Exchange.sol#L87 : openTrade is returning incorrect totalCost value which has accounting issue when open or closing the trade.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It returns the incorrect value. Any operation done based on this function,either at front end of at contract level , could end with incorrect output. Proof of Concept User can interact with Exchangle.sol to trade. He/she will call the openTrade. openTrad...

Uneven deduction of performance fee causes some KangarooVault users to lose part of their token value

Lines of code Vulnerability details In KangarooVault.resetTrade, a performanceFee is charged upon closing of all positions, on the premiumCollected. This is inconsistent with getTokenPrice as premiumCollected is factored in the token price computation, while the performanceFee is not. This leads ...

[H-01] User that fuse more tiles to Namespace NFT pay lesser fusing costs instead of greater

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User that fuses more tiles will pay lesser fusing costs to revenueAddress instead of higher cost as intended Proof of Concept Namespace.solL110-L114 /Namespace.sol 110: function fuseCharacterData calldata characterList external 111: uint256 numCharacters...

Operator can cause funds to be stolen by manipulating gas fee refund

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An operator can manipulate the refund of gas fee mechanism to steal from the bootloader balance. Inside refundCurrentL2Transaction function in the bootloader where the refund is happening for the refund recipient at L1097, the operator provides a value f...

The price fee for fusion characters is incorrect.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details Price fee for fusion characters is incorrect. According to the docs Fusing To fuse a namespace NFT, the user specifies the trays and the tiles offsets within the trays to use. Note that the whole tray is always burned, even if you only use...

CVE-2023-27041

School Registration and Fee System v1.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the id parameter at/bilal final/edituser.php...

CVE-2023-27041

School Registration and Fee System v1.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the id parameter at/bilal final/edituser.php...

Sql injection

School Registration and Fee System v1.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the id parameter at/bilal final/edituser.php...

School Registration and Fee System SQL注入漏洞

School Registration and Fee System is a school registration and fee system by hemedy99 individual developer. A security vulnerability exists in School Registration and Fee System v1.0, which is caused by a SQL injection vulnerability in the id parameter of /bilal final/edituser.php...

PT-2023-20914 · Unknown · School Registration/Fee System

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: School Registration and Fee System version 1.0 Description: The issue is related to a SQL injection vulnerability. This vulnerability can be exploited via the id parameter at the "/bilal final/edit user.php" API endpoint. Recommendations: For...

CVE-2023-27041: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command

School Registration and Fee System v1.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the id parameter at/bilal final/edituser.php...

CVE-2023-27041

School Registration and Fee System v1.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the id parameter at/bilal final/edituser.php...

Redemption fee increase can be thwarted

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The mechanism to increase the baseRate during redemptions is moot, up to gas fees. Therefore an arbitrageur can redeem more than what is healthy for the supply of LUSD. This weakens the price floor at $1, and may cause needless volatility. It further...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #356 [1677633435546]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 356 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-01 ERC4626 does not work with fee-on-transfer tokens in project Impact ERC20 token contract can be deposited with the deposit function. With the following part of the code, the ERC20 transfer from msg.sender to the...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #795 [1677634051278]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 795 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: 01 FEE-ON-TRANSFER TOKENS ARE NOT SUPPORTED This protocol currently does not support fee-on-transfer tokens. For example, for a fee-on-transfer token, calling the following Vault.deposit function with the assets inpu...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #92 [1677633054022]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 92 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-09 ERC4626 does not work with fee-on-transfer tokens Description The ERC4626 deposit/mint functions do not work well with fee-on-transfer tokens as the assets variable is the pre-fee amount, including the fee, where...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #523 [1677626174331]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 523 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: Title Add function for feeRecipient change in MultiRewardEscrow.sol contract Links to affected code Vulnerability details Impact If account feeRecipient would be compromised, or the protocol owner wants from some oth...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #823 [1677594201547]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 823 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-01 Low level call result not correctly checked The last adminProxy.execute is not checked for success. function deployAdapter DeploymentArgs memory adapterData, bytes memory baseAdapterData, IDeploymentController...

MultiRewardStaking does not work with fee-on-transfer tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details The way MultiRewardStaking handles deposits does not work with fee-on-transfer tokens: deposit uses convertToShares to compute the number of shares to mint, which returns assets - ie a 1:1 equivalence between shares and the number of asset tokens. 98: function...

managementFee is unfair and can be used to steal stakers deposits

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description managementFee is a fee that is taken on TVL and calculated per year: File: Vault.sol 429: function accruedManagementFee public view returns uint256 430: uint256 managementFee = fees.management; 431: return 432: managementFee 0 433: ?...