EUVD-2023-59135

Malicious code in bioql PyPI...

CBL Mariner 2.0 Security Update: mariadb (CVE-2023-6937)

The version of mariadb installed on the remote CBL Mariner 2.0 host is prior to tested version. It is, therefore, affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the CVE-2023-6937 advisory. - wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one DTLS record do not span key boundaries. As a resul...

DEBIAN-CVE-2023-6937

wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one DTLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine DTLS messages using different keys into one DTLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in DTLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted DTLS 1.3 record...

CVE-2023-6937

wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one DTLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine DTLS messages using different keys into one DTLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in DTLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted DTLS 1.3 record...

Authentication flaw

wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one DTLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine DTLS messages using different keys into one DTLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in DTLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted DTLS 1.3 record...

CVE-2023-6937

wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one DTLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine DTLS messages using different keys into one DTLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in DTLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted DTLS 1.3 record...

CVE-2023-6937

wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one DTLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine DTLS messages using different keys into one DTLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in DTLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted DTLS 1.3 record...

CVE-2023-6937: Improper Input Validation

wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one DTLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine DTLS messages using different keys into one DTLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in DTLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted DTLS 1.3 record...