410 matches found
@offchainlabs/l1-l3-teleport-contracts (>=0.1.0-alpha.1, <=1.0.1) potentially affected by CVE-2023-49798 via @openzeppelin/contracts (4.9.4)
@openzeppelin/contracts NPM version 4.9.4 is affected by a known vulnerability. The following packages have a transitive dependency on @openzeppelin/contracts and may be impacted: - @offchainlabs/l1-l3-teleport-contracts =0.1.0-alpha.1, =1.0.1 Source cves: CVE-2023-49798 Source advisory:...
Security Bulletin: IBM has released Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) fixes in response to Spectre variants 4 and 3a (CVE-2018-3639 CVE-2018-3640)
Summary IBM has released the following Unified Extensible Firmware Interface UEFI fixes for System x, Flex and BladeCenter systems in response to the vulnerabilities referred to as Spectre variants 4 and 3a. Vulnerability Details CVEID: CVE-2018-3639 DESCRIPTION: Multiple Intel CPU''s could allow...
CVE-2023-26941
Weak encryption mechanisms in RFID Tags in Yale Conexis L1 v1.1.0 allows attackers to create a cloned tag via physical proximity to the original...
CVE-2023-26941
Weak encryption mechanisms in RFID Tags in Yale Conexis L1 v1.1.0 allows attackers to create a cloned tag via physical proximity to the original...
CVE-2023-26941
Weak encryption mechanisms in RFID Tags in Yale Conexis L1 v1.1.0 allows attackers to create a cloned tag via physical proximity to the original...
CVE-2023-26941
Weak encryption mechanisms in RFID Tags in Yale Conexis L1 v1.1.0 allows attackers to create a cloned tag via physical proximity to the original...
Yale Conexis L1 Security Vulnerability
The Yale Conexis L1 is a smart door lock from Yale. A security vulnerability exists in the Yale Conexis L1 v1.0.0, which stems from a weak encryption mechanism in the RFID tag that allows an attacker to create a clone of the original tag by physically approaching it...
PT-2023-20862 · Yale · Yale Conexis L1
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Yale Conexis L1 version 1.1.0 Description: The issue is related to weak encryption mechanisms in RFID Tags, allowing attackers to create a cloned tag via physical proximity to the original. Recommendations: For Yale Conexis L1 version 1.1.0,...
Medium: qemu
Issue Overview: A bug in QEMU could cause a guest I/O operation otherwise addressed to an arbitrary disk offset to be targeted to offset 0 instead potentially overwriting the VM's boot code. This could be used, for example, by L2 guests with a virtual disk vdiskL2 stored on a virtual disk of an L...
Rocky Linux 8 : kernel (RLSA-2021:3548)
The remote Rocky Linux 8 host has packages installed that are affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the RLSA-2021:3548 advisory. - A flaw was found in the KVM's AMD code for supporting SVM nested virtualization. The flaw occurs when processing the VMCB virtual machine control block provide...
CVE-2023-5088
A bug in QEMU could cause a guest I/O operation otherwise addressed to an arbitrary disk offset to be targeted to offset 0 instead potentially overwriting the VM's boot code. This could be used, for example, by L2 guests with a virtual disk vdiskL2 stored on a virtual disk of an L1 vdiskL1...
CVE-2023-5088
A bug in QEMU could cause a guest I/O operation otherwise addressed to an arbitrary disk offset to be targeted to offset 0 instead potentially overwriting the VM's boot code. This could be used, for example, by L2 guests with a virtual disk vdiskL2 stored on a virtual disk of an L1 vdiskL1...
CVE-2023-5088 Qemu: improper ide controller reset can lead to mbr overwrite
A bug in QEMU could cause a guest I/O operation otherwise addressed to an arbitrary disk offset to be targeted to offset 0 instead potentially overwriting the VM's boot code. This could be used, for example, by L2 guests with a virtual disk vdiskL2 stored on a virtual disk of an L1 vdiskL1...
CVE-2023-5088
A bug in QEMU could cause a guest I/O operation otherwise addressed to an arbitrary disk offset to be targeted to offset 0 instead potentially overwriting the VM's boot code. This could be used, for example, by L2 guests with a virtual disk vdiskL2 stored on a virtual disk of an L1 vdiskL1...
Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update
4.14.35-2047.529.3 - uek-rpm: Update kernel linux-firmware dependency to 20230516-999.26.git6c9e0ed5. Somasundaram Krishnasamy Orabug: 35724203 - LTS version: v4.14.322 Saeed Mirzamohammadi - drm/edid: fix objtool warning in drmcvtmodes Linus Torvalds - mtd: rawnand: omapelm: Fix incorrect type i...
In BondingVotes.sol, clock() will not work properly for Arbitrum due to use of block.number
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In BondingVotes.sol, clock is set to match the current round and clock has been extensively used in onlyPastRounds, getVotes, delegates, checkpointBondingState, checkpointTotalActiveStake, getTotalActiveStakeAt, getBondingCheckpointAt and it is given as...
L1SCMgmtActivationAction does not check executor role of new and prev emergency security council
Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept GovernanceChainSCMgmtActivationAction.sol checks that the newEmergencySecurityCouncil has a upgradeExecutor role whereas the prevEmergencySecurityCouncil does not have a upgradeExecutor role. GovernanceChainSCMgmtActivationAction.sol // confirm...
Timelock canceller role is removed from council and transferred to upgrade executor
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In L1SCMgmtActivationAction the TIMELOCKCANCELLORROLE is removed from the previous EmergencySecurityCouncil and not transferred to the new EmergencySecurityCouncil but rather to the L1 UpgradeExecutor. In SecurityCouncilNomineeElectionGovernor the...
Attacker can steal CrossDomainMessenger and OptimismPortal token balances or tokens of anyone give approval for those contracts
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Contracts CrossDomainMessenger and OptimismPortal are part of the bridge protocol and they are responsible for sending messages between two network. they both call arbitrary address with arbitrary data that user specified and it would give attacker to...
CrossDomainMessenger relayMessage Vulnerability
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The vulnerability allows an attacker to manipulate the sender address sender parameter when relaying a message from Layer 2 L2 to Layer 1 L1 in a cross-domain scenario. The issue arises due to the use of the L2CrossDomainMessenger contract address...