2046 matches found
Compounding is vulnerable to sandwich attack
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function compound is called in every deposit/withdraw in AutoPxGmx contract. It claim rewards in form of gmxBaseReward and swap them to gmx token. They used amountOutMinimum from input params gmxAmountOut = SWAPROUTER.exactInputSingle...
Users can block other users from redeeming their ETH in Vaults
Lines of code Vulnerability details The burnLPToken of a protected vault allow users to burn LP tokens in exchange of ETH or dETH. In the case of ETH, ie when the BLS key has not had its derivatives minted yet, the function checks the liquidity is not fresh by checking...
Reentrancy attack on fee transferring
Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details Description There is execute function in the Exchange smart contract. The function matches two orders, ensuring the validity of the match, transfers the order fees, etc. When transferring fees, the contract just makes a call to the...
Theft of ETH that was not used for the successful execution of orders
Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There are execute and bulkExecute functions in Exchange smart contract. There is the refund of any ETH that was unused for example that was left due to the unsuccessful order execution at the end of its execution flow: returnDust; returnDust functio...
Public to all funds escape
Lines of code Vulnerability details Description The LooksRareAggregator smart contract implements a bunch of functions to escape funds by the contract owner see rescueETH, rescueERC20, rescueERC721, and rescueERC1155. In this way, any funds that were accidentally sent to the contract or were lock...
Initialization function can be front-run
Lines of code Vulnerability details Detailed description of the impact of this finding: Exchange.sol has initialization function that can be front-run, allowing an attacker to incorrectly initialize the contract. Due to the use of the delegatecall proxy pattern, Exchange.sol cannot be initialized...
Theft of ETH that was not used for successful execution of orders in non-atomic execution
Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There is an execute function in LooksRareAggregator contract. It refunds any ETH that was unused for example that left due to the unsuccessful execution of an order at the end of its execution flow: returnETHIfAnyoriginator; returnETHIfAny function ...
Unsafe Initializations Of Bridge Contracts
Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details During the zkSync initialization process, several complicated tasks would be required to execute. Incorrect configurations in some tasks could lead to unexpected vulnerabilities. One task of the zkSync initialization process is deploying a...
Front-running of bid calls
Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There is bid function in the SizeSealed contract. The function accepts the auctionId, which does not contain any information about the auction itself. As a result, transactions of users can be front-runned to enforce them bid for the auction with th...
Hacker can front-run the L2 ERC20 token deployment.
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact hacker can front-run the L2 ERC20 token deployment to block L2 ERC20 token finalizeDeposit Proof of Concept I intend to prove this piece of code is front-runnable by hacker: /// @notice Finalize the deposit and mint funds /// @param l1Sender The account...
SimpleERC20Escrow's initialize() can be frontrun
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The user's collateral is not held in the market contract but is instead held in individual escrows. Every user has a unique escrow for every market. And the escrow contracts are created via the Market contract's createEscrow function. And it's initialize...
Front-running of a pledge call
Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There is pledge function in the WardenPledge contract. The function accepts the pledgeId, which does not contain any information about the pledge itself. As a result, transactions of users can be front-runned to enforce them use the pledge with the...
Front-running approve function
Lines of code Vulnerability details Description There is approve function in a DolaBorrowingRights. Let's say that Alice wants to increase the approval for Bob from 10 to 20. Alice calls the approve or permit function. Then, Bob can front-run the transaction by spending the 10 tokens and getting...
Approve front-running attack in DBR.sol
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker could front-run an approve transaction to get an overall bigger amount approved. Proof of Concept This is the approve function of the DBR token. function approveaddress spender, uint256 amount public virtual returns bool...
Dependency-Track å®å Øę¼ę“
Dependency-Track is an intelligent supply chain component analysis platform for identifying third-party component risks. A security vulnerability exists in versions of Dependency-Track prior to 4.6.1 that stems from not coding or cleaning up the output of Showdown, which allows arbitrary JavaScri...
it is possible to front run the deployHolographableContract and alter the configuration
Lines of code Vulnerability details deployHolographableContract uses abi.encodePacked to encode configuration data and make the hash . thats while when using abi.encodePacked instead of abi.encode with dynamic types may result in some issues...
untyped data signing
Lines of code Vulnerability details in function deployHolographableContract the bytes32 hash is directly encoded without adding any domain separator . this will cause several issues an attacker can front run the signature and use them on same contract on another chain . eg a user wants to call...
LBPair swap() can be front-runned, a malicious attacker can call swap with higher gas than a user, getting the user swap amount transferred to the attacker address
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the LBPair.sol contract, when a user calls swap after transferring tokens to the Pair, a malicious attacker can front-run that tx then call swap on the same pair with the parameter to changed to an malicious address of his choice, paying a higher gass...
TP-Link TL-WR841N Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
TP-Link TL-WR841N is a wireless router from TP-LINK, China. TP-Link TL-WR841N is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting vulnerability, which originates from a front-end that does not filter special characters and can be exploited by attackers to cause cross-site scripting attacks...
TP-LINK TL-WR841N č·Øē«čę¬ę¼ę“
TP-Link TL-WR841N is a wireless router from TP-LINK, China. TP-Link TL-WR841N is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting vulnerability, which originates from a front-end that does not filter special characters and can be exploited by attackers to cause cross-site scripting attacks...