Possible Front Running on the Permit function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It could cause damage to third parties who use the permit method for transferring the tokens. Proof of Concept The well contract extends the ERC20Permit.sol, which contains a permit function that allow users to transfer assets with signatures. / @dev...

Well.shift could suffer from front-running attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The usage of Well.shift is described in the comment: 2. Using a router with shift: WETH.transfersender=0xUSER, recipient=Well1 1 Call the router, which performs: Well1.shifttokenOut=DAI, recipient=Well2 DAI.transfersender=Well1, recipient=Well2 2...

Stealing excess tokens from other users by either front-running skim function or calling it before legitimate user

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact File /src/interfaces/IWell.sol comment's defines what the skim function is being responsible for: / @notice Sends excess tokens held by the Well to the recipient. @param recipient The address to send the tokens @return skimAmounts The amount of each toke...

The first disputer might lose funds although his dispute is valid.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The first disputer might lose funds although his dispute is valid. Proof of Concept Users can dispute the current tree using disputeTree and the governor refunds the dispute funds if the dispute is valid in resolveDispute. function disputeTreestring memo...

Not using slippage parameter when interacting with AMMs

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The slippage parameters are hardcoded to 0, meaning the minimum amount can be 0. The absence of slippage protection causes transactions to be vulnerable to front running. This can result in users potentially losing their funds. Proof of Concept...

RootBridgeAgent.redeemSettlement can be front-run using RootBridgeAgent.retrySettlement causing redeem DoS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since RootBridgeAgent.retrySettlement... can be called by anyone for any settlement, a malicious actor can front-run an user trying to redeem his failed settlement via RootBridgeAgent.redeemSettlement... by calling RootBridgeAgent.retrySettlement... with...

In MulticallRootRouter.sol, approve function can fail for non standard ERC20 tokens like USDT

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some tokens like USDT do not work when changing the allowance from an existing non-zero allowance value. For example Tether USDT’s approve function will revert if the current approval is not zero, to protect against front-running changes of approvals. Li...

Building intelligent Spring Apps with Azure OpenAI

Note from Josh: Hi, Spring fans! I wanted to cross post this article looking at using Spring and Azure OpenAI from Microsoft's Sean Li because it's interesting: enjoy! Integrating cutting-edge artificial intelligence into apps has become a new trend in today's technological landscape. Spring is t...

Lenovo ThinkSystem 安全漏洞

Lenovo ThinkSystem is a ThinkSystem series server device from Lenovo, a Chinese company. A security vulnerability exists in Lenovo ThinkSystem. An attacker exploited the vulnerability to execute commands without sufficient privileges on SMM v1, SMM v2, and FPC using specially designed Web...

Schedule recovery DOS by front-running with original schedule recovery transaction if no other transaction is executed

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description If after scheduling a recovery no transaction is executed, anyone can DOS the execution of this scheduled recovery by a signature replay attack given that the nonce is not increased Impact DOS of scheduled recovery execution if after a recovery is...

Adiscon LogAnalyzer SQL注入漏洞

Adiscon LogAnalyzer is a set of web front-end tools for system logs and other network event data. The tool provides log browsing, search and basic analysis, and graphical display. A security vulnerability exists in Adiscon LogAnalyzer v4.1.13 and earlier versions that stems from vulnerability to...

WordPress WP Front User Submit / Front Editor Plugin < 3.8.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS)

Software WP Front User Submit / Front Editor Type Plugin Vulnerable versions 3.8.0 Fixed in 3.8.0 OWASP Top 10 A7: Cross-Site Scripting XSS Classification Cross Site Scripting XSS CVE N/A Patch priority High CVSS severity High 6.5 Developer Claim ownership PSID 8294b3556758 Credits Unknown Requir...

FRONT-RUNNING SUSCEPTIBILITY IN ADDBID()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Auction.addBid is susceptible to front-running attacks. This vulnerability presents a significant risk as participants with adequate knowledge or skill could manipulate Ethereum transaction ordering to gain undue advantage, potentially compromising the...

stake before unfreeze can take away most of rsr rewards in the freeze period

Lines of code Vulnerability details If the system is frozen, the only allowed operation is stRST.stake. And the payoutRewards is not called during freeze period: if !main.frozen payoutRewards; function payoutRewards external requireNotFrozen; payoutRewards; So the payoutLastPaid stays before the...

CVE-2021-4363

The WP Quick FrontEnd Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including, 5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the 'savecontentfront' function that uses printr on the user-supplied $REQUEST values . This makes ...

PT-2023-12495 · WordPress · Wp Quick Frontend Editor

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: WP Quick FrontEnd Editor plugin for WordPress versions up to and including 5.5 Description: The issue is related to page content injection due to missing capability checks in the plugin's page-editing functionality. This allows...

WordPress Plugin WP Quick FrontEnd Editor 跨站脚本漏洞

WordPress and WordPress plugin are both products of the WordPress Foundation.WordPress is a blogging platform developed using the PHP language. The platform supports personal blog sites on PHP and MySQL servers.WordPress plugin is an application plugin. A security vulnerability exists in the...

PT-2023-12474 · WordPress · Wp Quick Frontend Editor

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: WP Quick FrontEnd Editor plugin for WordPress versions up to, and including, 5.5 Description: The issue arises from insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the save content front function, which uses print r on user-supplied $...

up-front-works.jp Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3392336

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

up-front-works.jp Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3377166

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...