Multiple Proposer Transaction Fee Mechanism Design: Robust Incentives against Censorship and Bribery

Censorship resistance is one of the core value proposition of blockchains. A recurring design pattern aimed at providing censorship resistance is enabling multiple proposers to contribute inputs into block construction. Notably, Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists FOCIL is proposed to be include...

AI-Based Crypto Tokens: the Illusion of Decentralized AI?

The convergence of blockchain and artificial intelligence AI has led to the emergence of AI-based tokens, which are cryptographic assets designed to power decentralized AI platforms and services. This paper provides a comprehensive review of leading AI-token projects, examining their technical...

CVE-2025-2587

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Jinher OA C6 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file IncentivePlanFulfillAppprove.aspx. The manipulation of the argument httpOID leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been...

CVE-2021-35585

Vulnerability in the Oracle Incentive Compensation product of Oracle E-Business Suite component: User Interface. Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.1-12.1.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Incentive...

The vulnerability of the Compensation Plan component of Oracle Incentive Compensation system for corporate clients allows a violator to gain access to modify, add, and delete data. This component is part of the Oracle E-Business Suite, which automates business operations.

The vulnerability of the Compensation Plan component of Oracle’s corporate client incentive compensation system, Oracle Incentive Compensation OIC, and the Oracle E-Business Suite automation system, is related to deficiencies in the authorization process due to incorrect validation of input data...

CVE-2024-21269

Vulnerability in the Oracle Incentive Compensation product of Oracle E-Business Suite component: Compensation Plan. Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Incentive...

CVE-2024-21269

Vulnerability in the Oracle Incentive Compensation product of Oracle E-Business Suite component: Compensation Plan. Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Incentive...

CVE-2024-21269

Vulnerability in the Oracle Incentive Compensation product of Oracle E-Business Suite component: Compensation Plan. Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Incentive...

CVE-2024-21269

The CVE-2024-21269 issue affects Oracle E-Business Suite, specifically the Incentive Compensation component (Compensation Plan) in versions 12.2.3–12.2.13. The root cause, as described in public sources, enables a low-privilege, network-accessible attacker (HTTP) to compromise data, potentially a...

Oracle E-Business Suite 安全漏洞

Oracle E-Business Suite is a set of fully integrated global business management software from Oracle USA. The software provides customer relationship management, service management, financial management, and other functions. A security vulnerability exists in Oracle Incentive Compensation version...

Liquidator can get higher rate for liquidation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept When position is unhealthy then it can be liquidated. In order to incentivize someone to liquidate positions they receive some extra amount of collateral. This incentive percentage is calculated inside...

position can be opened without premium

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description Premium in ParticlePositionManager is used to cover trading fees accrued for the liquidity borrowed. When liquidating, a portion of the premium is also used for the liquidation reward. The issue is that a borrower can open a position without any...

Incorrect fee splitting logic

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The fee splitting logic does not properly attribute holder and creator rewards. By splitting fees from the total rather than incrementally, it distorts the proportional rewards earned over time. This could undermine the incentive structures and alignment...

Commentary on the Implementation Plan for the 2023 US National Cybersecurity Strategy

The Atlantic Council released a detailed commentary on the White Houses new "Implementation Plan for the 2023 US National Cybersecurity Strategy." Lots of interesting bits. So far, at least three trends emerge: First, the plan contains a somewhat more concrete list of actions than its parent...

User can manipulate totalRewardUnclaimed and steal pool incentives

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the UniswapV3Staker.sol contract, a user can drain the incentives by repeatedly staking and unstaking. Proof of Concept During staking, the stakeToken... function checks that incentives is not zero this would later become insufficient but does not in...

Lack of slippage in redeem can result in loss of shares for redeemer

Lines of code Vulnerability details FPS holders can redeem their shares against zchf using redeem File: Equity.sol 276: function redeemaddress target, uint256 shares public returns uint256 //@audit no slippage, calculateProceeds can return 0 277: requirecanRedeemmsg.sender; 278: uint256 proceeds ...

StRSR: attacker can steal excess rsr that is returned after seizure

Lines of code Vulnerability details Note: This issue deals with excess rsr that was seized from stRSR but is returned again. The M-12 issue also deals with excess rsr. However M-12 deals with the fact that not all rsr is returned to stRSR, whereas this issue deals with the fact that an attacker c...

Incentive fund loss when calling claim() in AutoPxGlp/PxGmxRewards because it calls this.compound(,,true) which would transfer incentive to contract itself and those funds won't be calculated as rewards or fee and won't be accessible to withdraw

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function claim in PxGmxReward contract is used for claiming available pxGMX rewards of a user. but this function calls IAutoPxGlpaddressthis.compound1, 1, true; to harvest new rewards and stake them to compound rewards. but this call is external call and...

No incentive mechanism for allowed senders to call finalizeWithdrawal on behalf of withdrawers.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since finalizeWithdrawal is a permissioned function, if there are no mechanism in place for allowed senders to trigger it, withdrawers would not able to receive their funds in a timely fashion. Proof of Concept The withdrawal functions such...

Calling borrowAsset function with 0 _collateralAmount can borrow asset tokens without providing any collateral tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The borrowAsset function can be called with the collateralAmount input being set to 0. This will successfully bypass the step for providing any collateral tokens while directly borrowing the asset tokens. When a borrower borrows assets without providing...