8 matches found
increaseUnlockTime missing _checkpoint for delegated values
Lines of code Vulnerability details PNM-001 increaseUnlockTime missing checkpoint for delegated values. Links Description In the VotingEscrow contract, users can increase their voting power by: Adding more funds to their delegated valule Increasing the time of their lock Being delegated by anothe...
Expired locks can still increaseUnlockTime when the locked_.end != msg.sender
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Expired locks can still increase their unlock time and the new unlocktime does not factor in the duration the lock was inactive Proof of Concept Users can increase their unlock time via the increaseUnlockTime function. In the increaseUnlockTime function ...
ERROR IN UPDATING **_checkpoint** IN THE **increaseUnlockTime** FUNCTION
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The potentiel impact of this error are : Give wrong voting power to a user at a given block. Give wrong total voting power at a given block. Give wrong total voting power. Proof of Concept The error occured in this line : In the increaseUnlockTime functi...
checkpointing of same state values in increaseUnlockTime()
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact oldLocked and locked referes to same LockedBalance in increaseUnlockTime while calling checkpoint Proof of Concept // See IVotingEscrow for documentation function increaseUnlockTimeuint256 unlockTime ........ LockedBalance memory locked = lockedmsg.sende...
VotingEscrow.increaseUnlockTime() uses wrong unlock time for old lock.
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact VotingEscrow.increaseUnlockTime uses wrong unlock time for old lock. The user's voting power might be calculated wrongly. Proof of Concept As we can see from CheckpointMath, the oldLock.end should be original value but it uses the increased unlocktime...
The _checkpoint function won't be called for a user which is both a delegator and a delegatee in the increaseUnlockTime function
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The virtual balance of a user is calculated using 2 values - the amount that is delegated to that user, and his lock period. When calling the increaseUnlockTime function, we want to checkpoint the user's data as long as he doesn't have any funds. This is...
Wrong values are passed to _checkpoint mess up accounting
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The increaseUnlockTime function sends a wrong unlock time to the checkpoint function in the oldLocked variable - the locked variable which is the new LockedBalance is copied into the oldLocked variable which is supposed to be the previous LockedBalance,...
A malicious delegatee can always block the delegator from undelegating the lock
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A user who has delegated his/hers voting power to a delegatee can break his/hers delegate only by submitting a lock with a higher expiration time than the delegatee after a successful call to increaseUnlockTime function. After that, he has to call the...