Lucene search
+L

487 matches found

Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/07/21 12:0 a.m.11 views

newer tx can remain un approved due nto previous tx not passing

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Newer transaction will not get approved because previous on es have not been approved or rejected Proof of Concept Let's say two out of 3 addresses sign a transaction which requires 3 signers then after some time the 3 now sign another transaction it won...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/07/05 12:0 a.m.21 views

Vulnerable to MEV exploitation due to lack of slippage protection

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept Function to decrease and increase liquidity are passing amount0Min and amount1Min as zero. This will result in MEV bots sandwiching transactions to extract value from it. In the worst case it will actually return zero or a very small value in...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
vulnersOsv
vulnersOsv
added 2023/06/19 7:46 p.m.8 views

4337-snap (>=0.1.0 <=0.1.1), @0xflair/contracts-registry (>=0.107.10 <=0.123.2) +336 more potentially affected by CVE-2023-34459 via @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable (>=4.7.0 <=4.8.3)

@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable NPM version =4.7.0, =0.1.0, =0.107.10, =1.9.0, =0.107.0, =0.107.0, =0.107.0, =0.69.0, =0.107.0, =0.97.1, =0.107.0, =0.107.0, =0.107.0, =4.0.0, =2.0.0, =3.1.0 - @abheektripathy/nftpass =1.1.0 and more Source cves: CVE-2023-34459 Source advisory:...

5.9CVSS6.2AI score0.00371EPSS
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/06/14 12:0 a.m.17 views

The low-level call returns true if the address does not exist

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact As written in the Solidity documentation , the call, delegatecall and staticcall low-level functions return true as its first return value if the account being invoked does not exist, as part of the design of the EVM. The existence of the account must be...

7.4AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/06/04 12:0 a.m.88 views

Chain split caused by memory corruption in EVM

Lines of code Vulnerability details Chain split caused by memory corruption in EVM We recently found that the op-geth@3fa9e81 repository has a memory corruption vulnerability in EVM, which can cause a consensus error. Specifically, vulnerable nodes obtain a different stateRoot when processing a...

5CVSS7AI score0.01325EPSS
SaveExploits0
NVD
NVD
added 2023/05/08 5:15 p.m.43 views

CVE-2023-30837

Vyper is a pythonic smart contract language for the EVM. The storage allocator does not guard against allocation overflows in versions prior to 0.3.8. An attacker can overwrite the owner variable. This issue was fixed in version 0.3.8...

7.5CVSS7.4AI score0.00697EPSS
SaveExploits1References2
Prion
Prion
added 2023/05/08 5:15 p.m.19 views

Code injection

Vyper is a pythonic smart contract language for the EVM. The storage allocator does not guard against allocation overflows in versions prior to 0.3.8. An attacker can overwrite the owner variable. This issue was fixed in version 0.3.8...

5CVSS7.4AI score0.00697EPSS
SaveExploits1References2Affected Software1
CVE
CVE
added 2023/05/08 4:3 p.m.76 views

CVE-2023-30837

CVE-2023-30837 (Vyper) affects the Vyper compiler/language prior to version 0.3.8, where the storage allocator does not guard against allocation overflows. This can allow an attacker to overwrite the owner variable in affected contracts. The issue is fixed in version 0.3.8. Multiple connected sou...

7.5CVSS7.3AI score0.00697EPSS
SaveExploits1References2Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2023/05/08 4:3 p.m.51 views

CVE-2023-30837 Vyper storage allocator overflow

Vyper is a pythonic smart contract language for the EVM. The storage allocator does not guard against allocation overflows in versions prior to 0.3.8. An attacker can overwrite the owner variable. This issue was fixed in version 0.3.8...

7.5CVSS7.6AI score0.00697EPSS
SaveExploits1References2
OSV
OSV
added 2023/05/08 4:3 p.m.21 views

CVE-2023-30837 Vyper storage allocator overflow

Vyper is a pythonic smart contract language for the EVM. The storage allocator does not guard against allocation overflows in versions prior to 0.3.8. An attacker can overwrite the owner variable. This issue was fixed in version 0.3.8...

7.5CVSS7.3AI score
SaveExploits0References4
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/03/19 12:0 a.m.11 views

DefaultAccount will add system call flag to any call with msg.value

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact As mentioned in the repo's README.md documentation: isSystem flag. Whether the call intends a system contracts' function. While most of the system contracts' functions are relatively harmless, accessing some with calldata only may break the invariants of...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/03/19 12:0 a.m.22 views

EVM Elliptic Curve Recovery Discrepancy

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Ecrecover.yul file meant to simulate the ecrecover mechanism as executed by traditional ETH 1.0 consensus mechanisms is incorrect. In detail, it does not conform to the "Homestead" update which introduced an upper-bound check for s values of an r, s,...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/03/19 12:0 a.m.19 views

Gas check inaccuracy

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since the gas forwarded will be limited to 63/64 of the total gasleft, L1 transactions will be vulnerable of being reverted. To achieve 1:1 partity with the EVM, the ZKEVM should account for 1/64 rule. Please refer to the 1/64 rule here. The actual amoun...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/02/06 12:0 a.m.10 views

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #670 [1675726386915]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 670 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: L-03 DoS if address owns too many receipts With time it is viable for users to acquire thousands and tens of thousands of receipts. This may happen as a result of buying receipts for example, which was highlighted as...

6.6AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/12/09 12:0 a.m.15 views

Oracle will become invalid much faster than intended on non-mainnet chains

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description NFTFloorOracle is in charge of answering price queries for ERC721 assets. EXPIRATIONPERIOD constant is the max amount of blocks allowed to have passed for the reading to be considered up to date: uint256 diffBlock = currentBlock - priceInfo.updatedA...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/11/28 12:0 a.m.8 views

CallEVM does not validate the existence of the address being called

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Evm.go's CallEVM function performs a EVM call to a given address with an input amount. However, the existence of the address is not validated. If the call is made with an amount to a contract, where it might be deleted or non-existed, the funds will be...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/11/28 12:0 a.m.6 views

The recipient address check during handling register events will confuse users and block the users contracts registering

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The check about if the receiver account exists in the evm store doesn't make sense and will cause users to encounter a confusing exception. And the RegisterEvent function will not throw an exception to revert the tx, the source contract will be wrote in...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/11/27 12:0 a.m.22 views

Incorrect fee distribution due to reorg

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the PostTxProcessing hook, new events are processed immediately and the addresstokenid mapping is registered to the keeper. The keeper throw an error upon duplicated registration. When there is a chain reorg that changed the registration on the EVM...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/11/26 12:0 a.m.10 views

evm_hooks ignores some important errors

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some contracts and some Turnstile tokens nfts wll not be able to receive CSR fees forever. Proof of Concept In evmhooks.go, the PostTxProcessing will call h.processEventsctx, receipt to handle Register and Assign events from Turnstile contract first:...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/11/26 12:0 a.m.13 views

The check for msg.value in distributeFees is unnecessary and may cause error

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Transactions may fail because of this redundant check. Proof of Concept The function distributeFees will revert if msg.value == 0: function distributeFeesuint256 tokenId public onlyOwner payable if msg.value == 0 revert NothingToDistribute; balancestoken...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder