CVE-2023-27889

Cross-site request forgery CSRF vulnerability in LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON versions prior to 1.2 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a user and to perform unintended operations by having a user view a malicious page...

Cross site request forgery (csrf)

Cross-site request forgery CSRF vulnerability in LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON versions prior to 1.2 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a user and to perform unintended operations by having a user view a malicious page...

CVE-2023-27889

CVE-2023-27889 — LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON plugin : A CSRF vulnerability affecting WordPress plugin versions prior to 1.2. The issue allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack a user’s session and perform unintended operations by forcing the user to view a malicious page. A fix exists in vers...

CVE-2023-27889

Cross-site request forgery CSRF vulnerability in LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON versions prior to 1.2 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a user and to perform unintended operations by having a user view a malicious page...

PT-2023-21395 · Unknown · Liquid Speech Balloon

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON versions prior to 1.2 Description: A cross-site request forgery CSRF issue allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a user and perform unintended operations by having a user view a malicio...

CVE-2023-27889

Cross-site request forgery CSRF vulnerability in LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON versions prior to 1.2 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a user and to perform unintended operations by having a user view a malicious page...

Assuming a 1-1 peg of Liquid Staked Tokens like stETH and rETH to ETH is dangerous

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The price of ETH staking derivatives may not be pegged 1-1 to ETH which affect staking conditions. Proof of Concept To stake eth, a user calls depositBeaconChainETH. The amount parameter is passed into the addShares function. In addShares, the amount...

WordPress LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON Plugin < 1.2 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Software LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON Type Plugin Vulnerable versions 1.2 Fixed in 1.2 OWASP Top 10 A5: Broken Access Control Classification Cross Site Request Forgery CSRF CVE CVE-2023-27889 Patch priority Low CVSS severity Low 4.3 Developer Claim ownership PSID b1811e420432 Credits Ryo Sato of BroadBa...

WordPress plugin "LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON" vulnerable to cross-site request forgery

Overview WordPress plugin "LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON" provided by LIQUID DESIGN Ltd. contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability CWE-352. Ryo Sato of BroadBand Security, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning...

WordPress plugin LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON 跨站请求伪造漏洞

WordPress and WordPress plugin are both products of the WordPress Foundation.WordPress is a blogging platform developed using the PHP language. The platform supports setting up personal blog sites on servers with PHP and MySQL.WordPress plugin is an application plugin. A security vulnerability...

JVN#99657911: WordPress plugin "LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON” vulnerable to cross-site request forgery

WordPress plugin "LIQUID SPEECH BALLOON” provided by LIQUID DESIGN Ltd. contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability CWE-352. Impact If a user views a malicious page while logged in, unintended operations may be performed. Solution Update the Software Update the Software to the latest...

[H-01] RETH oracle manipulation allows attacker to steal funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Asymmetry SafEth protocol aims to help diversify and decentralize liquid staking derivatives, exchanging ether staked in the protocol for staked ether derivative tokens based on some relative weighting. A function exposed by these derivative wrapper...

WordPress GiveWP Plugin <= 2.25.1 is vulnerable to Arbitrary Content Deletion

Software GiveWP Type Plugin Vulnerable versions = 2.25.1 Fixed in 2.25.2 OWASP Top 10 A5: Broken Access Control Classification Arbitrary Content Deletion CVE CVE-2023-23672 Patch priority Low CVSS severity Low 5.4 Developer Liquid Web / StellarWP PSID baa27979c9e7 Credits Rafshanzani Suhada...

WordPress GiveWP Plugin <= 2.25.1 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Software GiveWP Type Plugin Vulnerable versions = 2.25.1 Fixed in 2.25.2 OWASP Top 10 A5: Broken Access Control Classification Server Side Request Forgery SSRF CVE CVE-2022-40312 Patch priority Low CVSS severity Low 5.5 Developer Liquid Web / StellarWP PSID bdfc49563a46 Credits Rafie Muhammad...

WordPress GiveWP Plugin <= 2.25.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS)

Software GiveWP Type Plugin Vulnerable versions = 2.25.1 Fixed in 2.25.2 OWASP Top 10 A7: Cross-Site Scripting XSS Classification Cross Site Scripting XSS CVE CVE-2023-23668 Patch priority Low CVSS severity Low 6.5 Developer Liquid Web / StellarWP PSID 17d2bd271dd1 Credits Rafshanzani Suhada...

amountAvailableForStaking() not fully utilized with compoundedAvaxNodeOpAmt easily forfeited

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The mitigated step is implemented at the expense of economic loss to both the node operators and the liquid stakers if compoundedAvaxNodeOpAmt ggAVAX.amountAvailableForStaking after all due to situations like liquid stakers have been actively calling...

GGP slashing mechanism is incomplete.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The protocol docs mentions that "If the validator is failing at their duties, their GGP will be slashed and used to compensate the loss to our Liquid Stakers." But the actual implementation of the Staking.slashGGP function is very different from the abov...

Generalized frontrunning risk for claiming winnings due to request.currentChosenTokenId being public

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The function VRFNFTRandomDraw.sol:fulfillRandomWords called by Chainlink receives an array of random words, and uses it to choose a random offset by which the winning tokenId is selected. The chosen tokenId is stored on the public request variable in the...

Upgraded Q -> M from #205 [1669936745167]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 205 as M risk. The relevant finding follows: L01 - No check if EOARepresentative or EOARepresentativeOfNodeRunner is an EOA or a smart contract Impact A smart contract can end up being assigned as a smartWalletRepresentative. Such smart contract might not have...

Upgraded Q -> M from #121 [1669815281189]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 121 as M risk. The relevant finding follows: Require - always false contracts/liquid-staking/LiquidStakingManager.sol:280 isNodeRunnerWhitelistednodeRunner comparing to itself requireisNodeRunnerWhitelistednodeRunner != isNodeRunnerWhitelistednodeRunner,...