openPosition() use stale feeGrowthInside0LastX128/feeGrowthInside1LastX128

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details When openPosition, we need to record the current feeGrowthInside0LastX128/feeGrowthInside1LastX128. And when closing the position, we use Base.getOwedFee to calculate the possible fees generated during the borrowing period, which are used ...

Using addPremium() to evade part of the fees from marginFrom

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details When openPosition, we will charge a certain fee, the calculation formula is as follows: marginFrom + amountFromBorrowed FEEFACTOR / Base.BASISPOINT It will include marginFrom, which is mainly used to ensure enough collateralTo after swap,...

Add premium doesn't collect fees

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Fees are applied to premiums when a new position is opened, but the same mechanism is not enforced when margin is added to an existing position. Impact When a new position is created in the LAMM protocol, fees are collected in favor of the LP owner that...

PT-2023-31445 · Unknown · School Management System

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: School Fees Management System version 1.0 Description: A cross-site scripting XSS issue in the /admin/parent component allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the name parameter...

Calls to get_virtual_price() are vulnerable to read-only reentrancy

Lines of code 117 Vulnerability details getvirtualprice was originally considered to be a manipulation-resistant price - suitable as a price oracle, but it was later found to be vulnerable to a read-only reentrancy attack, where the Curve contract could be put into a partially-modified state, and...

PT-2023-31446 · Unknown · School Management System

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: School Fees Management System version 1.0 Description: A cross-site scripting XSS issue in the /management/term component allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the tname parameter...

PT-2023-31441 · Unknown · School Management System

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: School Fees Management System version 1.0 Description: The issue allows attackers to escalate privileges and perform administrative actions, including adding and deleting user accounts, due to broken access control in the...

PT-2023-31443 · Unknown · School Management System

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: School Fees Management System version 1.0 Description: A cross-site scripting XSS issue in the /management/settings component allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the name parameter...

PT-2023-31440 · Unknown · School Management System

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: School Fees Management System version 1.0 Description: A directory listing issue allows attackers to list directories and sensitive files within the application without requiring authorization. Recommendations: For School Fees Management Syst...

PT-2023-31442 · Unknown · School Management System

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: School Fees Management System version 1.0 Description: A cross-site scripting XSS issue in the /management/class component allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the name parameter...

Unrestricted Unwrap Fee Changes: Instability, Market Disruption, and Loss of Trust

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The current changeUnwrapFee function in the Ocean smart contract allows the owner to change the unwrap fee divisor with no restrictions, leading to several negative impacts: 1. Unstable Unwrap Fees: Frequent changes in the divisor can cause instability a...

Users can unwrap assets in batches and avoid paying fees to protocol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Users can unwrap their assets from The Ocean and evade paying fees to the protocol when the requested amount is smaller than the fee divisor. This happens due to a truncation of the result in the fee calculation. Proof of Concept This affects the...

improper validations result in loss of funds.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact due the improper validation on amount , the users can pass Amount as 0 the calculated fee will be 0 and safeTranferFrom will pass. function getNFTMintingPriceuint256 id, uint256 amount public view returns uint256 fee address bondingCurve =...

Fee for minting the Market Nft token can be manipulated

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Fee of minting the Market's NFT is calculated based on total share count tokenCount. Such approach opens a way to collect big fees for fee recipients by deliberately stacking share tokens. address bondingCurve = shareDataid.bondingCurve; uint256...

fees model is counter-productive

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Fees become more and more expensive as there are more buys in the share. Fees are collected when a user buy/sell/mint/burn. As the protocol or the share creator, you would want to earn more rewards which is done if a lot of users are buying in or if a lo...

Reentrancy leads to minting/burning/buying without paying the correct amount of fees

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Fee calculations depends on shareDataid.tokenCount, which is updated AFTER doing the transfer of token. That means, if the token is an ERC777 compatible token, users can reenter the function paying, for example, less fees on a buy operation. Proof of...

Sanctionned funds keep earning APR, and protocol earning fees on these funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When a user is sanctioned, if he has a scaledBalance not in the withdrawal queue, calling the nukeFromOrbit function will send sanctioned funds to an escrow contract, and these funds will keep earning APR. This is because when a deposit is executed, the...

Front-Running during Proxy Creation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An ill-intentioned party might front run every proxy contracts creation and deploy one first causing the transaction for every user to revert. It is worth noting that for this attack to succeed, the attacker would need to get their transaction mined in t...

CVE-2015-6964

MultiBit HD before 0.1.2 allows attackers to conduct bit-flipping attacks that insert unspendable Bitcoin addresses into the list that MultiBit uses to send fees to the developers. Attackers cannot realistically steal these fees for themselves. This occurs because there is no message authenticati...

CVE-2015-6964

MultiBit HD before 0.1.2 allows attackers to conduct bit-flipping attacks that insert unspendable Bitcoin addresses into the list that MultiBit uses to send fees to the developers. Attackers cannot realistically steal these fees for themselves. This occurs because there is no message authenticati...