CVE-2026-25480 FileStore key canonicalization collisions allow response cache mixup/poisoning (ASCII ord + Unicode NFKD)

Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface ASGI framework. Prior to 2.20.0, FileStore maps cache keys to filenames using Unicode NFKD normalization and ord substitution without separators, creating key collisions. When FileStore is used as response-cache backend, an unauthenticated remo...

CVE-2026-25480 FileStore key canonicalization collisions allow response cache mixup/poisoning (ASCII ord + Unicode NFKD)

Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface ASGI framework. Prior to 2.20.0, FileStore maps cache keys to filenames using Unicode NFKD normalization and ord substitution without separators, creating key collisions. When FileStore is used as response-cache backend, an unauthenticated remo...

CVE-2026-25479

Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface ASGI framework. Prior to 2.20.0, in litestar.middleware.allowedhosts, allowlist entries are compiled into regex patterns in a way that allows regex metacharacters to retain special meaning e.g., . matches any character. This enables a bypass...

CVE-2026-25478

Litestar (ASGI framework) contains a vulnerability in CORSConfig.allowed_origins_regex prior to 2.20.0 where a regex built from allowlist values is used with fullmatch without escaping metacharacters, allowing a malicious origin to match unexpectedly. Impact is indicated as HIGH (CVSS 3.1: AV:N/A...

CVE-2026-25478 Litestar has a CORS origin allowlist bypass due to unescaped regex metacharacters in allowed origins

Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface ASGI framework. Prior to 2.20.0, CORSConfig.allowedoriginsregex is constructed using a regex built from configured allowlist values and used with fullmatch for validation. Because metacharacters are not escaped, a malicious origin can match...

CVE-2025-66630

Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Before 2.52.11, on Go versions prior to 1.24, the underlying crypto/rand implementation can return an error if secure randomness cannot be obtained. Because no error is returned by the Fiber v2 UUID functions, application code may...

CVE-2025-66630

Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Before 2.52.11, on Go versions prior to 1.24, the underlying crypto/rand implementation can return an error if secure randomness cannot be obtained. Because no error is returned by the Fiber v2 UUID functions, application code may...

CVE-2025-66630 Fiber insecurely fallsback in utils.UUIDv4() / utils.UUID() — predictable / zero‑UUID on crypto/rand failure

Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Before 2.52.11, on Go versions prior to 1.24, the underlying crypto/rand implementation can return an error if secure randomness cannot be obtained. Because no error is returned by the Fiber v2 UUID functions, application code may...

CVE-2025-66630 Fiber insecurely fallsback in utils.UUIDv4() / utils.UUID() — predictable / zero‑UUID on crypto/rand failure

Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Before 2.52.11, on Go versions prior to 1.24, the underlying crypto/rand implementation can return an error if secure randomness cannot be obtained. Because no error is returned by the Fiber v2 UUID functions, application code may...

CVE-2025-66630

Fiber is a Go web framework. Before 2.52.11 and on Go

CVE-2025-66630 Fiber insecurely fallsback in utils.UUIDv4() / utils.UUID() — predictable / zero‑UUID on crypto/rand failure

Fiber is an Express inspired web framework written in Go. Before 2.52.11, on Go versions prior to 1.24, the underlying crypto/rand implementation can return an error if secure randomness cannot be obtained. Because no error is returned by the Fiber v2 UUID functions, application code may...

Exploit for CVE-2026-23552

CVE-2026-23552 - Cross-Realm Token Acceptance in camel-keycloa...

DyMA-Fuzz: Dynamic Direct Memory Access Abstraction for Re-Hosted Monolithic Firmware Fuzzing

The rise of smart devices in critical domains--including automotive, medical, industrial--demands robust firmware testing. Fuzzing firmware in re-hosted environments is a promising method for automated testing at scale, but remains difficult due to the tight coupling of code with a...

Litestar 安全漏洞

Litestar is a powerful, flexible, yet stubbornly opinionated ASGI framework developed by Litestar itself. Versions of Litestar prior to 2.20.0 contained security vulnerabilities, which stemmed from the lack of escaping regular expression metacharacters, potentially allowing malicious sources to...

MUZZLE: Adaptive Agentic Red-Teaming of Web Agents against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks

Large language model LLM based web agents are increasingly deployed to automate complex online tasks by directly interacting with web sites and performing actions on users' behalf. While these agents offer powerful capabilities, their design exposes them to indirect prompt injection attacks...

Fiber 安全特征问题漏洞

Fiber is Fiber open source an open source Web framework written in Go language . Fiber suffers from a security signature issue vulnerability. The vulnerability stems from an error not returned by the UUID function and can be exploited by an attacker to use predictable or low entropy identifiers i...

pydantic-ai 代码问题漏洞

Pydantic-ai is a generative AI framework developed by Pydantic for building production-level applications and workflows. Pydantic-ai has code vulnerabilities, which stem from overly permissive Deno sandbox configurations. These vulnerabilities may lead to server-side request forgeing attacks...

One RNG to Rule Them All: How Randomness Becomes an Attack Vector in Machine Learning

Machine learning relies on randomness as a fundamental component in various steps such as data sampling, data augmentation, weight initialization, and optimization. Most machine learning frameworks use pseudorandom number generators as the source of randomness. However, variations in design choic...

Litestar 安全漏洞

Litestar is a powerful, flexible, yet stubbornly opinionated ASGI framework developed by Litestar itself. Versions of Litestar prior to 2.20.0 contained security vulnerabilities, which stemmed from improper compilation of allowlist entries, potentially allowing bypasses of hostname verification...

Litestar 安全漏洞

Litestar is a powerful, flexible, yet stubbornly opinionated ASGI framework developed by Litestar itself. Versions of Litestar prior to 2.20.0 contained security vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities were caused by key conflicts in the caching key mapping mechanism, which could lead to cache...