Upgraded Q -> 2 from #198 [1688918565387]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 198 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: QA1. UlyssesPool.maxRedeem needs to consider the protocol fees. --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

In Notional case Redeemer's redeem() will not do the position redeeming

Lines of code Vulnerability details Currently no actual redeeeming is done in Notional case as maxRedeem is a balance view function that doesn't close the position. This way one more operation, the redeeming itself, is now committed and in Notional case Redeemer's redeem doesn't perform anything,...

Unable to redeem from Notional

Lines of code Redeemer.solL193 Vulnerability details Impact The maxRedeem function is a view function which only returns the balance of the Redeemer.sol contract. After this value is obtained, the PT is not redeemed from Notional. The user will be unable to redeem PT from Notional through...

TurboSafe - should override maxWithdraw and maxRedeem

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Considering the EIP , as withdraw must revert if it is not possible to withdraw assets , it is important to have an accurate maxWithdraw function. However, here, maxWithdraw does not account for the current max withdrawal in the cToken contract. Liquidit...