FBI Alert: Crypto Scammers are Masquerading as NFT Developers

The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI is warning about cyber crooks masquerading as legitimate non-fungible token NFT developers to steal cryptocurrency and other digital assets from unsuspecting users. In these fraudulent schemes, criminals either obtain direct access to NFT developer...

Missing deadline param in swapExactAmountOut() allowing outdated slippage and allow pending transaction to be executed unexpectedly.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Loss of funds/tokens for the protocol, since block execution is delegated to the block validator without a hard deadline. Proof of Concept The function swapExactAmountOut from LiquidationRouter.sol and LiquidationPair.sol use these methods to swap tokens...

CONTROLLED LOW-LEVEL CALL

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The contract was using call which was accepting address controlled by a user. This can have devastating effects on the contract as a delegate call allows the contract to execute code belonging to other contracts but using it’s own storage. This can very...

Insufficient input validation can lead to loss of funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The VaultBooster.sol contract allows someone to liquidate tokens for a vault and improve the vault's chance of winning. The prizePool.prizeToken is set in the constructor and liquidationPair set in the setBoost function. However, the external deposit...

INCORRECT ACCESS CONTROL

Lines of code https...

Flashloan excess debt is not sent to user

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact These vulnerabilities can have the following impacts: 1. Liquidators may lose their eligible funds due to missing transfers of excess debt assets. 2. Excess debt TR tokens could remain in the contract after LP.flashloan claim back borrowed funds, which c...

Overstatement of Available Funds Due to Logic Error

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The computeAvailable function in VaultBooster.sol could potentially overstate the available balance in certain situations. Two functions rely on computeAvailable for determining the available funds, such as liquidate, accrue. If the overstated balance fr...

cleanup() does not properly handle debt repayment

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The cleanup... function in the PositionManager.sol contract is used to deposit remaining users assets back to ROE, repaying debt if any. However the users debt will not be repaid if the user has debt leading to loss of funds for the lenders and the proje...

Missing flash loan initiator check allows attacker to open trades, close trades and steal funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The attacker can close trades, partially close trades and even steal funds. Proof of Concept The OptionsPositionManager.executeOperation function is called when a flash loan is made and it can only be called by the lendingPool. The wrong assumption by th...

removeFromAllTicks() withdraws all tick assets before deposit and withdraw re-deposit them creates a reentrancy attacks.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact reentrancy attacks can result to stolen funds Proof of Concept The key issue is that removeFromAllTicks calls removeFromTickindex in a loop, which calls lendingPool.withdraw and tr.withdraw. These external calls could trigger a reentrant call back into t...

The project's reputation and user funds can be affected if a clear invariant is not met

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details Impact The protocol may not work as expected in years that are not 365 days long, which could lead to a loss of confidence in the protocol. In fact, the next year is one of those years leap year. Furthermore, defining it as a constant in t...

if _rescueFunds was called with the address of a mToken, the admin would currently be able to sweep those tokens,

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It allows the admin to steal deposited funds from users It removes mTokens used as collateral to back borrows Proof of Concept Assume there is a mToken at address 0x123 that has issued some tokens. The admin calls rescueFunds0x123, uint.max. This will...

Attacker can Steal all eths of WETHRouter.sol through redeem function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can Steal eths through redeem function in WETHRouter.sol as you know the contract does the redeem process and redeem user mTokens to ETHs, and as you know we have the function of mint which is the opposite of this and users deposit ETH in ord...

Users repay more than the approved amount.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact More tokens can be repaid than were approved leading to loss of funds Proof of Concept The repayBorrowFresh function does the following: 1. Checks if repay is allowed by calling comptroller.repayBorrowAllowed with the input repayAmount. 2. Fetches the...

User cannot withdraw their ERC1155 tokens.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the NFTBoostVault.sol contract, users can only withdraw their ERC1155 if utilized when they are withdrawing all their tokens at once. this can lead to loss of funds for the users who decide to withdraw their locked tokens in bits. Proof of Concept Whe...

loss of user funds in ARCDVestingVault.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the contract ARCDVestingVault.sol the function delegate is used to delegate user votes to desired address but it fails to maintain the sanity check if the provided address is a zeroaddress or not function delegateaddress to external...

A user could call mint() with less ETH than the mintPrice and improperly mint badges for a cheaper cost.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact users underpaying to mint badges will lead to loss of funds Proof of Concept It checks if msg.value is less than the required mintPrice, but it does not check for the case where msg.value mintPrice. This means: A user could send only 1 wei when the...

Incorrect accounting in GSC approval mechanism in ArcadeTreasury

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Once the GSC has approved a spender for a certain amount of tokens, any further attempt to modify this approval will result in inaccessible treasury funds. Proof of Concept Currently every call to gscApprove results in the gscAllowance decreasing which...

Manager can delete any users voting power

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A manager can maliciously/accidentally remove all voting power for all users due to missing input validation when setting the multiplier value. By setting a value smaller than 1e3 it will result in all multiplier calculations rounding to 0, causing loss ...

A reorg on the origin chain after a proposal has been validated will result in loss of funds for the protocol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The protocol will lose the funds that the user sent to the origin chain InterchainProposalSender contract for the proposal. Proof of Concept When a proposal gets submitted it gets reviewed by validators on the Axelar network and then receives a validatio...