CVE-2022-49911

In CVE-2022-49911, the Linux kernel's netfilter ipset hash:net,iface type could exhaust memory because it did not enforce the documented limit of storing more than 64 networks with distinct interfaces in a single set. The issue is addressed by applying the documented restriction (max 64 interface...

CVE-2022-49911 netfilter: ipset: enforce documented limit to prevent allocating huge memory

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ipset: enforce documented limit to prevent allocating huge memory Daniel Xu reported that the hash:net,iface type of the ipset subsystem does not limit adding the same network with different interfaces to a set, which...

CVE-2022-49911

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ipset: enforce documented limit to prevent allocating huge memory Daniel Xu reported that the hash:net,iface type of the ipset subsystem does not limit adding the same network with different interfaces to a set, which...

CVE-2022-49911 netfilter: ipset: enforce documented limit to prevent allocating huge memory

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ipset: enforce documented limit to prevent allocating huge memory Daniel Xu reported that the hash:net,iface type of the ipset subsystem does not limit adding the same network with different interfaces to a set, which...

DEBIAN-CVE-2025-37752

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netsched: schsfq: move the limit validation It is not sufficient to directly validate the limit on the data that the user passes as it can be updated based on how the other parameters are changed. Move the check at the end of the...

CVE-2025-37752

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netsched: schsfq: move the limit validation It is not sufficient to directly validate the limit on the data that the user passes as it can be updated based on how the other parameters are changed. Move the check at the end of the...

UBUNTU-CVE-2025-37752

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netsched: schsfq: move the limit validation It is not sufficient to directly validate the limit on the data that the user passes as it can be updated based on how the other parameters are changed. Move the check at the end of the...

CVE-2025-37752 net_sched: sch_sfq: move the limit validation

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netsched: schsfq: move the limit validation It is not sufficient to directly validate the limit on the data that the user passes as it can be updated based on how the other parameters are changed. Move the check at the end of the...

CVE-2025-37752

CVE-2025-37752 is a Linux kernel vulnerability affecting the scheduler, specifically net_sched: sch_sfq. The root cause is that limit validation could be bypassed if the limit was indirectly updated as other parameters changed. The fix moves the limit validation to the end of the configuration up...

CVE-2025-37752

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netsched: schsfq: move the limit validation It is not sufficient to directly validate the limit on the data that the user passes as it can be updated based on how the other parameters are changed. Move the check at the end of the...

CVE-2025-37752 net_sched: sch_sfq: move the limit validation

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netsched: schsfq: move the limit validation It is not sufficient to directly validate the limit on the data that the user passes as it can be updated based on how the other parameters are changed. Move the check at the end of the...

CVE-2025-32376

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to versions 3.4.3 on the stable branch and 3.5.0.beta3 on the beta branch, the users limit for a DM can be bypassed, thus giving the ability to potentially create a DM with every user from a site in it. This issue has been patched in stable...

CVE-2025-32376

CVE-2025-32376 affects Discourse, where the DM limit enforcement could be bypassed. Affected versions are Discourse stable < 3.4.3 and beta

CVE-2025-32376 Discourse DM limits aren’t always properly enforced

Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to versions 3.4.3 on the stable branch and 3.5.0.beta3 on the beta branch, the users limit for a DM can be bypassed, thus giving the ability to potentially create a DM with every user from a site in it. This issue has been patched in stable...

WhatsApp Case Against NSO Group Progressing

Meta is suing NSO Group, basically claiming that the latter hacks WhatsApp and not just WhatsApp users. We have a procedural ruling: Under the order, NSO Group is prohibited from presenting evidence about its customers' identities, implying the targeted WhatsApp users are suspected or actual...

PT-2025-18290 · Discourse · Discourse

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Discourse versions prior to 3.4.3 Discourse versions prior to 3.5.0.beta3 Description: Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. In versions prior to 3.4.3 on the stable branch and 3.5.0.beta3 on the beta branch, the user limit for a...

Important: redis6

Issue Overview: Redis is an open source, in-memory database that persists on disk. In versions starting at 2.6 and prior to 7.4.3, An unauthenticated client can cause unlimited growth of output buffers, until the server runs out of memory or is killed. By default, the Redis configuration does not...

Medium: docker

Issue Overview: Reader.Read does not set a limit on the maximum size of file headers. A maliciously crafted archive could cause Read to allocate unbounded amounts of memory, potentially causing resource exhaustion or panics. After fix, Reader.Read limits the maximum size of header blocks to 1 MiB...

Medium: containerd

Issue Overview: Reader.Read does not set a limit on the maximum size of file headers. A maliciously crafted archive could cause Read to allocate unbounded amounts of memory, potentially causing resource exhaustion or panics. After fix, Reader.Read limits the maximum size of header blocks to 1 MiB...

Medium: runc

Issue Overview: Reader.Read does not set a limit on the maximum size of file headers. A maliciously crafted archive could cause Read to allocate unbounded amounts of memory, potentially causing resource exhaustion or panics. After fix, Reader.Read limits the maximum size of header blocks to 1 MiB...