7 matches found
CVE-2024-26732
A vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel related to the handling of the SOPEEKOFF socket option, which controls peeking into socket buffers. This option is not thread-safe and may lead to possible race conditions, which could cause system hangs...
CVE-2024-26732
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: implement lockless setsockoptSOPEEKOFF syzbot reported a lockdep violation 1 involving afunix support of SOPEEKOFF. Since SOPEEKOFF is inherently not thread safe it uses a per-socket skpeekoff field, there is really no point...
UBUNTU-CVE-2024-26732
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: implement lockless setsockoptSOPEEKOFF syzbot reported a lockdep violation 1 involving afunix support of SOPEEKOFF. Since SOPEEKOFF is inherently not thread safe it uses a per-socket skpeekoff field, there is really no point...
CVE-2024-26732
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: implement lockless setsockoptSOPEEKOFF syzbot reported a lockdep violation 1 involving afunix support of SOPEEKOFF. Since SOPEEKOFF is inherently not thread safe it uses a per-socket skpeekoff field, there is really no point...
CVE-2024-26732 net: implement lockless setsockopt(SO_PEEK_OFF)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: implement lockless setsockoptSOPEEKOFF syzbot reported a lockdep violation 1 involving afunix support of SOPEEKOFF. Since SOPEEKOFF is inherently not thread safe it uses a per-socket skpeekoff field, there is really no point...
CVE-2024-26732 net: implement lockless setsockopt(SO_PEEK_OFF)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: implement lockless setsockoptSOPEEKOFF syzbot reported a lockdep violation 1 involving afunix support of SOPEEKOFF. Since SOPEEKOFF is inherently not thread safe it uses a per-socket skpeekoff field, there is really no point...
CVE-2024-26732
CVE-2024-26732 affects the Linux kernel where SO_PEEK_OFF for sockets could cause a lockdep violation in af_unix, due to per-socket uio lock usage. The vulnerability arises because SO_PEEK_OFF was previously protected by kernel locks; a patch implemented lockless behavior for setsockopt(SO_PEEK_O...