ERC4626Cloned deposit and mint logic differ on first deposit

Lines of code Vulnerability details The ERC4626Cloned contract is an implementation of the ERC4626 used for vaults. The standard contains a deposit function to deposit a specific amount of the underlying asset, and a mint function that will calculate the amount needed of the underlying token to...

RuniverseLand mint function does not work

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The function mint of RuniverseLand will not work and seemingly unnecessary Proof of Concept RuniverseLand.sol has a public function mint that can be used to mint a new plot. Note that this function uses numMinted as a new token ID while numMinted denotes...

Groupbuy: Construction of merkle tree allows some unintended IDs to be bought

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In GroupBuy.purchase, when no proof is provided, it is required that the provided token ID is equal to the stored merkleRoot: if purchaseProof.length == 0 // Hashes tokenId to verify merkle root if proof is empty if bytes32tokenId != merkleRoot revert...

Ignored return value from "IERC20.transferFrom()"

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The return value from IERC20.transferFrom in "StableVault" was not checked, a malicious actor could first deposit a number of tokens without actually having it and then subsequently withdraw that amount of tokens from the "StableVault" Proof of Concept...

[NAZ-H1] Reentrancy From Use of _safeMint()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The mint function is used to mint a new position NFT and is only callable by minter. This function uses safeMint to mint these position NFTs which has been known in the past to have Reentrancy issues. Proof of Concept The dangers of surprising code by...

PT-2022-28230 · Unknown · Candy Machine V2

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Candy Machine V2 Description: A problem with Candy Machine V2 allows minting NFTs to an arbitrary collection due to a missing check. The issue can be exploited through a specific transaction sequence, involving two instructions. The first...

PrePOMarket.sol : a sender who is not included in the account list can front run and mint prior to setting the _mintHook

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact a sender who is not included in the account list can front run and mint prior to setting the mintHook. Proof of Concept The contract says, Minting will only be done by the team, and thus relies on the mintHook to enforce access controls. This is also why...

Mint might result in too few tokens minted

Lines of code Vulnerability details mint of PrePOMarket.sol allows the team to mint new short and long tokens in exchange for collateral tokens. Long and short tokens are default ERC20 tokens with 18 decimals, while the collateral ERC20 token uses the decimals of the underlying base token. Howeve...

The Ether for an LPDA mint sale can be locked in the LPDA contract indefinitely

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact After a mint sale using LPDA, all the Ether can be locked in the LPDA contract indefinitely. Proof of Concept In the src/minters/ contracts, the .transfer function is used for sending Ether. It is used for sending fees to the feeReceiver, and in the...

The LPDA will fail, because the Arithmetic underflow

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The LPDA will fail to buy mint new NFTs even if block.timestamp = temp.startTime , block.timestamp = temp.endTime and newId sale.dropPerSecond sale.endTime - sale.startTime, "INVALID DROP PER SECOND"; --- The text was updated successfully, but th...

Need to check the _mint() status before increment the token count .

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Its possible to increase the tokenIdTracker even mint function failed. The mint status must be checked before increment tokenIdTracker value . Proof of Concept function registeraddress recipient public onlyUnregistered returns uint256 tokenId address...

_expectMint is not checked when tokenId != 0

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the mintBestAvailableTier function from the JBTiered721Delegate contract the expectMint variable is used to determine if the user is expecting the contract to mint tokens with the left over funds or not, but the boolean value of expectMint is only...

Loss of user funds by balance manipulation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Breaking of the accounting logic, loss of user funds Proof of Concept The project uses LBPair's mint function to mint LBTokens to the user with additional safety checks when the user provides liquidity to the pair...

Self-transferring LBToken can lead to unlimited mint

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The implementation of the transfer function in LBToken.sol doesn't check for self-transfers, leading to users being able to mint an unlimited amount of tokens to themselves. The function caches the balance of the sender L182 and receiver L188 before addi...

didPay() receives payment but does not mint NFT to beneficiary as expected.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The function JB721Delegate.didPay is expected to mint an NFT to the beneficiary if conditions are met. However the function only receives payment through payable, but does nothing else in the processPayment call if function does not revert. The expected...

Owner can set contribution floor to 0 , meaning the user lose the fund / fee for 0 contribution power NFT and NFT have no redemption weight

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Owner can set contribution floor to 0, meaning the user lose the fund / fee for 0 contribution power NFT and NFT have no redemption weight. the normal payment flow for user is Payment Terminal - pay - didPay - processPayment - // Mint rewards if they wer...

Warpinator 后置链接漏洞

Warpinator is an open source file sharing library for Linux Mint that shares files across a LAN. Files are sent and received over the local network. A security vulnerability exists in Warpinator that stems from allowing access to directories other than those intended, such as symbolic directory...

After pool is initialized, user can perform a sandwich attack through front-running and back-running mint transaction by calling swap function twice to manipulate initial price to be much different than market price and gain much more of output token than expected

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact After the following initialize function is called, the pool does not own any of the tokens at that moment since the mint function below is not called yet. When the mint transaction is sent, a malicious user can notice it in the mempool and front-run it b...

the validator would able to manipulate the Time Stamp ant

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact attacker able to make manipulation in the function of pageprice Proof of Concept validators can make some manipulation in the timestamp. bob validator even if can make time stamp manipulation or 2 secend able to call function faster than others then mint...

The mintLegendaryGobbler function does not delete the getApproved of the normal Gobbler, which would cause the sacrificed Gobbler to be transferred

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the mintLegendaryGobbler function, the getApproved of the normal Gobbler is not deleted when the normal Gobbler is used to mint the legendary Gobbler, which results in the sacrificed Gobbler being able to be transferred in the transferFrom function. f...