CVE-2018-13080: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Goutex GTX, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13068: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for AzurionToken AZU, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13072: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Coffeecoin COFFEE, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13084: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Good Time Coin GTY, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13087: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Coinstar CSTR, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13092: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Reimburse Token REIM, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13073: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ETHEREUMBLACK ETCBK, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13071: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CCindex10 T10, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13089: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Universal Coin UCOIN, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13070: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for EncryptedToken ECC, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13081: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GZS Token GZS, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13078: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Jitech JTH, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

Unspecified Vulnerability in BitAsean tradeTrap

BitAsean BAS is a tradable Ether ERC20 token. A security vulnerability exists in BitAsean tradeTrap. The vulnerability stems from the fact that the mintToken function of BitAsean BAS's smart contract implementation has no expiration date constraints. The vulnerability could be exploited by an own...

Code injection

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PolyAI AI, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12081

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Code injection

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12082

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

Design/Logic Flaw

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12080

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

CVE-2018-12078

The CVE-2018-12078 entry describes a vulnerability in the mintToken function of PolyAI (AI), an ERC20 smart contract, where there is no period constraint. This allows the owner to arbitrarily increase the total supply, enabling profit through dilution. The provided documents do not include exploi...