Minter can censor GATEKEEPER and mint uncollateralized for a prolonged period of time

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Ethena explicitly mentions their protection against a compromised minter, the mentioned maximum loss is $100.000. The protection against a compromised minter rests on the GATEKEEPER role which is a system running on AWS set to remove the minter if mints...

Temporary DOS attack on users minting and redeeming big amount using EthenaMinting.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The users redeeming and minting using EthenaMinting.sol with a large amount can be vulnerable to DOS attack. Proof of Concept There is a limit on the max amount to redeem and mint in a block. This can be crucial to the users that are minting or redeeming...

EthenaMinting.sol#_setMaxRedeemPerBlock() - Function doesn't enforce any constraints

Lines of code Vulnerability details Explanation The EthenaMinting.solsetMaxMintPerBlock function is responsible for setting the maximum limit for minting USDe tokens in a single block. function setMaxMintPerBlockuint256 maxMintPerBlock external onlyRoleDEFAULTADMINROLE...

bad Actor can block the operation of mint by creating duplicate order by frunt runing original order

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact bad Actor can block the operation of mint by creating duplicate order by frunt runing original order So basically the contracts are doing orders by users RFQ to system whether by API or front end. and make the mint process the problem is in the contract...

CVE-2023-42449

Hydra is the two-layer scalability solution for Cardano. Prior to version 0.13.0, it is possible for a malicious head initializer to extract one or more PTs for the head they are initializing due to incorrect data validation logic in the head token minting policy which then results in an flawed...

Irrevocable token holders can instantly mint a revocable token after burning and bypass the minimum XVS stake for revocable tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When an irrevocable token is burned by the admin, the holder should go through the 90 day staking period again before accruing rewards. However, the holder can exploit the protocol to immediately begin accruing rewards after burning. Furthermore, the...

Staking period reset to zero

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The claim function checks if the user has staked 1,000 XVS for 100 days and then sets stakedAtmsg.sender = 0.Meaning, it sets the staked period for that certain user to zero. Then,it calls the mint function.The mint function then checks if the user alrea...

Attacker can mint afEth with cheaper price

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Attacker can mint afEth with cheaper price and then withdraw. Proof of Concept When user would like to buy some amount of afEth tokens, then price is calculated. This price will be used to calculate amount of tokens to mint. function price public view...

Unchecked Minting

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is a possibility, an attacker can force minting of tokens to self or any other diluting the token value and stealing funds in the process Proof of Concept Here is a step-by-step process The attacker calls the transferFrom function with msg.data...

GeVault LP calculations do not use scaling and are vulnerable to deposit attacks

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Currently, getTVL counts all token balances in GeVault, and attackers can manipulate getTVL to implement deposit attacks. Secondly, since the calculation of LP does not use scaling, because there is a precision error in the division, the cost for the...

Missing Ownership Check in mint Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description: The mint function in the PrincipalToken contract lacks a crucial ownership check before allowing token minting. While it correctly checks if the caller is the delegateToken contract to restrict minting to authorized contracts, it doesn't verify if...

Lack of Post-Allowance Verification Before Token Minting

Lines of code Vulnerability details The code checks if the user txn.sender is allowed via the ALLOWLIST. If not, it sets the user's status to "allowed". However, after this step, there's no subsequent verification to ensure the user has indeed been added to the ALLOWLIST before minting tokens to...

Lack of an option in DestinationBridge.sol to cancel a transaction can lead to unwanted transactions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact DestinationBridge.sol is for handling calls from Axelar Gateway and must be deployed in the destination chain. DestinationBridge.sol requires that the address from which Axelar messages are sent must be registered in the recipient's contract. Once a...

User will loss his funds forever if Threshold are not met .

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact mintIfThresholdMet function is called from execute function while executing a bridging transaction . This function checks if thresholds are met and only mints token in the destination chain to the user if thresholds are met properly . However , the probl...

Calculating the previous pool's 'cumulativeRewardFactor' from the current pool incorrectly calculates the reward.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When we updated a transcoder with rewards and then try to update a transcoder with fees, it incorrectly calculates the reward generated in the current round for that transcoder, which also incorrectly calculates the previous pool's cumulativeRewardFactor...

TokenisableRange.sol claimFee function allows more slippage than intended due to incorrect calculation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In TokenisableRange.sol, claimFee collects swap fees generated in uniswap and compound these fees by minting to Uniswap pool. During minting collected fees back in uniswap, slippage protection is conducted by comparing addedValue - a value based on added...

TokenisableRange.sol does not have onERC721Received

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact TokenisableRange.sol will be unable to mint Uniswap NFTs without a ERC721 Receiver. Proof of Concept TokenisableRange.sol intends to create liquidity NFTs using Uniswapv3 NonfungiblePositionManager. However, there is no callback to check onERC721Received...

Broker Address can be Claim by a MEV Bot

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If the broker address is a malicious user, he can mint as many OTAP as he wants. Proof of Concept Protocol deploy the OTAP contract A Bot wait until the contract is deployed Then call the "brokerClaim" straight away with his own address. He can then call...

No slippage control while minting GLP

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact glpRewardRouter.mintAndStakeGlpaddressweth, wethAmount, 0, 0; Here, minUSDG = 0 and minGlp = 0 means no slippage checks. This can be sandwitched in certain conditions in which delta between min and max glp price is higher due to following factors: delta...

Re-entrancy in flash minting USDO can bypass max checks

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact function flashLoan IERC3156FlashBorrower receiver, address token, uint256 amount, bytes calldata data external override notPaused returns bool // @audit re-enter and mint requiretoken == addressthis, "USDO: token not valid"; requiremaxFlashLoantoken =...