PT-2025-13307 · Linux +5 · Linux Kernel +5

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Linux kernel affected versions not specified Description: The issue concerns a potential vm use-after-free in the Linux kernel, specifically in the drm/i915 component. This occurs when the vm is added to the vm xa table, making it visible to...

The validateCreateOrderHash function is vulnerable to an incorrect token type being provided by the caller

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Invalid token types could be used with encoded order info, breaking expectations of the contract. An attacker could create an order hash using different parameters than what is actually encoded in the orderInfo. This could potentially allow the attacker ...

GaugeController.remove_gauge() may indefinitely trap user voting power

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Users will permanently lose voting power equal to their power used to vote in the removed gauge unless the gauge is re-added and users re-vote to remove their voting power from the gauge. Proof of Concept GaugeController.sol does not have any function fo...

cleanup() does not properly handle debt repayment

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The cleanup... function in the PositionManager.sol contract is used to deposit remaining users assets back to ROE, repaying debt if any. However the users debt will not be repaid if the user has debt leading to loss of funds for the lenders and the proje...

Malicious actors could pass in huge arrays to disrupt service availability (DOS) in the updateVotingPower function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The contract is stopped from being usable by legitimate users if the attacker repeatedly spammed large arrays Proof of Concept The updateVotingPower function currently only checks that the array is = 50: While 50 may be a reasonable limit for normal usag...

Lack of deep validation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The validate functions are just checking the parameters type without checking any further information Proof of Concept They are just trying to cast the value with i.TYPE and check if there is an error. There is no further validations e. g...

Check if the token of projectId matches the projectToken of the JBXBuybackDelegate

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact At line 202, the amountReceived returned by the swap function is based on the projectToken defined in JBXBuybackDelegate. This will incorrectly trigger the mint function and because there is no verification of projectToken, it will mistakenly mint...

Wrong use of the deadline for the swapExactTokensForTokens function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact deadline: Unix timestamp after which the transaction will revert. uniswap api docs. Venus sets the deadline to block.timestamp, then the transaction will never revert. Proof of Concept Transactions may be blocked resulting in transactions using unintende...

Use of strict condition can be manipulated

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The use of strict condition can be manipulated by attackers, which can lead to unforeseen consequences. Use = and = instead. Proof of Concept Tools Used Manual review Recommended Mitigation Steps Use loose condition instead like = and = instead. --- The...

The transferFeesFrom function does not check if the "from" address is the actual owner of the position before transferring the fees.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The code Doesn't check if the from address is the owner of the position before transferring the fees. If the from address is not the owner of the position, an attacker could potentially transfer fees from another user's position without their permission...

PT-2023-14920 · Alotcer · Alotcer - Ar7088H-A

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Alotcer - AR7088H-A firmware version 16.10.3 Description: The issue concerns an information disclosure where an unspecified error message contains the default administrator user name. Recommendations: For Alotcer - AR7088H-A firmware version...

recoverTimelock can have a value shorter than the winner's deadline to claim

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The value of recoverTimelock is checked to be greater than a week and less than a year, but it should never be allowed to be shorter than block.timestamp + settings.drawBufferTime, which is the time given to the winner to claim the NFT. Otherwise it coul...

A malicious user can steal all the excess balance on the pool by calling the execute function with higher amount than the selling amount

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When an order is matched, the Buyer has the option to pay in either ETH, WETH or via the Pool contract. The Exchange smart contract implements a function returnDust which returns the extra ETH to the user, if she overpays. The function is implemented in...

Adversary can cause malicious slashing of operators by setting gas price low

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Operators are maliciously slashed Proof of Concept The gas price and limit can be set to whatever the user wishes when calling the bridge. A malicious user could set the gas prices to be low for current chain conditions. This would allow them to use up t...

PT-2022-23910

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Shinken Monitoring version 2.4.3 Description The issue is related to Incorrect Access Control. The SafeUnpickler class found in shinken/safepickle.py implements a weak authentication scheme when unserializing objects passed from monitoring nod...

The execution of an order transfers 1 token regardless of Order.amount

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An order can be placed for an arbitrary amount, which is relevant for ERC1155. But when matched and executed only 1 token is transferred. This can lead to problems with accounting for the user, expecting a transfer of Order.amount tokens, potentially wit...

Lack of check for contract existance can cause loss of funds during transfers

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The current transfers will not check if the to address is for an existing token contract. This can cause loss of funds if an user attempts to make a swap for a tokens added to a pool and destructed later. Proof of Concept TokenA gets added to a pool The...

Initial price for the pool can be set by anyone

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The initial price for the pool can be initiated by anyone because there is no modifier existed to block anyone from calling initialize function. Proof of Concept function initializeuint160 initialPrice external override requireglobalState.price == 0, 'AI...

Wrong balanceOf user after minting legendary gobbler

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In ArtGobblers.mintLegendaryGobbler function, line 458 calculates the number of gobblers user owned after minting // We subtract the amount of gobblers burned, and then add 1 to factor in the new legendary. getUserDatamsg.sender.gobblersOwned =...

Project.raiseDispute() might work with the already completed task.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Project.raiseDispute might work with the already completed task. Already completed tasks can't be changed in any cases and it might bring some unexpected outcome when the dispute is approved by fault. Proof of Concept It's impossible to change anything...