gcc security update

gcc el8 8.5.0-18.0.5 - CVE-2023-4039 GCC mitigation. Orabug 35751743. Includes removal of aarch64-preserve-args.patch. - CVE-2022-40982 'Intel Downfall' mitigation. Orabug 35751810. Add two patches originally from GCC upstream releases/gcc-11 branch. with major adjustment...

Siemens SIMATIC IPCs

As of January 10, 2023, CISA will no longer be updating ICS security advisories for Siemens product vulnerabilities beyond the initial advisory. For the most up-to-date information on vulnerabilities in this advisory, please see Siemens' ProductCERT Security Advisories CERT Services | Services |...

CVE-2019-7819

Adobe Acrobat Reader versions 2019.010.20098 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass mitigations such as ASLR. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in...

CVE-2023-31417

A flaw was found in the Elasticsearch package. Elasticsearch filters out sensitive information and credentials before logging into the audit log. It was found that this filtering was not applied when requests to Elasticsearch use certain deprecated URIs for APIs. As a result, sensitive informatio...

GHSA-P45J-VFV5-WPRQ RKE2 supervisor port is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote denial-of-service (DoS) attack via TLS SAN stuffing attack

Impact An issue was found in RKE2 where an attacker with network access to RKE2 servers' supervisor port TCP 9345 can force the TLS server to add entries to the certificate's Subject Alternative Name SAN list, through a stuffing attack, until the certificate grows so large that it exceeds the...

RKE2 supervisor port is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote denial-of-service (DoS) attack via TLS SAN stuffing attack

Impact An issue was found in RKE2 where an attacker with network access to RKE2 servers' supervisor port TCP 9345 can force the TLS server to add entries to the certificate's Subject Alternative Name SAN list, through a stuffing attack, until the certificate grows so large that it exceeds the...

K3s apiserver port is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote denial-of-service (DoS) attack via TLS SAN stuffing attack

Impact An issue was found in K3s where an attacker with network access to K3s servers' apiserver/supervisor port TCP 6443 can force the TLS server to add entries to the certificate's Subject Alternative Name SAN list, through a stuffing attack, until the certificate grows so large that it exceeds...

Compound charges are sent to GeVault, making them potentially vulnerable to theft

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the previous version, the compound fee would be saved in the TokenisableRange before being deposited into LP, and would be deposited into LP after reaching 1%. After reconstruction, the fees are sent directly to GeVault for distribution through getTVL...

The roerouter hard-coded address error causes all fee funds to be sent to the treasury instead of the vault

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The roerouter hard-coded address error causes all fee funds to be sent to the treasury instead of the vault. This will reduce the capital utilization rate, because the fee should be added to the LP to earn interest, but now because the vault address cann...

Incorrect delegate token URI in MarketMetadata.sol.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Web3 logic may be error prone by the wrong delegate token URL. Proof of Concept In DelegateToken.tokenURL, MarketMetadata.delegateTokenURI is called. MarketMetadata.delegateTokenURI is as follows. File: MarketMetadata.sol 37: function...

CreateOffererLib#createOrderHash function can be front-run by attacker and cause user create order failed

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function CreateOffererLibcalculateOrderHashAndId is used to calculate ERC20/ERC721/ERC1155 order hash and delegateTokenId. It create delegateTokenId parameter by calling DelegateTokenStorageHelpersdelegateIdNoRevert function, this function calculate...

Lack of access control lets anyone rescind any delegate token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is no access control for the function rescind, thus 1 it lets anyone rescind any token, either he is the owner or not and 2 the documentation does not adhere to the current implementation. Proof of Concept The documentation above the definition of...

Unchecked return value of low level

Lines of code Vulnerability details In the code you provided earlier, there is a potential "Unchecked return value of low-level call" vulnerability in the following line: addressstrategy.delegatecallabi.encodeWithSignature"harvest"; This line of code uses the delegatecall function to invoke the...

An attacker can steal assets due to an incorrect revertInvalidWithdrawalConditions check in DelegateToken.withdraw()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function withdraw - allows principal rights owner or approved operator to withdraw the underlying token once the delegation rights have either met their expiration or been rescinded. To withdraw assets, a check is made that the assets are being withdrawn...

Return value of ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It is recommended that the return values of ether transfers be checked, however if transfer to the hardcoded address fails, it does not revert. Proof of Concept uint256 sc = uint256uint1600x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000; assembly "memory-safe"...

The validateCreateOrderHash function is vulnerable to an incorrect token type being provided by the caller

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Invalid token types could be used with encoded order info, breaking expectations of the contract. An attacker could create an order hash using different parameters than what is actually encoded in the orderInfo. This could potentially allow the attacker ...

Attacker can extract value from pool by sandwiching herself at swapAll during close

Lines of code Vulnerability details Attacker can drain the lending pool by leveraging two facts: 1. swapAll allows 1% slippage 2. There is no Health Factor check after close. Alice and Bob are good friends, the steps are in one single tx: 1. Alice deposits 10000 USDT and borrows 7000$ worth of TR...

yryryserywretsh

Lines of code L1 Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots, logs, or any other relevant proof that illustrates the concept. Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps Assess...

There is a potential vulnerability with the nonce not incrementing as expected if there is an error or revert during the seaport flow

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This would allow the attacker to reuse the same nonce in multiple seaport transactions by reverting the first transaction after processNonce increments the stored nonce. Proof of Concept There is a potential issue with the nonce not incrementing as...

The owner of the PrincipalToken can redeem the asset from escrow before the selected time period expires

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact After calling the create function, the owner of the DelegateToken gains delegate rights for the duration of the escrow. The documentation for the competition states: "The holder of the PrincipalToken will have the right to redeem the boredom ape from...