590 matches found
borrowInternal() of BaseTOFTMarketModule.sol has phantom permit functions
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A malicious actor could steal funds from a User who has already done his first deposit. Proof of Concept Consider the case where attacker uses a token with phantom permit function as collateral, the most famous ones being WETH, BNB, HEX etc. Let’s consid...
User can bypass their approved redeem allowance
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The caller can bypass the allowance check by exploiting the exchange rate calculation and drain funds from the contract up to the full balance owned by msg.sender, not just the amount approved in the allowance. Proof of Concept The issue is that...
Identifying publications using its ID makes the protocol vulnerable to blockchain re-orgs
Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description In the protocol, publications are uniquely identified through the publisher's profile ID and the publication's ID. For example, when a user calls act, the publication being acted on is determined by publicationActedProfileId and...
The owner can call _upgrade directly, skipping executeLensV2Upgrade.
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Loss of funds due to skipped checks before transfers Invalid system state due to assuming conditions not verified Hiding failed upgrade due to skipped revert/events Proof of Concept upgrade is missing an onlyOwner modifier By calling upgrade directly, th...
Front running issue when updating the GSC allowance
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This would lead to loss of funds as the attacker drained tokens based on old allowance. Proof of Concept The issue is between these two lines: 1. The new allowance amount is set in storage via gscAllowancetoken = newAllowance 2. The GSCAllowanceUpdated...
IF FEE ON TRANSFER TOKEN CONFIGURED AS THE VOTING TOKEN FOR THE VAULT, IT COULD INTRODUCE ACCOUNTING ERROR FOR VOTE COUNT
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The NFTBoostVault.lockTokens function is used to transfer the ERC20 voting token of the vault and the ERC1155 NFT to the NFTBoostVault contract after accounting for their respective votes. The issue here is that a fee-on-transfer token could get selected...
culinaryhealthfund.org Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3551835
Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...
amsterdamsfondsvoordekunst.nl Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3547143
Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...
InterchainTokenService.expressReceiveTokenWithData does not apply Check-Effect-Interaction mode
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact InterchainTokenService.expressReceiveTokenWithData does not apply the Check-Effect-Interaction pattern. In some edge cases, the caller can lose funds. Proof of Concept The life cycle of sending token across chains contains 3 phases: //P1: launch on sourc...
Attacker can create additional canonical token bridge
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Deployers of custom TokenManagers can subvert the limitation imposed in the documentation that allows only one Canonical Bridges for each existing ERC20 token: “deployers can deploy a Canonical Bridge for any token they want, this can be done only once p...
Lack of check for zero address in the function _transferOwnership before transferring ownership
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The absence of a check for the zero address address0 when transferring ownership can lead to unintended consequences and potential fund loss. If the contract allows transferring ownership to the zero address address0, it effectively means relinquishing...
Division before Multiplication could incur unnecessary precision loss
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Division before multiplication could incur unnecessary precision loss causing loss of funds. Proof of Concept In the dynamicQuorumVotes function of NounsDAOV3DynamicQuorum.sol contract the value of againstVotesBPS is first calculated by dividing a value ...
Proposal can executed even when it is in the "Queued" state.
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker can bypass the intended governance process and directly execute proposals that are still in the voting or canceled state. This can result in unauthorized actions being performed on the smart contract, leading to loss of funds Proof of Concept...
xalpha code injection vulnerability
xalpha is the full process management of a fund investment by Shixin Zhang, an individual developer in China. A security vulnerability exists in xalpha version v0.11.4, which stems from vulnerability to Remote Command Execution RCE attacks...
Anyone can receive funds from the Well.sol contract, thus reducing the token/tokenLp ratio for users
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In Well.sol skim, anyone can withdraw funds that are not in reserve by simply calling the function. Such funds may remain, for example, when transactions are rounded off. To credit extra tokens, reservetoken has sync. However, you can programmatically...
The AI Dividend
For four decades, Alaskans have opened their mailboxes to find checks waiting for them, their cut of the black gold beneath their feet. This is Alaskas Permanent Fund, funded by the states oil revenues and paid to every Alaskan each year. Were now in a different sort of resource rush, with...
Vulnerable to MEV exploitation due to lack of slippage protection
Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept Function to decrease and increase liquidity are passing amount0Min and amount1Min as zero. This will result in MEV bots sandwiching transactions to extract value from it. In the worst case it will actually return zero or a very small value in...
Bad accounting on ERC4626MultiToken.sol leads to user funds stuck in the contract
Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Bad accounting on ERC4626MultiToken.sol leads to user funds stuck in the contract on deposit and withdraw logic. Vulnerability Detail The UlyssesToken unified liquidity tokens are derived from ERC4626Multitoken. This is an standard tokenized vault with...
Many create methods are suspicious of the reorg attack
Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept There are many instance of this, but to understand things better, taking the example of createTalosV3Strategy method. The createTalosV3Strategy function deploys a new TalosStrategyStaked contract using the create, where the address derivation...
Using msg.value instead of sharesAmount while depositing Ether through Lido can lead to a loss of funds as stETH is not pegged to ETH with 1:1 ratio
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In case stETH is not pegged to ETH with 1:1 ratio, the LybraStETHVault.sol will still store all deposits in ETH value after converting to stETH. Also, the emitted event does not return the received stETH amount sharesAmount, but msg.value twice. This mig...