45 matches found
CVE-2026-16318
A flaw was found in s2n-tls, a Transport Layer Security TLS implementation. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit a memory leak in the QUIC transport parameters extension handler. By repeatedly forcing HelloRetryRequests during a TLS 1.3 connection, an attacker can cause the server proce...
CVE-2026-16318
The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...
CVE-2026-16318
The CVE-2026-16318 issue affects server-side QUIC deployments using s2n-tls, where the QUIC transport parameters extension handler uses s2n_alloc instead of s2n_realloc. During TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest, the handler runs twice on the same connection; on the second run it zeroes the existing point...
CVE-2026-16318 QUIC Transport Parameters Memory Leak During HelloRetryRequest in s2n-tls
The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...
CVE-2026-16318 QUIC Transport Parameters Memory Leak During HelloRetryRequest in s2n-tls
The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...
CVE-2026-16318 QUIC Transport Parameters Memory Leak During HelloRetryRequest in s2n-tls
The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...
EUVD-2026-46402
The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...
PT-2026-62072
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions s2n-tls versions prior to v1.7.6 Description The QUIC transport parameters extension handler incorrectly uses s2n alloc instead of s2n realloc to store peer transport parameters. In TLS 1.3 connections involving a HelloRetryRequest, the handle...
JLSEC-2026-673
In wolfSSL before 5.5.1, malicious clients can cause a buffer overflow during a TLS 1.3 handshake. This occurs when an attacker supposedly resumes a previous TLS session. During the resumption Client Hello a Hello Retry Request must be triggered. Both Client Hellos are required to contain a list ...
JLSEC-2026-704 Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in...
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...
CVE-2026-3230
A flaw was found in wolfSSL. A remote attacker could exploit a missing cryptographic step in the Transport Layer Security TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic. By sending a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension, an...
Missing Cryptographic Step
Overview Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Missing Cryptographic Step due to missing validation in the keyshare process during the TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest handshake. An attacker can compromise the confidentiality of encrypted communications by sending a crafted HelloRetryReque...
EUVD-2026-13209
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...
CVE-2026-3230
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...
CVE-2026-3230
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-3230
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...
CVE-2026-3230 Improper key_share validation in TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...
CVE-2026-3230
wolfSSL’s TLS 1.3 client logic is affected by an improper key_share handling during HelloRetryRequest, allowing a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello without the key_share extension to derive predictable traffic secrets from the (EC)DHE shared secret. Affected component: TLS hands...
CVE-2026-3230
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...
CVE-2026-3230
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...