4107 matches found
Max label limit can be passed by adding labels via ajax
For CONF-8978, limits were implemented on how many labels can be added in one submit by various "add label" screens, and how many labels can be set on an edit page/edit news screen. However, there is nothing to prevent extra labels being added by the "add label" screens beyond the number allowed ...
Special proxy software to bypass port easily break limit-vulnerability warning-the black bar safety net
It is well known, the network connection is divided into a Sock, HTTP, FTP, and other types, respectively suitable for different applications. However, sometimes the network is only open 8 0 port for HTTP web browsing. Faced with this situation, we must do nothing? Of course not, in SockOnline th...
GLSA-200704-22 : BEAST: Denial of Service
The remote host is affected by the vulnerability described in GLSA-200704-22 BEAST: Denial of Service BEAST, which is installed as setuid root, fails to properly check whether it can drop privileges accordingly if seteuid fails due to a user exceeding assigned resource limits. Impact : A local us...
[SECURITY] [DSA 1218-1] New proftpd packages fix denial of service
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory DSA 1218-1 [email protected] http://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff November 21st, 2006 http://www.debian.org/security/faq -...
GLSA-200608-25 : X.org and some X.org libraries: Local privilege escalations
The remote host is affected by the vulnerability described in GLSA-200608-25 X.org and some X.org libraries: Local privilege escalations Several X.org libraries and X.org itself contain system calls to setuid functions, without checking their result. Impact : Local users could deliberately exceed...
X.org and some X.org libraries: Local privilege escalations
Background X.org is an implementation of the X Window System. Description Several X.org libraries and X.org itself contain system calls to setuid functions, without checking their result. Impact Local users could deliberately exceed their assigned resource limits and elevate their privileges afte...
MIT Kerberos / Heimdal privilege escalation
setuid/seteuid return code is not checked, allowing user to bypass protection by exhausting user limits...
Perl hackers need to know the 1 0 thing-vulnerability warning-the black bar safety net
Perl is the expert level of the system administrator's preferred scripting language, but its role is far more than that. As a design for file and text processing language, in addition to a variety of other uses, it is also extremely suitable for UNIX system Management, Web programming, and databa...
Jobs start from root when pam_limits enabled
docommand.c in Vixie cron vixie-cron 4.1 does not check the return code of a setuid call, which might allow local users to gain root privileges if setuid fails in cases such as PAM failures or resource limits, as originally demonstrated by a program that exceeds the process limits as defined in...
CVE-2006-3378
passwd command in shadow in Ubuntu 5.04 through 6.06 LTS, when called with the -f, -g, or -s flag, does not check the return code of a setuid call, which might allow local users to gain root privileges if setuid fails in cases such as PAM failures or resource limits...
DEBIAN-CVE-2006-3378
passwd command in shadow in Ubuntu 5.04 through 6.06 LTS, when called with the -f, -g, or -s flag, does not check the return code of a setuid call, which might allow local users to gain root privileges if setuid fails in cases such as PAM failures or resource limits...
USN-308-1: shadow vulnerability
Ilja van Sprundel discovered that passwd, when called with the -f, -g, or -s option, did not check the result of the setuid call. On systems that configure PAM limits for the maximum number of user processes, a local attacker could exploit this to execute chfn, gpasswd, or chsh with root...
Suid utilities (vixie-cron, shadow, ppp) user limits privilege escalation
setuid return code is not checked. It makes it possible to execute code with root privileges by exhausting user limits...
[Full-disclosure] [USN-310-1] ppp vulnerability
=========================================================== Ubuntu Security Notice USN-310-1 July 05, 2006 ppp vulnerability CVE-2006-2194 =========================================================== A security issue affects the following Ubuntu releases: Ubuntu 5.10 Ubuntu 6.06 LTS This advisory...
[Full-disclosure] [USN-308-1] shadow vulnerability
=========================================================== Ubuntu Security Notice USN-308-1 July 05, 2006 shadow vulnerability =========================================================== A security issue affects the following Ubuntu releases: Ubuntu 5.04 Ubuntu 5.10 Ubuntu 6.06 LTS This advisory...
CVE-2006-2194
The winbind plugin in pppd for ppp 2.4.4 and earlier does not check the return code from the setuid function call, which might allow local users to gain privileges by causing setuid to fail, such as exceeding PAM limits for the maximum number of user processes, which prevents the winbind NTLM...
DEBIAN-CVE-2006-2194
The winbind plugin in pppd for ppp 2.4.4 and earlier does not check the return code from the setuid function call, which might allow local users to gain privileges by causing setuid to fail, such as exceeding PAM limits for the maximum number of user processes, which prevents the winbind NTLM...
CVE-2006-2194
The winbind plugin in pppd for ppp 2.4.4 and earlier does not check the return code from the setuid function call, which might allow local users to gain privileges by causing setuid to fail, such as exceeding PAM limits for the maximum number of user processes, which prevents the winbind NTLM...
CVE-2006-2194
The winbind plugin in pppd for ppp 2.4.4 and earlier does not check the return code from the setuid function call, which might allow local users to gain privileges by causing setuid to fail, such as exceeding PAM limits for the maximum number of user processes, which prevents the winbind NTLM...
CVE-2006-2194
The winbind plugin in pppd for ppp 2.4.4 and earlier does not check the return code from the setuid function call, which might allow local users to gain privileges by causing setuid to fail, such as exceeding PAM limits for the maximum number of user processes, which prevents the winbind NTLM...