Integer Overflow

@openzeppelin/confidential-contracts is vulnerable to Integer Overflow. The vulnerability is due to a silent overflow failure in the internal mint function that is not checked by wrapper functions, which allows an attacker to cause minting to fail silently while still transferring underlying...

EUVD-2018-5457

Malware in sbrugna...

EUVD-2018-3372

Malware in sbrugna...

EUVD-2018-5077

Malware in sbrugna...

EUVD-2018-3460

Malware in sbrugna...

EUVD-2018-5664

Malware in sbrugna...

CVE-2024-51427

An issue in the PepeGxng smart contract which can be run on the Ethereum blockchain allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via the mint function. NOTE: this is disputed by third parties because the impact is limited to function calls...

CVE-2018-13128

Etherty Token ETY is a smart contract running on Ethereum. The mint function has an integer overflow that allows minted tokens to be arbitrarily retrieved by the contract owner...

CVE-2018-13129

SP8DE Token SPX is a smart contract running on Ethereum. The mint function has an integer overflow that allows minted tokens to be arbitrarily retrieved by the contract owner...

CVE-2018-13132

Spadeico is a smart contract running on Ethereum. The mint function has an integer overflow that allows minted tokens to be arbitrarily retrieved by the contract owner...

PT-2024-34630 · Ethereum · Ethereum

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: PepeGxng smart contract affected versions not specified Ethereum version 1.12.2 Description: An issue in the PepeGxng smart contract, which can be run on the Ethereum blockchain, allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via the...

Ethereum 安全漏洞

Ethereum is a public cryptocurrency platform of the Ethereum organization. A security vulnerability exists in Ethereum version v.1.12.2, which stems from a vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the PepeGxng smart contract mint function...

Mint function can exceeds a predefined limitin when flationRemainder function exist overflow at OLAS.sol contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact mint function can exceeds a predefined limit when inflationRemainder function exist overflow at OLAS.sol contract Proof of Concept 1.First call Burn function,Burn function call burn can cause overflow, we can get a big totalSupply. 2.Second call mint. At...

Use SafeMath for overflow protection

Lines of code Vulnerability details Unchecked math could potentially trigger overflows. Recommendation: Utilize SafeMath library for overflow safe operations. using SafeMath for uint256; function mintaddress account, uint256 amount public onlyOwner // Overflow protected totalSupply =...

Reentrancy in mint function allows minting above the limit allowed per address / allowlisted address

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The mint function in NextGenCore.sol doesn't follow the checks-effects-interactions pattern and can be reentered through the onERC721Received function, if the receiver is a contract. The state variables written after the call are...

asD TOKEN CREATOR CAN PROFIT UNFAIRLY FROM THE cNote TOKENS DIRECLTY TRANSFERRED TO THE asD.sol CONTRACT

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The asD.withdrawCarry function is used to withdraw the interest that accrued in the asD contract in the form of NOTE tokens. Only the owner of the asD token is able to withdraw the interest accrued since the withdrawCarry is controlled by the onlyOwner...

Missing Ownership Check in mint Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description: The mint function in the PrincipalToken contract lacks a crucial ownership check before allowing token minting. While it correctly checks if the caller is the delegateToken contract to restrict minting to authorized contracts, it doesn't verify if...

Time Manipulation attack on reliance on block.timestamp for time-sensitive operations.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The block.timestamp allows a miner to call the mint function before the intended starting time mintingAllowedAfter which could lead to time manipulation. Contract name: ArcadeToken.sol Code link: Code line: function mintaddress to, uint256 amount externa...

Anyone can mint to themselves type(uint96).max if _isVaultCollateralized() returns true

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is no check that ensures the caller to mint is a trusted one. Moreover, there is a flaw which lets anyone to mint typeuint96.max number of shares Proof of Concept First, the mint function does not implement any check for the caller to be someone wi...

the mint function in erc4626 will mint incorrect amount

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact if you look at the ERC4626 contract the function mint minting the wrong amount at line 53 it should be minting the assets amount not the amount of the share and because the shares and assets are not 1:1 it will lead to unwanted results and different mint...