CVE-2026-94639 Apache Thrift: Java `TSaslNonblockingServer`: residual of CVE-2026-61373 (thread-death black hole + no cross-connection budget)

improper handling of exceptional conditions, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling, Uncaught exception vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue...

EUVD-2026-91339

improper handling of exceptional conditions, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling, Uncaught exception vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue...

CVE-2026-94639 Apache Thrift: Java `TSaslNonblockingServer`: residual of CVE-2026-61373 (thread-death black hole + no cross-connection budget)

improper handling of exceptional conditions, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling, Uncaught exception vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue...

DEBIAN-CVE-2026-17508

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, several password-based key derivation entry points ran the KDF with cost parameters taken from the untrusted input being processed, without bounding them, so a small input could dictate an arbitrary amount of work before any password or integrity check could...

DEBIAN-CVE-2026-17507

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the MLS implementation org.bouncycastle.mls holds RFC 9420's uint32 leafindex in a signed int, so a wire value with the top bit set decodes to a negative number. That is a legitimate encoding rather than malformed input, and it must still decode, since the M...

DEBIAN-CVE-2026-18036

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a...

CVE-2026-17508

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, several password-based key derivation entry points ran the KDF with cost parameters taken from the untrusted input being processed, without bounding them, so a small input could dictate an arbitrary amount of work before any password or integrity check could...

CVE-2026-17507

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the MLS implementation org.bouncycastle.mls holds RFC 9420's uint32 leafindex in a signed int, so a wire value with the top bit set decodes to a negative number. That is a legitimate encoding rather than malformed input, and it must still decode, since the M...

CVE-2026-18036

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a...

UBUNTU-CVE-2026-18036

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a...

UBUNTU-CVE-2026-17507

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the MLS implementation org.bouncycastle.mls holds RFC 9420's uint32 leafindex in a signed int, so a wire value with the top bit set decodes to a negative number. That is a legitimate encoding rather than malformed input, and it must still decode, since the M...

UBUNTU-CVE-2026-17508

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, several password-based key derivation entry points ran the KDF with cost parameters taken from the untrusted input being processed, without bounding them, so a small input could dictate an arbitrary amount of work before any password or integrity check could...

EUVD-2026-91317

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a...

CVE-2026-18036 NTRU leaks private key information by reducing secret values with a non-constant-time integer division

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a...

CVE-2026-18036

Bouncy Castle for Java versions prior to 1.86 are vulnerable to a timing side-channel attack in the NTRU implementation. The root cause is the use of the % operator in three helpers, leading to integer division where latency depends on the secret operand. Specifically, Polynomial.modQ divides by ...

CVE-2026-18036 NTRU leaks private key information by reducing secret values with a non-constant-time integer division

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a...

CVE-2026-18036 NTRU leaks private key information by reducing secret values with a non-constant-time integer division

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a...

CVE-2026-18036

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a...

CVE-2026-17508 Password-based KDF cost parameters honoured unbounded from untrusted input across the remaining PBE entry points

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, several password-based key derivation entry points ran the KDF with cost parameters taken from the untrusted input being processed, without bounding them, so a small input could dictate an arbitrary amount of work before any password or integrity check could...

CVE-2026-17508 Password-based KDF cost parameters honoured unbounded from untrusted input across the remaining PBE entry points

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, several password-based key derivation entry points ran the KDF with cost parameters taken from the untrusted input being processed, without bounding them, so a small input could dictate an arbitrary amount of work before any password or integrity check could...