The Frax ETH liquid staking protocol WRONGLY assumes that the users can convert their sfrxETH for more frxETH over time

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Frax ETH liquid staking protocol WRONGLY assumes that the users can convert their sfrxETH for more frxETH over time.But because of any untoward incident if the validators stake can gets slashed, then this assumption will be wrong and can cause severe...

TIMELOCK_ROLE Can Withdraw FUND from the Contracts via recoverEther()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Timelock Address role is misidentified in this agreement and has high authority. While I believe developer have good intention to use these functions. It often associate with Rug Pull by developer in the eyes of investors because Rug Pull is not...

Use of transfer() instead of call() to send eth

Lines of code Vulnerability details Use of transfer instead of call to send eth Impact Use of transfer might render ETH impossible to withdraw because after istanbul hardfork, there is increases in the gas cost of the SLOAD operation and therefore breaks some existing smart contracts.Those...

Risk of ETH funds Rug Pull in the moveWithheldETH and recoverEther functions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the frxETHMinter contract both the owner and governance timelock have the power to call the functions moveWithheldETH and recoverEther, those functions allow the transfer of the ETH from frxETHMinter to the owner or a given account, this means that th...

Admin rug vector in moveWithheldETH()

Lines of code Vulnerability details According to the documentation, currentWithheldETH is meant to: withhold part of the ETH deposit for future use, such as to earn yield in other places to supplement the ETH 2.0 staking yield The issue is that the owner can call moveWithheldETH with an arbitrary...

High privilege of setWithholdRatio function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact With the setWithholdRatio function, most of the funds can be authorized to be confiscated, such authority is too high and can confuse users, If this authority is to be used for commission deduction, it should be clearly stated. Proof of Concept /// @noti...

The user Can't swap their frxETH to ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact I’m so confused I didn't find any logic to withdrawing my funds ETH by transferring my frxETH Recommended Mitigation Steps Create logic for withdrawals swap --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

Some users won't be able to burn their crowdfund token to get their voting power

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User which is a contract who doesn't have a receive function can't burn his token to get the governance power, because ethOwed ether are transferred to him. This is correct even if ethOwed is 0. Tools Used Manual audit Recommended Mitigation Steps Consid...

splitRecipient resulting voting power tend to be overstated

Lines of code Vulnerability details When burn computes the contributor's share via getFinalContribution and contributor = splitRecipient it transfers the whole share to the splitRecipient in advance, even when not all the voting power were allocated. I.e. some contributors might not burn and the...

Attacker can DOS private party by donating ETH then calling buy

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Party is DOS'd and may potentially lose access to NFT Proof of Concept Crowdfund.solL280-L298 party = party = partyFactory .createParty addressthis, Party.PartyOptions name: name, symbol: symbol, governance: PartyGovernance.GovernanceOpts hosts:...

BuyCrowdfund.buy lacks access control

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Anyone can call BuyCrowdfund.buy and BuyCrowdfund.buy will call any function at any address and can send eth up to maximumPriceWhen maximumPrice is 0, all ETH in the contract can be sent. Consider maximumPrice = 70 ETH, the current seller's listing price...

Admin Privilege - Owner can Withdraw all ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details The function withdraw is meant to allow sweeping of ETH, the purpose is probably to simplify the process of getting back ETH that wasn't meant to be sent, or to take back ETH used for Gas Refunds. However the function itself can be viewed as a tool to steal...

Calling execute function for one proposal immediately after an ETH transfer to timelock contract, such as for another proposal, can steal the transferred ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The NounsDAOExecutor contract is the timelock for this protocol. It can receive ETH transfer through the following receive and fallback functions. receive external payable fallback external payable Alice can create a proposal that sends certain amount of...

Regular Expression Denial Of Service (ReDoS)

eth-account is vulnerable to regular expression denial of service. The vulnerability exists due to the insecure regex pattern used for the TYPEREGEX attribute in the validatetypesattribute function of validation.py, allowing an attacker to crash the application by providing a malicious input...

Regular expression denial of service in eth-account

An exponential ReDoS Regular Expression Denial of Service can be triggered in the eth-account PyPI package, when an attacker is able to supply arbitrary input to the encodestructureddata method...

CVE-2022-1930

An exponential ReDoS Regular Expression Denial of Service can be triggered in the eth-account PyPI package, when an attacker is able to supply arbitrary input to the encodestructureddata method...

CVE-2022-1930

An exponential ReDoS Regular Expression Denial of Service can be triggered in the eth-account PyPI package, when an attacker is able to supply arbitrary input to the encodestructureddata method...

CVE-2022-1930

CVE-2022-1930 – ReDoS in eth-account encode_structured_data Affected software: eth-account Python package. Vulnerable component: encode_structured_data function, with root cause linked to the insecure regex pattern used for TYPE_REGEX in validation.py, enabling exponential Regular Expression Deni...

CVE-2022-1930 ReDoS in eth-account encode_structured_data function

An exponential ReDoS Regular Expression Denial of Service can be triggered in the eth-account PyPI package, when an attacker is able to supply arbitrary input to the encodestructureddata method...

PT-2022-4437

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions eth-account affected versions not specified Description The issue is related to an exponential ReDoS Regular Expression Denial of Service that can be triggered in the eth-account PyPI package. This occurs when an attacker is able to supply...