Lucene search
+L

448 matches found

OSV
OSV
•added 2026/06/18 1:52 p.m.•42 views

GHSA-FC26-M9PF-V56Q PraisonAI LinearBot processes unsigned webhooks when LINEAR_WEBHOOK_SECRET is missing

PraisonAI LinearBot processes unsigned webhooks when LINEARWEBHOOKSECRET is missing Summary PraisonAI's LinearBot starts a public webhook listener on 0.0.0.0 and treats LINEARWEBHOOKSECRET as optional. When the secret is absent, startup only logs a warning and handlewebhook skips Linear-Signature...

8.6CVSS6.5AI score
SaveExploits0References2
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/06/18 6:06 a.m.•20 views

CVE-2026-55744 Cotonti CSRF in PFS allows forced arbitrary file upload

Cotonti 1.0.0 master branch, commit f43f1fc3 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the Personal File Storage PFS module. In modules/pfs/inc/pfs.main.php, the file upload action 'a=upload' processes uploaded files without calling cotcheckxg to validate the anti-CSRF token, even though...

8.6CVSS5.3AI score
SaveExploits0References4
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/06/18 6:05 a.m.•69 views

CVE-2026-55742

Cotonti 1.0.0 (master, commit f43f1fc3) is vulnerable to CSRF in system/admin/admin.rights.php while performing the update action (a=update). The code path updates group access rights (including via cot_auth_add_group) without calling cot_check_xg() to validate an anti-CSRF token. A remote attack...

9.6CVSS5.9AI score0.00208EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/06/09 3:41 a.m.•64 views

CVE-2026-8910 WP Emoticon Rating <= 1.0.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via 'emo_settings' Parameter

The WP Emoticon Rating plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web...

6.1CVSS0.00179EPSS
SaveExploits0References7
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/06/09 3:41 a.m.•60 views

CVE-2026-8902 AJAX Report Comments <= 2.0.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update

The AJAX Report Comments plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the rcoptionspage function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings...

4.3CVSS0.00184EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/06/05 11:28 p.m.•62 views

CVE-2026-9719

CVE-2026-9719 concerns the LatePoint WordPress plugin (versions up to 5.6.0). The issue is a Cross‑Site Request Forgery caused by missing/incorrect nonce validation in the change_status function, enabling unauthenticated actors to alter invoice statuses (e.g., mark unpaid as paid) via forged requ...

4.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00201EPSS
SaveExploits0References8
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2026/06/05 7:28 p.m.•26 views

CVE-2026-4091

The OPEN-BRAIN plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.5.0. This is due to missing nonce verification on the settings form in the funcpagemain function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web...

6.1CVSS5.6AI score0.00215EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2026/06/05 7:13 p.m.•31 views

CVE-2026-40325

Masa CMS is a content management system forked from Mura CMS. In versions 7.5.2 and earlier, the cTrash.restore function does not properly validate anti-CSRF tokens for content restoration requests. An attacker can trick a logged-in administrator to submit a forged request that restores deleted...

8.7CVSS5.5AI score0.00214EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/06/02 9:16 a.m.•33 views

CVE-2026-4071

The BirdSeed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation in the birdseedpluginsettingspage function. The function processes the 'birdseedtoken' GET parameter and saves it to the database via...

4.3CVSS0.0019EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/06/02 7:48 a.m.•59 views

CVE-2026-9722 Laiser Tag <= 1.2.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Plugin Settings Update via Settings Form

The Laiser Tag plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the addOptionsPageFields function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's...

4.3CVSS0.0019EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/06/02 7:48 a.m.•18 views

CVE-2026-9722 Laiser Tag <= 1.2.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Plugin Settings Update via Settings Form

The Laiser Tag plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the addOptionsPageFields function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's...

4.3CVSS5.6AI score0.0019EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/06/02 7:48 a.m.•56 views

CVE-2026-8422

CVE-2026-8422 concerns the WordPress plugin Remove meta boxes per user role (versions up to and including 1.01). The vulnerability stems from missing or incorrect nonce validation on the remove-meta-boxes-per-user-role page, enabling CSRF. This could allow unauthenticated attackers to modify or r...

4.3CVSS5.6AI score0.00196EPSS
SaveExploits0References7
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/05/28 12:00 a.m.•49 views

PT-2026-44210

The PeachPay — Payments & Express Checkout for WooCommerce supports Stripe, PayPal, Square, Authorize.net, NMI plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.120.46. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the peachpay stri...

4.3CVSS5.7AI score0.00201EPSS
SaveExploits0References9
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/05/27 8:16 a.m.•36 views

CVE-2026-8942

The MetaMagic SEO Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the metamagicupdateoptions function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the...

4.3CVSS0.00184EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/05/27 7:45 a.m.•58 views

CVE-2026-8906 WP Promoter <= 1.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'popup_width' Parameter

The WP Promoter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts...

6.1CVSS0.00177EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/05/27 7:45 a.m.•41 views

EUVD-2026-32116

The WP Promoter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts...

6.1CVSS5.7AI score0.00177EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/05/27 5:31 a.m.•57 views

CVE-2026-7614

CVE-2026-7614 affects the WordPress plugin Old Posts Highlighter up to version 1.0.3. The root cause is missing or incorrect nonce validation on the OPH_options function, enabling Cross-Site Request Forgery. This allows unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin’s configuration by deceiving a...

4.3CVSS5.6AI score0.0019EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/05/27 12:00 a.m.•34 views

PT-2026-43497

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Old Posts Highlighter versions prior to 1.0.4 Description The Old Posts Highlighter plugin for WordPress is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery, a type of attack where an unauthorized user tricks a victim into performing actions they did...

4.3CVSS5.7AI score0.0019EPSS
SaveExploits0References8
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/05/27 12:00 a.m.•38 views

PT-2026-43535

The Search Simple Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the search simple fields options function in functions admin.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated...

4.3CVSS5.7AI score0.00184EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/05/26 9:16 p.m.•35 views

CVE-2026-48592

Missing Authorization vulnerability in oban-bg obanweb 'Elixir.Oban.Web.Jobs.DetailComponent' modules allows unauthorized job worker substitution. The handleevent"save-job", ... handler in 'Elixir.Oban.Web.Jobs.DetailComponent' does not perform an authorization check, unlike the sibling cancel,...

5.3CVSS0.00559EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Rows per page
Query Builder