1457 matches found
CVE-2018-13068: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for AzurionToken AZU, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13087: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Coinstar CSTR, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13084: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Good Time Coin GTY, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13079: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GoodTo GTO, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
PT-2018-11585
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Plaza Token PLAZA affected versions not specified Description The issue concerns an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Plaza Token PLAZA, an Ethereum token. This overflow allows the owner of the...
PT-2018-11580
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions GoodTo GTO affected versions not specified Description The issue concerns an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation. This overflow allows the contract owner to set the balance of any user to any value...
PT-2018-11582
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Goutex GTX affected versions not specified Description The issue concerns an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation. This overflow allows the contract owner to set the balance of any user to any value...
PT-2018-11571
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions EncryptedToken ECC affected versions not specified Description The issue concerns an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for EncryptedToken ECC, an Ethereum token. This overflow allows the owner of the...
CVE-2018-13070: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for EncryptedToken ECC, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13077: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CTB, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13069: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DYchain DYC, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13076: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Betcash BC, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
Unspecified Vulnerability in BitAsean tradeTrap
BitAsean BAS is a tradable Ether ERC20 token. A security vulnerability exists in BitAsean tradeTrap. The vulnerability stems from the fact that the mintToken function of BitAsean BAS's smart contract implementation has no expiration date constraints. The vulnerability could be exploited by an own...
Design/Logic Flaw
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
CVE-2018-12081
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
CVE-2018-12082
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
Code injection
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
Code injection
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PolyAI AI, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
CVE-2018-12079
CVE-2018-12079 affects Substratum (SUB) ERC20 token contracts. The mintToken function lacks a period constraint, allowing the owner to arbitrarily increase total supply (tradeTrap), enabling potential profit extraction. Documented impact indicates ability to inflate supply without explicit period...
CVE-2018-12080
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...