Lucene search
+L

46 matches found

RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2026/07/22 11:10 a.m.•16 views

CVE-2026-16318

A flaw was found in s2n-tls, a Transport Layer Security TLS implementation. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit a memory leak in the QUIC transport parameters extension handler. By repeatedly forcing HelloRetryRequests during a TLS 1.3 connection, an attacker can cause the server proce...

6.9CVSS5.6AI score0.00529EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/07/21 9:16 p.m.•14 views

CVE-2026-16318

The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...

6.9CVSS0.00529EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/07/21 8:14 p.m.•46 views

CVE-2026-16318

The CVE-2026-16318 issue affects server-side QUIC deployments using s2n-tls, where the QUIC transport parameters extension handler uses s2n_alloc instead of s2n_realloc. During TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest, the handler runs twice on the same connection; on the second run it zeroes the existing point...

6.9CVSS5.7AI score0.00529EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/07/21 8:14 p.m.•32 views

CVE-2026-16318 QUIC Transport Parameters Memory Leak During HelloRetryRequest in s2n-tls

The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...

6.9CVSS0.00529EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/07/21 8:14 p.m.•17 views

CVE-2026-16318 QUIC Transport Parameters Memory Leak During HelloRetryRequest in s2n-tls

The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...

6.9CVSS5.3AI score
SaveExploits0References5
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/07/21 8:14 p.m.•14 views

CVE-2026-16318 QUIC Transport Parameters Memory Leak During HelloRetryRequest in s2n-tls

The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...

6.9CVSS5.7AI score0.00529EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/07/21 8:14 p.m.•17 views

EUVD-2026-46402

The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...

6.9CVSS5.3AI score0.00529EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/07/21 12:00 a.m.•33 views

PT-2026-62072

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions s2n-tls versions prior to v1.7.6 Description The QUIC transport parameters extension handler incorrectly uses s2n alloc instead of s2n realloc to store peer transport parameters. In TLS 1.3 connections involving a HelloRetryRequest, the handle...

6.9CVSS5.8AI score0.00529EPSS
SaveExploits0References14
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/07/14 9:41 p.m.•16 views

JLSEC-2026-673

In wolfSSL before 5.5.1, malicious clients can cause a buffer overflow during a TLS 1.3 handshake. This occurs when an attacker supposedly resumes a previous TLS session. During the resumption Client Hello a Hello Retry Request must be triggered. Both Client Hellos are required to contain a list ...

7.5CVSS7.3AI score0.05763EPSS
SaveExploits2References5
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/07/14 9:41 p.m.•27 views

JLSEC-2026-704 Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in...

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00353EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2026/03/20 4:09 p.m.•17 views

CVE-2026-3230

A flaw was found in wolfSSL. A remote attacker could exploit a missing cryptographic step in the Transport Layer Security TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic. By sending a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension, an...

2.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00353EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Snyk
Snyk
•added 2026/03/19 10:45 p.m.•19 views

Missing Cryptographic Step

Overview Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Missing Cryptographic Step due to missing validation in the keyshare process during the TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest handshake. An attacker can compromise the confidentiality of encrypted communications by sending a crafted HelloRetryReque...

2.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00353EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/03/19 9:30 p.m.•31 views

EUVD-2026-13209

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.1CVSS5.8AI score0.00353EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/03/19 9:17 p.m.•18 views

CVE-2026-3230

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.7CVSS0.00353EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
•added 2026/03/19 9:17 p.m.•12 views

CVE-2026-3230

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.7CVSS5.9AI score0.00353EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/03/19 9:17 p.m.•29 views

UBUNTU-CVE-2026-3230

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00353EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/03/19 8:59 p.m.•8 views

CVE-2026-3230 Improper key_share validation in TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.1CVSS5.9AI score0.00353EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/03/19 8:59 p.m.•72 views

CVE-2026-3230

wolfSSL’s TLS 1.3 client logic is affected by an improper key_share handling during HelloRetryRequest, allowing a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello without the key_share extension to derive predictable traffic secrets from the (EC)DHE shared secret. Affected component: TLS hands...

2.7CVSS5.9AI score0.00353EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
Debian CVE
Debian CVE
•added 2026/03/19 8:59 p.m.•35 views

CVE-2026-3230

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.7CVSS5.9AI score0.00353EPSS
SaveExploits0
AlpineLinux
AlpineLinux
•added 2026/03/19 8:59 p.m.•23 views

CVE-2026-3230

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.7CVSS5.9AI score0.00353EPSS
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder