of funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details CRITICAL Impact The LSP0ERC725Account contract executes calls to specified targets provided in the arguments, the contract can receive native coins using the payable functions or directly transfered since the contract implements a receive function. However, the...

zenessis.com Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3479952

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

GHSA-W24W-WP77-QFFM CometBFT may duplicate transactions in the mempool's data structures

Impact The mempool maintains two data structures to keep track of outstanding transactions: a list and a map. These two data structures are supposed to be in sync all the time in the sense that the map tracks the index if any of the transaction in the list. Unfortunately, it is possible to have...

CometBFT may duplicate transactions in the mempool's data structures

Impact The mempool maintains two data structures to keep track of outstanding transactions: a list and a map. These two data structures are supposed to be in sync all the time in the sense that the map tracks the index if any of the transaction in the list. Unfortunately, it is possible to have...

XSS vulnerabilities via various embeds

Description JSFiddle, Gliffy, Otter and Tldraw embeds lack sufficient input validation. Every one of them can be abused to achieve a stored XSS on a main application domain. This XSS triggers for everyone viewing the document. Proof of Concept PoC file is different for each vulnerable embed. See...

CVE-2023-3089

A compliance problem was found in the Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. Red Hat discovered that, when FIPS mode was enabled, not all of the cryptographic modules in use were FIPS-validated. Mitigation Red Hat has investigated whether a possible mitigation exists for this issue, and has not be...

Functions don't update after being called

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Without updating the reserve or vault value of tokens after calling different functions, the contract may be prone to inconsistent state, security issues, financial implications, and bad user experience. It is important to review and update the reserve...

Unable to check state() if proposalId == 0

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact state function cannot be called to view proposal state if proposalId == 0. Proof of Concept There is no check to prevent queueing a proposalId with a value of 0 via the queue function. However, in the state function there is a check preventing using a...

Potential Loss of Funds Due to Zero Slippage Hardcoding in TalosBaseStrategy#deposit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the deposit function within the TalosBaseStrategy contract, both slippage for two tokens amount0Min and amount1Min are hardcoded to zero. This can have severe implications as users may unintentionally accept a minimum of zero output tokens from a swap...

changeAdmin function does not have checks

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact changeAdmin does not check for new address which should be different than the old one. Also newAdmin should not be same as the carrying out the transaction. Proof of Concept Tools Used VScode Recommended Mitigation Steps CEI to be placed in context of...

User may get less tokens than expected when collateral list order changes

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The order of ts.collateralList is not stable: Whenever LibSetters.revokeCollateral is used to revoke a collateral, it may change because of the swap that is performed. However, the function Redeemer.redeem relies on this order, as the user has to provide...

Bad accounting on ERC4626MultiToken.sol leads to user funds stuck in the contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Bad accounting on ERC4626MultiToken.sol leads to user funds stuck in the contract on deposit and withdraw logic. Vulnerability Detail The UlyssesToken unified liquidity tokens are derived from ERC4626Multitoken. This is an standard tokenized vault with...

BranchBridgeAgent invokes anyCall with PAY ON SOURCE but doesn't send value with it. All calls will fail.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact IAnycallProxy.anyCall operates under one of two modes of taking fees, namely fees are taken either on source or on the destination chain. Fee mode is decided by the caller with an appropriate value of the fourth parameter, ie. uint256 flag . Values 0,4...

Tokens with multiple addresses can be stolen due to reliance on balanceOf()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some ERC20 tokens have multiple valid contract addresses that serve as entrypoints for manipulating the same underlying storage such as Synthetix tokens like SNX and sBTC and the TUSD stablecoin. The accrueUser function holds all rewards for all pools,...

Not using slippage parameter when interacting with AMMs

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The slippage parameters are hardcoded to 0, meaning the minimum amount can be 0. The absence of slippage protection causes transactions to be vulnerable to front running. This can result in users potentially losing their funds. Proof of Concept...

Incorrect usage of Comparison Operator(==) instead of Asignment Operator(=) in PartnerManagerFactory

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The incorrect usage of comparison operator instead of an assignment operator in addPartner and addVault functions could lead to undesirable behaviour. While the mapping partnerIds and vaultIds are supposed to keep track of the IDs, due to the error, thes...

NO CHECK TO VERIFY THE ELEMENTS OF assetsAmounts[] ARRAY IS IN THE SAME ORDER AS assets[] ARRAY, IF MISCONFIGURED COULD BREAK THE INTERNAL ACCOUNTING OF SHARE CALCULATION

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the ERC4626MultiToken.convertToShares function, assetsAmounts are used to calculate the shares to mint. Here the assetsAmounts are expected to be passed in the order of the assets array. If there is any misconfiguration in the order, then it will affe...

Reactivated gauges have incorrect accounting for the last cycle’s rewards

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact reactivated gauges that previously had queued up rewards have a mismatch between their storedCycle and contract’s gaugeCycle state variable. Due to this mismatch, there is also a resulting issue with the accounting logic for its completed rewards: Proof ...