SUSE SLES12 Security Update : gnutls (SUSE-SU-2018:2825-2)

This update for gnutls fixes the following issues : This update for gnutls fixes the following issues : Security issues fixed : Improved mitigations against Lucky 13 class of attacks 'Just in Time' PRIME + PROBE cache-based side channel attack can lead to plaintext recovery CVE-2018-10846,...

SUSE-SU-2018:2930-1 Security update for gnutls

This update for gnutls fixes the following security issues: - Improved mitigations against Lucky 13 class of attacks - CVE-2018-10846: 'Just in Time' PRIME + PROBE cache-based side channel attack can lead to plaintext recovery bsc1105460 - CVE-2018-10845: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen...

SUSE SLES12 Security Update : gnutls (SUSE-SU-2018:2825-1)

This update for gnutls fixes the following issues : This update for gnutls fixes the following issues : Security issues fixed : Improved mitigations against Lucky 13 class of attacks 'Just in Time' PRIME + PROBE cache-based side channel attack can lead to plaintext recovery CVE-2018-10846,...

Timing Attack

libgnutls.c is vulnerable to timing attacks. The uses the wrong constant during HMAC-SHA-384 hashing, allowing a malicious user to conduct gain access to sensitive information by analyzing the timing data by sending crafted packets. This is similar to the "Lucky Thirteen" attack...

Code injection

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-256 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

CVE-2018-10844

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-256 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

Code injection

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

CVE-2018-10845

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

CVE-2018-10845

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

DEBIAN-CVE-2018-10844

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-256 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

CVE-2018-10844

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-256 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

DEBIAN-CVE-2018-10845

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

CVE-2018-10844

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-256 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

CVE-2018-10845

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

CVE-2018-10845

CVE-2018-10845 affects GnuTLS HMAC-SHA-384 and enables a Lucky Thirteen–style timing side-channel leading to potential plaintext recovery. The connected IBM advisories confirm remote exploitation via crafted packets to obtain information, with MEDIUM base scores and impact on confidentiality. Rem...

CVE-2018-10844

CVE-2018-10844 affects GnuTLS HMAC-SHA-256 and is described in multiple sources (IBM advisories and third‑party feeds) as a Lucky Thirteen–style timing attack enabling distinguishing and plaintext‑recovery via crafted packets. Affected products include IBM Power Hardware Management Console and IB...

CVE-2018-10845

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

CVE-2018-10844

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-256 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

CVE-2018-10844

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-256 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...

CVE-2018-10845

It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets...