Crlf injection

Hotels Styx through 1.0.0.beta8 allows HTTP response splitting due to CRLF Injection. This is exploitable if untrusted user input can appear in a response header...

CVE-2020-6858

Hotels Styx through 1.0.0.beta8 allows HTTP response splitting due to CRLF Injection. This is exploitable if untrusted user input can appear in a response header...

CVE-2020-6858

CVE-2020-6858 affects Hotels Styx up to 1.0.0.beta8. The issue is HTTP Response Splitting (CRLF injection) caused by disabling Netty’s HTTP header validation in Styx code paths: HttpHeaders.Builder configured with new DefaultHttpHeaders(false) and StyxToNettyResponseTranslator creating DefaultHtt...

CVE-2020-6858

Hotels Styx through 1.0.0.beta8 allows HTTP response splitting due to CRLF Injection. This is exploitable if untrusted user input can appear in a response header...

CVE-2020-6858: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component

Hotels Styx through 1.0.0.beta8 allows HTTP response splitting due to CRLF Injection. This is exploitable if untrusted user input can appear in a response header...

HTTP Response Splitting

Styx is vulnerable HTTP Response Splitting. The vulnerability exists because the StyxToNettyResponseTranslator and Builder classes of StyxToNettyResponseTranslator.javaand HttpHeaders.java do not validate the HTTP Header built into Netty respectively, allowing an attacker to inject CRLF Sequences...

GHSA-33VF-4XGG-9R58 HTTP Response Splitting (Early Hints) in Puma

Impact If an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting...

HTTP Response Splitting (Early Hints) in Puma

Impact If an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting...

HTTP Response Splitting in Styx

Vulnerability Styx is vulnerable to CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers 'HTTP Response Splitting'. Vulnerable Component The vulnerable component is the com.hotels.styx.api.HttpHeaders.Builder due to disabling the HTTP Header validation built into Netty in these...

GHSA-6V7P-V754-J89V HTTP Response Splitting in Styx

Vulnerability Styx is vulnerable to CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers 'HTTP Response Splitting'. Vulnerable Component The vulnerable component is the com.hotels.styx.api.HttpHeaders.Builder due to disabling the HTTP Header validation built into Netty in these...

HTTP Response Splitting

puma is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. The attack exist because it does not properly handle the CRLF carriage feed or line return characters injection in early hints response header, allowing an attacker to inject CRLF to end the the HTTP response header and manipulate with malicious...

HTTP Response Splitting (Early Hints) in Puma

Impact If an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting...

PT-2020-19270

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Hotels Styx versions prior to 1.0.0.beta9 Description The issue allows HTTP response splitting due to CRLF Injection. This is exploitable if untrusted user input can appear in a response header. Recommendations For versions prior to 1.0.0.beta...

CVE-2020-5249

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is...

CVE-2020-5249

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is...

CVE-2020-5249

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is...

CVE-2020-5249

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is...

UBUNTU-CVE-2020-5249

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is...

Cross site scripting

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is...

CVE-2020-5249

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is...