14207 matches found
CVE-2026-84645
In Jenkins 2.579 and earlier, LTS 2.568.2 and earlier, objects of types marked as storing their configuration in independent top-level configuration files in Jenkins such as the global configuration and jobs can appear as nested field values in user-submitted config.xml documents and subsequently...
CVE-2026-84650
In Jenkins 2.579 and earlier, LTS 2.568.2 and earlier, transient fields cannot be excluded from deserialization, allowing attackers able to submit configuration updates to specify the values of transient fields that will be deserialized, the impact depending on how those fields are used...
Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
Appium is vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting XSS. The vulnerability is due to unsanitized reflection of user-controlled query parameters, POST fields, and HTTP headers into HTML, which allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript on the server origin...
CVE-2026-84654
In Stapler 2107.v8dfcbe8ed317 and earlier, except 2088.2093.vd7c3e58008a6, included in Jenkins 2.579 and earlier, LTS 2.568.2 and earlier, form data binding allows setting public static fields of the bound configuration object, allowing attackers who can submit configuration forms to modify publi...
EUVD-2026-70120
In Stapler 2107.v8dfcbe8ed317 and earlier, except 2088.2093.vd7c3e58008a6, included in Jenkins 2.579 and earlier, LTS 2.568.2 and earlier, form data binding allows setting public static fields of the bound configuration object, allowing attackers who can submit configuration forms to modify publi...
CVE-2026-84654
In Stapler 2107.v8dfcbe8ed317 and earlier, except 2088.2093.vd7c3e58008a6, included in Jenkins 2.579 and earlier, LTS 2.568.2 and earlier, form data binding allows setting public static fields of the bound configuration object, allowing attackers who can submit configuration forms to modify publi...
CVE-2026-84654
In Stapler 2107.v8dfcb_e8ed317 and earlier (except 2088.2093.vd7c3e58008a_6 ), which are included in Jenkins 2.579 and earlier (LTS 2.568.2 and earlier), a form data binding vulnerability exists. This flaw allows an attacker capable of submitting configuration forms to modify public static fields...
CVE-2026-84650
In Jenkins 2.579 and earlier, LTS 2.568.2 and earlier, transient fields cannot be excluded from deserialization, allowing attackers able to submit configuration updates to specify the values of transient fields that will be deserialized, the impact depending on how those fields are used...
EUVD-2026-70116
In Jenkins 2.579 and earlier, LTS 2.568.2 and earlier, transient fields cannot be excluded from deserialization, allowing attackers able to submit configuration updates to specify the values of transient fields that will be deserialized, the impact depending on how those fields are used...
CVE-2026-84650
In Jenkins 2.579 and earlier (including LTS 2.568.2 and earlier ), a vulnerability exists where transient fields cannot be excluded from deserialization. This allows an attacker to submit configuration updates that specify values for these transient fields during deserialization, with the impact ...
CVE-2026-84650
In Jenkins 2.579 and earlier, LTS 2.568.2 and earlier, transient fields cannot be excluded from deserialization, allowing attackers able to submit configuration updates to specify the values of transient fields that will be deserialized, the impact depending on how those fields are used...
CVE-2026-84650
In Jenkins 2.579 and earlier, LTS 2.568.2 and earlier, transient fields cannot be excluded from deserialization, allowing attackers able to submit configuration updates to specify the values of transient fields that will be deserialized, the impact depending on how those fields are used...
SUSE CVE-2026-74391
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Bound synthetic-field strings with seqbuf The synthetic field helpers build a prefixed synthetic variable name and a generated hist command in fixed MAXFILTERSTRVAL buffers. The current code appends those strings with ra...
SUSE CVE-2026-82661
Nodemailer before 8.0.9 fails to sanitize carriage return and line feed characters in list comment fields, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary message headers. An attacker with control over list..comment parameters can inject CRLF sequences to create additional headers in generated RFC822...
CVE-2026-12526
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.7 does not verify that the requester is authorized to edit the targeted user account in the update-user action of its front-end Forms module; it only checks a capability when the submitted role is administrator or superadmin. On a...
EUVD-2026-69846
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.7 does not restrict the role submitted through its front-end user forms to the roles the form actually offers, and its safeguard against privileged roles is incomplete, allowing unauthenticated visitors to register an account with...
CVE-2026-80467
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin (versions 0.9.2.2 through 0.9.2.6 ) contains an unauthenticated privilege escalation vulnerability. The root cause is improper server-side validation and incomplete safeguards regarding the role field in front-end user forms. Specifically, the...
CVE-2026-12526
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin (versions before 0.9.2.7 ) contains an unauthenticated administrator account takeover vulnerability in its front-end Forms module . The root cause is a failure to verify if a requester is authorized to edit the targeted user account during the...
CVE-2026-12526 Advanced Custom Fields: Extended < 0.9.2.7 - Unauthenticated Administrator Account Takeover via Front-End User Update Action
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.7 does not verify that the requester is authorized to edit the targeted user account in the update-user action of its front-end Forms module; it only checks a capability when the submitted role is administrator or superadmin. On a...
CVE-2026-12526 Advanced Custom Fields: Extended < 0.9.2.7 - Unauthenticated Administrator Account Takeover via Front-End User Update Action
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.7 does not verify that the requester is authorized to edit the targeted user account in the update-user action of its front-end Forms module; it only checks a capability when the submitted role is administrator or superadmin. On a...