@fumapress/ai (>=0.2.3, <=0.2.5), @fumapress/feedback (>=0.2.4, <=0.2.5) +4 more potentially affected by CVE-2026-49456 via waku (>=0.19.4, <=1.0.0-beta.0)

waku NPM version =0.19.4, =0.2.3, =0.2.4, =1.0.0, =0.1.0, =0.2.5 - sakuin 0.1.0-alpha.1 - sladocs 0.1.0 Source cves: CVE-2026-49456 Source advisory: MEND:CVE-2026-49456...

@fumapress/ai (>=0.2.3, <=0.2.5), @fumapress/feedback (>=0.2.4, <=0.2.5) +4 more potentially affected by CVE-2026-49455 via waku (>=0.19.4, <=1.0.0-beta.0)

waku NPM version =0.19.4, =0.2.3, =0.2.4, =1.0.0, =0.1.0, =0.2.5 - sakuin 0.1.0-alpha.1 - sladocs 0.1.0 Source cves: CVE-2026-49455 Source advisory: MEND:CVE-2026-49455...

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

Overview chainlit is a Build Conversational AI. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in the feedback PUT and DELETE endpoints in backend/chainlit/server.py. An authenticated attacker can modify or delete other users’ feedback by...

SIR: Self-Improving Red-Teaming for Compute Use Agents

Computer use agents CUAs are vision-language models that perceive a screen and act on a real operating system through mouse, keyboard, and terminal, and they are increasingly deployed to automate everyday digital tasks. Because they can be exposed to untrusted content while operating, they are...

CVE-2026-82290

Chainlit through 2.12.0 fails to validate ownership of feedback records in PUT and DELETE endpoints. Authenticated attackers can delete or modify other users' feedback by supplying arbitrary feedback identifiers, corrupting human-rating data used for model evaluation...

SUSE CVE-2026-80575

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space cs40l50add copies the custom data of an FFPERIODIC/FFCUSTOM effect straight from the ffeffect the user passed to EVIOCSFF, without requiring it to hold anything:...

EUVD-2026-67821

Chainlit through 2.12.0 fails to validate ownership of feedback records in PUT and DELETE endpoints. Authenticated attackers can delete or modify other users' feedback by supplying arbitrary feedback identifiers, corrupting human-rating data used for model evaluation...

CVE-2026-82290 Chainlit Feedback Endpoints Missing Ownership Validation

Chainlit through 2.12.0 fails to validate ownership of feedback records in PUT and DELETE endpoints. Authenticated attackers can delete or modify other users' feedback by supplying arbitrary feedback identifiers, corrupting human-rating data used for model evaluation...

CVE-2026-82290 Chainlit Feedback Endpoints Missing Ownership Validation

Chainlit through 2.12.0 fails to validate ownership of feedback records in PUT and DELETE endpoints. Authenticated attackers can delete or modify other users' feedback by supplying arbitrary feedback identifiers, corrupting human-rating data used for model evaluation...

CVE-2026-82290 Chainlit Feedback Endpoints Missing Ownership Validation

Chainlit through 2.12.0 fails to validate ownership of feedback records in PUT and DELETE endpoints. Authenticated attackers can delete or modify other users' feedback by supplying arbitrary feedback identifiers, corrupting human-rating data used for model evaluation...

CVE-2026-82290

Chainlit through version 2.12.0 fails to validate ownership of feedback records in its PUT and DELETE endpoints. The root cause is a missing ownership check, allowing authenticated attackers to delete or modify other users' feedback by supplying arbitrary feedback identifiers. The practical conse...

CVE-2026-82290

Chainlit through 2.12.0 fails to validate ownership of feedback records in PUT and DELETE endpoints. Authenticated attackers can delete or modify other users' feedback by supplying arbitrary feedback identifiers, corrupting human-rating data used for model evaluation...

CVE-2026-82290: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

Chainlit through 2.12.0 fails to validate ownership of feedback records in PUT and DELETE endpoints. Authenticated attackers can delete or modify other users' feedback by supplying arbitrary feedback identifiers, corrupting human-rating data used for model evaluation...

PT-2026-83313

Chainlit through 2.12.0 fails to validate ownership of feedback records in PUT and DELETE endpoints. Authenticated attackers can delete or modify other users' feedback by supplying arbitrary feedback identifiers, corrupting human-rating data used for model evaluation...

From Concept to Context Engine: How Wiz Built AI-Powered Data Discovery

Inside the multi-agent pipeline and feedback loops that turned a bucket scanner into a context engine...

CVE-2026-80575

A flaw was found in the Linux kernel. The cs40l50-vibra driver, responsible for haptic feedback, improperly validates the length of custom data provided by a local user. This insufficient validation can lead to out-of-bounds reads and accesses when processing specially crafted input. A local...

CVE-2026-80575

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space cs40l50add copies the custom data of an FFPERIODIC/FFCUSTOM effect straight from the ffeffect the user passed to EVIOCSFF, without requiring it to hold anything:...

UBUNTU-CVE-2026-80575

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space cs40l50add copies the custom data of an FFPERIODIC/FFCUSTOM effect straight from the ffeffect the user passed to EVIOCSFF, without requiring it to hold anything:...

CVE-2026-80575 Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space cs40l50add copies the custom data of an FFPERIODIC/FFCUSTOM effect straight from the ffeffect the user passed to EVIOCSFF, without requiring it to hold anything:...

CVE-2026-80575

CVE-2026-80575 affects the cs40l50-vibra Linux kernel input driver (a haptic vibration controller). The function cs40l50_add() copies user-supplied custom_data from an FF_PERIODIC/FF_CUSTOM effect via the EVIOCSFF ioctl without sufficient validation. Three distinct issues exist: custom_len == 0 c...